FY 99 Project Implementation and
Data Development Plan

Original: December 21, 1998
Revised: February 3, 1999
Prepared for:
Bonneville Power Administration
Prepared by:
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
StreamNet Steering Committee:
Bonneville Power Administration
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
|
Contents |
|
Introduction |
| A. Data Holdings |
| B. FY 99 Quick Plan |
| C. StreamNet’s Relationship to Regional Policy and Scientific Guidance |
| D. Long-term Data Development Priorities |
| E. FY 99 Data Development Priorities for Each Participating Agency |
| F. Data Delivery Schedule |
| G. FY 99 Management Team |
| H. FY 99 Statement of Work Task Responsibilities |
| I. FY 99 Staff Time Allocation |
For more information on data development aspects of the FY 99 StreamNet Implementation and Data Development Plan please consult:
Introduction
This document identifies information that will assist in the implementation of the StreamNet project for fiscal year 1999. Special emphasis is placed on data development as this is both central to the project and complex to manage. This implementation plan was prepared in partial fulfillment of the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission's contract with the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). It has several purposes:
This document consists of several tables and documents that summarize information relevant to the StreamNet Statement of Work. A brief description of each section follows:
Data Holdings - This set of tables summarize information currently contained in the StreamNet data system. This summary was current as of July 1998. The data holdings document is revised approximately every six months. A new version will be available in early 1999.
Quick Plan - The quick plan presents a distillation of StreamNet's FY 99 Fish and Wildlife Program statement of work, as well as supplementary work statements for activities funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Marine Fisheries Service. All of the objectives and tasks are listed but much of the text has been removed to provide a concise overview.
StreamNet’s Relationship to Regional Policy and Scientific Guidance - This table correlates StreamNet objectives and tasks to policy documents related to the Fish and Wildlife Program, the Endangered Species Act, and related activities.
Long-term Data Development Priorities - This table presents a comprehensive list of data elements that are 1) currently in the StreamNet system, 2) being compiled currently, or 3) have been proposed for addition in the next three years. The purpose is to provide a context for implementing the current year statement of work and for planning future year activities. Anadromous fish data elements that are components of the StreamNet system were originally determined by means of a detailed resource managers’ data needs survey. This initial survey has been augmented through frequent contact with resource managers, planners, and decision makers, and through annual reviews of Fish and Wildlife Program-related documents and guidance. (See "StreamNet’s Relationship to Regional Policy and Scientific Guidance" table.) Proposed additions to StreamNet have been tracked through annual data plans dating to 1995. The StreamNet team is committed to revisiting data priorities at least annually to ensure that the StreamNet data plan is responsive to emerging critical needs.
Data Development Priorities for Each Participating Agency - This table identifies where participating agencies will focus their energies during the contract period. Priorities in the table are consistent with subcontracts to these agencies. The table reflects the differences between participating agencies in terms of resource base, data availability, and data needs. The table will prove useful to these agencies as they set and implement priorities.
Data Delivery Schedule - This table identifies the time that major data components will be completed. The table reflects the fact that the various agencies collect and compile data on different schedules and will be especially helpful in planning for incorporating data into the regional data system. It must be recognized that most of the data compiled by StreamNet derives from other sources. This schedule represents an educated estimate of when these data will be released by primary sources. A variety of circumstances - weather, budget, policy priorities, technical difficulties, legal proceedings, among others - may cause data delivery to be delayed or, in some cases, terminated. There also may be instances where circumstances within the project dictate a change in schedule, for example, when there is a change in key staff or when regional priorities dictate a reallocation of staff time. The schedule must, therefore, be viewed as a planning tool rather than a hard and fast contract obligation.
Management Team - This identifies members of the StreamNet team having responsibilities for coordinating the various project activities.
Task Responsibilities - This table identifies the individuals responsible for ensuring that the various objectives and tasks are implemented. At the regional level a person is identified who will track progress on each task. At the participating agency level this is not always the case. This reflects the fact that certain participants are more directly involved in some tasks than others.
Staff Time Allocations - This table translates the project budget into person months and allocates staff time according to the relative amount of effort that each individual will spend on a given task. The staff time allocation table has, in past years, proven to be an effective tool for tracking widespread activities. It also provides a means to communicate this to project funders and regional decision makers.
Data Holdings, Version 98-5
Major Updates From Version 98.4:
1. Addition of 1996-97 hatchery release data
2. Addition of historical salmon hatchery releases in Wa (back to the 1950’s)
3. Updated natural escapement data in Oregon
4. Addition of new attribute file for PNW 1:100,000 Reach File (available in Access download version).
5. Updated and streamlined Reference system
Table 1. Anadromous Fish Data Holdings for Version 98.5 of StreamNet Online. Table shows generalized types of available data. An online, detailed data dictionary can be seen by running our online data query and clicking the Data Holdings button. This will generate an up to the minute report of current data holdings.
|
Adult Data, Smolt Density Model |
||||||||
|
Geographic Area |
Species |
Mainstem Dam Counts |
Wier/Dam Counts |
Redd Counts |
Peak Spawn. Counts |
Est. of Spawn. Pop. |
Spawn - Recruit Est. |
Smolt Density Data |
|
Alaska |
Salmon |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
Salmon |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Idaho Col. Basin |
Salmon |
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
Montana (West Side) |
Various Resident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon Coastal |
Salmon |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Oregon Col. Basin |
Salmon |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
Washington Coastal |
Salmon |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Washington Col. Basin |
Salmon |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
Washington Puget Sound |
Salmon |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Hatchery Data |
Harvest Data |
||||||||
|
Geographic Area |
Species |
Releases |
Returns |
FW Sport |
FW Comm. |
FW Treaty |
Marine Sport |
Marine Comm. |
Marine Treaty |
|
Alaska |
Salmon |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
California |
Salmon |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia R |
Salmon |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho Col. Basin |
Salmon |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon Coastal |
Salmon |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Oregon Col. Basin |
Salmon |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Coastal |
Salmon |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Washington Col. Basin |
Salmon |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Puget Sound |
Salmon |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steelhead |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 1:100,000 Scale Fish Distribution Data Contents for Version 98.5 of StreamNet Online.
|
Geographic Area |
Anadromous Salmon & Steelhead |
Bull Trout |
Brown Trout |
Rainbow Trout |
Redband Trout |
West - Slope Cutthroat |
White Sturgeon |
|
Idaho |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montana (West Side Only) |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Oregon |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Non-Anadromous Data Contents for Version 98.5 of StreamNet Online.
|
Data Category |
Description / Status |
|
ONLINE DATA SYSTEMS |
|
|
Dams Facilities |
Complete for hydropower and dams 10ft and over in size for states of ID, MT, OR, and WA. |
|
Hatchery Facilities |
Complete for anadromous fish production facilities, partially complete for resident species for states of ID, MT, OR, and WA |
|
Photographs |
Over 600 digital photographs and images pertaining to aquatic resources in the Pacific Northwest. All are public domain and may be used as desired. |
|
Protected Areas Data |
Complete protected areas listings by stream from Northwest Power Planning Council Rulemaking in 1989. |
|
Protected Areas Detailed Data by reach with Final Value Classes |
Complete listings by reach of detailed data and final values classes from Protected Areas and the Pacific Northwest Rivers Study. |
|
Reference Library |
8,664 references as of 12/97, includes bibliographic citations from Northwest Power Planning Council. |
|
DATA AVAILABLE ON REQUEST |
|
|
Mean Monthly Tributary Flow Data (USGS) |
Complete through 1994 for most USGS gauging stations, data currently available from Regional Data Manager. |
|
Mainstem Dam Flow Data |
Daily Flow and spill data by project from 1960-1993, data currently available from Regional Data Manager. |
|
Nearshore Ocean Upwelling Indices |
Monthly Mean data for 11 west coast stations from 1946-1997, data currently available from Regional Data Manager. |
|
Sea Surface Temp and Pressure |
Complete temperature, pressure, and wind speed from 1854 - 1992, entire Pacific Ocean, data currently available from Regional Data Manager. |
StreamNet FY 99 Quick Plan
(BPA, NMFS, EPA contracts)

Objective 1 - Data Development. Increase the knowledge base concerning the region’s fish and wildlife resources through the acquisition of new information that responds to emerging needs as well as the updating and enhancement of production and survival trends and other existing information.
Task 1.1 Anadromous Fish.
Task 1.2 Resident Fish.
Task 1.3 Aquatic Habitat.
Task 1.4 Facilities.
Task 1.5 Environmental Improvement Projects.
Objective 2 - Data Management and Delivery. Provide high quality data management services, with specific emphasis on the creation of regionally consistent data sets and the timely delivery of data to users in formats that meets their policy, planning, and management needs.
Task 2.1 Database Management.
Task 2.2 Data Plan.
Task 2.3 Data Exchange Standards.
Task 2.4 GIS Data System.
Task 2.5 StreamNet Internet Site.
Task 2.6 1:100,000-scale Hydrography.
Task 2.7 Data Requests.
Objective 3 - Library / Reference Services. Provide professional library services targeted to meeting the needs of the region’s fish and wildlife decision-makers, planners, and managers. This includes continuing to acquire and catalog StreamNet data source materials and other critical documents and providing open and efficient access to these materials.
Task 3.1 Collection Development.
Task 3.2 Access to Collection.
Task 3.3 Catalog and Index Materials.
Task 3.4 Library Services.
Task 3.5 Inter-library Coordination.
Objective 4 - Services to Fish and Wildlife Program Activities. Provide substantive technical data services to Fish and Wildlife Program decision-makers and appropriate Fish and Wildlife Program projects.
Task 4.1 Project Tracking.
Task 4.2 Monitoring and Evaluation.
Task 4.3. Watershed Projects.
Task 4.4 Stock Assessment Projects.
Task 4.5 Service to Fish and Wildlife Program Projects and Activities
Task 4.6 Internet Access.
StreamNet will provide Internet access for information about, and data from, select FWP projects and activities.
Task 4.7 Protected Areas.
Objective 5 - Project Management. Provide effective leadership that ensures the production of high quality products targeted at critical applications and the development of these products in a timely, cost-effective manner.
Task 5.1 Manage Project Activities.
Task 5.2 Participate in Fish and Wildlife Program Development Activities.
Task 5.3 Prepare Public Information Materials.
Task 5.4 Coordinate With Related Activities.
Objective 6 - EPA Environmental Data Development. Expand, management, and maintain the StreamNet database to meet several high priority data needs identified by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Note: The geographic scope for data development under objective 1, tasks 1.1 through 1.8 includes the states of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Task 6.1 Salmonid Species Data.
Task 6.2 Field Stream Survey Data.
Agency data linked to PNW hydrographic files, ODFW field surveys as first priority.
Task 6.3 Stream Temperature Summary Data.
Task 6.4 Macroinvertibrate Sampling Data.
Xerces Society macroinvertebrate sampling data linked to PNW hydrography.
Task 6.5 Water Quality Data.
Task 6.6 Remote Access to Spatial Data.
Provide means for creation of aquatic resource data on PC without GIS software.
Task 6.7 Data Compilation Processes
Establish mechanisms for data collection and quality assessment within States to streamline and increase efficiency of collection and error checking of aquatic data.
Task 6.8 IRICC Web Page
Enhance and maintain WWW page for the Interagency Resource Information Coordinating Council.
Objective 7 - NMFS Anadromous Fish Trend Data Development. Expand the StreamNet database to all anadromous salmonid populations in the states of California, Oregon, and Washington.
Task 7.1 Abundance Data.
Update natural adult abundance data, focusing on anadromous populations outside of the Columbia River Basin.
Task 7.2 Hatchery Data.
Update hatchery release and return data, focusing on anadromous populations outside of the Columbia River Basin.
Task 7.3 Harvest Data.
Update freshwater and marine harvest data, focusing on anadromous populations outside of the Columbia River Basin.
Objective 8 - NMFS Habitat Restoration Projects. Expand the StreamNet database to include habitat restoration projects in the states of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Task 8.1 Standardized Format.
Specify, in a standardized format, the types of information on habitat restoration projects to be included in StreamNet.
Task 8.2 Enhancement Project Data Development.
Gather and incorporate information on habitat restoration projects since 1980 for the benefit of salmon or steelhead stocks.
Task 8.3 Technical Guidance and Assistance.
Provide guidance/advice to NMFS regarding the structure and format of the RFA database.
Task 8.4 Coordination with NMFS.
Consult regarding problems that may arise in connection with data collection, formatting, etc.
Task 8.5 Meeting Coordination.
Assist in coordinating two meetings of experts to develop and estimate models for predicting restoration costs. Meetings will identify appropriate models and evaluate results of model estimation.
StreamNet’s Relationship to Regional Policy and Scientific Guidance
This table correlates proposed StreamNet tasks to action items in major guidance documents. References are to sections or pages. Included are both specific references to StreamNet and references to the types of data and data services provided by StreamNet. Other regional documents were also reviewed as part of this evaluation, including the Oregon Plan, the Idaho Bull Trout Plan, the Washington Wild Fish Policy, and the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project (Assessment of Ecosystem Components).
|
|
1994 FWP |
Tribal Plan |
Snake R. Recovery Plan |
Return to the River |
MYIP |
ISRP Reviews of 98 and 99 AIWP |
CBFWA & NPPC 98 and 99 AIWP Recommendations |
|
Overall Need for StreamNet Data |
3.3A,B,D |
5A-4 |
0.3,0.3.a |
p. 430, 449 |
5.5.1.1, 5.11.3.1 |
V-C.1.1, V-C.1.2 (99) |
CBFWA 2.5.1.4, 2.7.1 (98) NWPPC 18b (99) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY99 Tasks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Data Development |
3.3C.1, 3.3A.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Anadromous fish |
3.3B.1, 5OF.IS, 7.1C.4 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
p. 432 |
|
V-C.1.1 (99) |
CBFWA 2.2.3, 2.7.1 (98) |
|
a) Range, life history |
2.2D, 3.3B.1 |
5D-1 |
0.3.a |
p. 429, 449 |
|
|
CBFWA 2.4.3 (98) |
|
b) Adult abundance |
3.3B.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
p. 429 |
5.5.2.1 |
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
c) Juvenile abundance |
3.3B.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
p. 429 |
|
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
d) Harvest |
3.3B.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
|
5.5.2.1 |
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
e) Nat. production |
3.3b.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
p. 429 |
|
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
f) Hatchery production |
3.3B.1, Artifical Product-ion Review |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
|
|
|
|
|
g) Age/sex comp. |
3.3B.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
|
5.5.2.1 |
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
h) Genetics, populations |
1b3. Juvenile abundance |
|
4.2.d |
p. 444&5, 511, 518 |
5.5.2.1 |
|
|
|
i) Population |
4.3C.1, 7.1C2&3 |
5D-3 |
|
p. 426 |
5.5.2.1 |
|
CBFWA 2.7, 27.2 (98) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 Resident fish |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
6.4.1, 6.4.2 to 7 |
III.B.13 (98) III-B (99) |
CBFWA 2.2.3, 2.7.1 (98) |
|
a) Range, life history |
|
N/A |
N/A |
p. 449 |
6.4.2 to 7 |
III.B.13 (98) |
CBFWA 2.4.3 (98) |
|
b) Adult abundance |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
6.4.1 |
III.B.13 (98) |
|
|
c) Angler use |
8.5E.1 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
III.B.13, III.B.15 (98) |
|
|
d) Hatchery production |
Artifical Product-ion Review |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
III.B.13 (98) |
|
|
e) Genetics |
2.2A, 7.1C.1&2 |
N/A |
N/A |
p. 444&5, 511, 518 |
6.4.2 to 7 |
III.B.14 (98) |
|
|
f) Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBFWA 2.7, 2.7.2 (98) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3. Aquatic habitat |
3.3D.1 |
|
1.1.a |
|
5.9.4-1 |
|
CBFWA 2.4.3, 2.7.1 (98) |
|
a) ICBEMP habitat |
|
|
|
p. 431 |
|
|
|
|
b) other ICBEMP |
7.6D |
|
1.1.a |
p. 353 |
5.9.4-1 |
|
|
|
c) Water quality |
|
|
|
p. 443 |
|
|
|
|
d) Stream survey |
7.6D |
5B-5-9 |
1.1.a, 1.1b.3 |
p. 443 |
5.9.4-1 |
|
CBFWA 2.7.2 (98) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Dam |
12.2 |
|
1.6.a |
|
|
|
|
|
b) Hatcheries |
8.1, Artifical Product-ion Review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Diversions |
|
|
1.2.a, 1.5.b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
III.A.1 (98) |
|
|
a) FWP projects |
3.3E.1 |
|
|
|
|
III.A.1 (98) |
|
|
b) MOA projects |
3.3E.1 |
|
|
p. 449 |
7.4.2 |
III.B.20 (98) |
V-C.5.3 (99) |
|
c) Other projects |
3.3E.1 |
|
|
p. 449 |
7.4.2 |
III.B.20 (98) |
V-C.5.3 (99) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Data Management |
3.3A.1 |
5D-2 |
0.3.a |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Database |
3.3.A.1, 3.3C.1 |
|
0.3.a |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Data plan |
3.3A.1 |
|
0.3.a |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 Exchange standards |
3.3A.1 |
|
0.3.a |
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 GIS |
3.3D.1 |
|
1.1.a |
|
7.4.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 Internet |
|
|
0.3.a |
|
|
V-C.1.3 (99) |
|
|
2.6 Hydrology |
3.3E.1 |
|
|
|
5.5.2 |
|
CBFWA 2.2.3 (98) |
|
2.7 Data requests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Library Services |
3.3C.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Collection development |
3.3C.1 |
5A-4 |
|
p. 430 |
|
|
NWPPC 18b (99) |
|
3.2 Access to collection |
3.3C.1 |
5A-4 |
|
p. 430 |
|
|
|
|
3.3 Cataloging |
3.3C.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 Library services |
3.3C.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 Coordination |
3.3C.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Services to FWP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Project tracking |
3.3E.1 |
|
|
|
8.3.2 |
V-C.5.3 (99) |
NWPPC 9.a (98) NWPPC 18b (99) |
|
4.2 M&E |
3.2A.1&2; 4.3C.1; 3.3A.2 |
5D-2 |
2.1.d.5 |
p. 425, 426 |
5.5.2.1 |
|
CBFWA 2.2.3 (98) NWPPC 18b (99) |
|
4.3 Watershed projects |
3.1D.2, 7.0C.2 |
vol. II |
1.4.a |
p. 444 |
|
III.B.7 (98) V-C.3.1 (99) |
NWPPC 2, p. 10-11 (98) NWPPC 5a,b (99) |
|
4.4 Stock assessment projects |
10.8.B&C |
|
|
|
|
III.B.13 (98) |
NWPPC 2, p. 12 (98) |
|
4.5 Projects and activities |
3.2F.1 3.2G.2 3.2B.1, 3.3A.2 |
|
0.3.b 0.3.d |
|
8.3.3 |
|
NWPPC 4.b (98) |
|
4.6 Internet access |
7.0C.2 |
|
|
|
8.3.1 |
|
NWPPC 9.b (98) |
|
4j. Protected Areas |
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Project Management |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
StreamNet Long-term Data Development Priorities
|
Current SOW |
Future Possibilities |
Priority for Future |
|
|
1.1 - Anadro. Fish |
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
b) adult abundance |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
c) juvenile data |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
d) harvest |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
e) natural production |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
f) hatchery production |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
g) age/sex composition |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
h) genetics |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
i) populations |
X |
Infrequent update |
Ongoing, Moderate |
|
j) historic range (qualitative) |
X |
One time |
No need |
|
k) historic range (quantitative) |
|
X |
High/Moderate |
|
l) potential range |
|
X |
Low (same as historic?) |
|
m) genetic characteristics |
|
X |
Low (only if asked) |
|
n) predation |
|
X |
Low |
|
o) disease sample sites (wild fish) |
|
X |
Moderate/High |
|
p) juvenile overwintering survival |
|
X |
Discuss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 - Resident Fish |
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
b) adult abundance |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
c) angler use |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
d) hatchery production |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
e) genetics |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
f) populations |
X |
Infrequent update |
Ongoing, Moderate |
|
g) historic range (qualitative) |
X |
One time |
No need |
|
h) historic range (quantitative) |
|
X |
Low (difficult) |
|
i) health/status |
|
X |
High for sensitive species and for policy use, Low for management |
|
j) native, non-salmonid distribution |
|
X |
High |
|
k) introduced, non-salmonid distribution |
|
X |
High for problem species, otherwise low |
|
l) genetic characteristics |
|
X |
Low (only if asked) |
|
m) management classifications |
|
X |
Moderate/High |
|
m) species competition |
|
X |
Moderate, see "k" |
|
n) disease sample sites (wild fish) |
|
X |
Moderate/High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 - Habitat |
|
|
|
|
a) ICBEMP habitat |
X |
One time |
No need |
|
b) other ICBEMP |
X |
One time |
No need |
|
c) water quality |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
d) stream surveys |
X |
Expand |
Ongoing, High |
|
e) aquatic habitat quality |
|
X |
High for policy use, Lower for management |
|
f) sensitive aquatic animal distribution |
|
X |
High |
|
g) ESA critical habitats |
|
X |
High |
|
h) flow |
|
X |
Moderate |
|
i) barrier information |
|
X |
Moderate/High |
|
j) lake hydrologic referencing |
|
X |
Moderate |
|
k) lake hydrological character |
|
X |
Low |
|
l) trib. reservoir hydrological character |
|
X |
Low |
|
m) wetlands referencing |
|
X |
Low |
|
n) wetlands characteristics |
|
X |
Low |
|
o) upland habitat characteristics |
|
X |
Low |
|
p) upland habitat quality |
|
X |
Low |
|
q) estuary habitat characteristics |
|
X |
High |
|
r) estuary habitat quality |
|
X |
Moderate |
|
s) ocean habitat characteristics |
|
X |
High |
|
t) ocean habitat quality |
|
X |
Moderate |
|
u) core anadromous habitats |
|
X |
High |
|
v) core resident habitats |
|
X |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
a) dams |
X |
Expand |
Moderate |
|
b) hatcheries |
X |
Periodic update |
High |
|
c) diversions |
EX |
X |
Moderate (difficult) |
|
d) fish passage facility status/characteristics |
|
X |
Moderate/High |
|
e) diversion screening status |
|
X |
High |
|
f) water diversion/allocation |
|
X |
Low (essential but not our responsibility) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
a) FW Program |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
b) interagency MOA |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
c) other projects |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 - Wildlife |
|
|
|
|
a) sensitive aquatic animals |
|
X |
High |
|
b) sensitive riparian animals |
|
X |
Moderate |
|
c) upland T&E animals |
|
X |
Low/Moderate |
|
d) waterfowl distribution |
|
X |
Low/Moderate |
|
e) big game distribution |
|
X |
Low/Moderate |
|
f) big game winter range |
|
X |
Low/Moderate |
|
g) mitigation parcel characteristics & maps |
|
X |
(If requested by FWP) |
|
h) aquatic & riparian T&E plants |
|
X |
Low/Moderate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 - Mainstem |
|
|
To be determined |
|
a) riparian habitat character |
|
X |
|
|
b) spill flow |
|
X |
|
|
c) turbine flow |
|
X |
|
|
d) screening, FGE |
|
X |
|
|
e) juvenile trans |
|
X |
|
|
f) dissolved gases |
|
X |
|
|
g) reservoir characteristics |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 - EPA |
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
b) stream surveys |
X |
Expand |
Ongoing, High |
|
c) temperature |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, Moderate |
|
d) macroinvertebrate |
X |
Periodic update |
Easy once established |
|
e) water quality |
X |
Periodic update |
Ongoing, High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 - NMFS data |
|
|
|
|
a) abundance |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
b) hatchery |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
c) harvest |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 - NMFS projects |
|
|
|
|
a) projects |
X |
Annual update |
Ongoing, High |
FY 99 Data Development Priorities for Each Participating Agency
priority
: 1 = critical, must complete this year; 2 = high priority, depends on data availability; 3 = long-term objectiveaction: annual update = add current year trends, acquire = existing data available from others, new data type = initial effort, start with data exchange standards, refine = existing non-trend data needing updating
participant effort: (refers to effort in actually compiling data, not in porting to the regional system) 1 = data available, complete this year; 2 = data uncertain, will work on; 3 = low level of effort anticipated; 4 = completed; 5 = not applicable
|
Priority |
Action |
PSMFC |
CRITFC |
IDFG |
MFWP |
ODFW |
SBT |
USFWS |
WDFW |
|
|
1.1 - Anadromous Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
Refine |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
b) adult abundance |
1 |
Annual update |
5 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
c) juvenile data |
2 |
New data type |
5 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
|
d) harvest |
1 |
Annual update |
5 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
e) natural production |
2 |
New data type |
5 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
f) hatchery production |
1 |
Annual update |
5 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
g) age/sex composition |
2 |
New data type |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
h) genetics |
2 |
New data type |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
|
i) populations |
2 |
Acquire |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
j)historic range |
2 |
Acquire |
1 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1.2 - Resident Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
Refine |
1 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
b) adult abundance |
2 |
New data type |
5 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
c) angler use |
2 |
New data type |
5 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
d) hatchery production |
1 |
New data type |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
|
e) genetics |
2 |
New data type |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
f) populations |
3 |
Acquire |
5 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
g) historic range |
2 |
Acquire |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1.3 - Habitat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) ICBEMP habitat |
1 |
Acquire |
2 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
b) other ICBEMP |
2 |
Acquire |
1 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
c) water quality |
2 |
Acquire |
1 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
d) stream surveys |
2 |
Acquire |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
1.4 - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) dams |
2 |
Refine |
4 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
b) hatcheries |
1 |
Refine |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
c) diversions |
3 |
Acquire |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
1.5 - Enhancement Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) FW Program |
|
Refine |
2 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
b) interagency MOA |
3 |
New data type |
2 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
c) other projects |
3 |
New data type |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 - EPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
1 |
Refine |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
b) stream surveys |
1 |
Acquire |
2 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
c) temperature |
1 |
Acquire |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
d) macroinvertebrate |
1 |
Acquire |
2 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
e) water quality |
1 |
Acquire |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 - NMFS data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) abundance |
1 |
Annual update |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
b) hatchery |
1 |
Annual update |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
c) harvest |
1 |
Annual update |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 - NMFS projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) projects |
2 |
New data type |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
FY 99 Data Delivery Schedule
1 = exchange format
2 = partial data (e.g., select species or geographic areas)
3 = complete data
|
|
Oct 31 |
Nov 30 |
Dec 31 |
Jan 31 |
Feb 28 |
Mar 31 |
Apr 30 |
May 31 |
Jun 30 |
July 31 |
Aug 31 |
Sep 30 |
|
1.1 - Anadromous Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) hatchery production |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
j)historic range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
c) juvenile data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
d) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
e) natural production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
g) age/sex composition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
h) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
i) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
c) juvenile data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
d) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
e) natural production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
g) age/sex composition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
h) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
i) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
c) juvenile data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
d) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
e) natural production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
g) age/sex composition |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
h) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
i) populations |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 - Resident Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g) historic range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
c) angler use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
d) hatchery production |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
e) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
c) angler use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
d) hatchery production |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
e) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
c) angler use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
d) hatchery production |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
e) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
b) adult abundance |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) angler use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
d) hatchery production |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
e) genetics |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) populations |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 - Habitat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) ICBEMP habitat |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) other ICBEMP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
c) water quality |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) stream surveys |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) dams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
c) diversions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) hatcheries |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) hatcheries |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) hatcheries |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) hatcheries |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 - Enhancement Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) FW Program |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) interagency MOA |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
c) other projects |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 - EPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) stream surveys |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
c) temperature |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
d) macroinvertebrate |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e) water quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) temperature |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
e) water quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) stream surveys |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
c) temperature |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
e) water quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) salmon species |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
c) temperature |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
e) water quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 - NMFS data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
b) hatchery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
c) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
b) hatchery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
c) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) abundance |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
b) hatchery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
c) harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 - NMFS projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) projects |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) projects |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) projects |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
StreamNet FY 99 Management Team
Steering Committee
Bart Butterfield, IDFG
Cedric Cooney, ODFW
Janet Decker-Hess, MFWP
Dick O'Connor, WDFW
Stephen Pastor, USFWS
Drew Parkin, PSMFC
Phil Roger, CRITFC
Alan Ruger, BPA
Doug Taki, SBT
Regional Project Coordinators
Michael Banach, regional data development coordinator
Douglas Burch, regional data manager
Matthew Freid, regional GIS manager
Karen McGill, web site coordinator
Drew Parkin, project manager
Vacant, StreamNet librarian
Participating Agency Data Management Coordinators
Cedric Cooney, ODFW
Hilary Forrest, CRITFC
Jeff Hutton, MFWP
Leslie Sikora, Bob Woodard, WDFW
Bob McAllister, CDFG
Bruce Murdock, IDFG
Participating Agency GIS Coordinators
Bart Butterfield, IDFG
Jon Bowers, ODFW
Martin Hudson, WDFW
Jeff Hutton, MFWP
Contracting Officer Technical Representatives
Alan Ruger, BPA
Bill Bogue, EPA
Steve Freeze, NMFS
StreamNet FY 99 Statement of Work: Task Responsibilities
NA = not applicable
Blank = secondary role or not defined
|
Objective |
Task/Subtask |
Overall |
CRITFC |
IDFG |
MFWP |
ODFW |
SBT |
USFWS |
WDFW |
|
1. Data Develop |
|
||||||||
|
|
1.1 Anadromous Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
Freid |
|
Butterfield |
NA |
Bowers |
|
|
Burns |
|
|
b) adult abundance |
Banach |
Forrest |
Elms |
NA |
Cooney |
|
|
Sikora |
|
|
c) juvenile data |
Banach |
Forrest |
Brown |
NA |
Cooney |
|
|
Sikora |
|
|
d) harvest |
Banach |
Forrest |
Elms |
NA |
Cooney |
|
|
Nielsen |
|
|
e) natural production |
Banach |
Forrest |
Brown |
NA |
Cooney |
|
|
Woodard |
|
|
f) hatchery production |
Banach |
Forrest |
Elms |
NA |
Cooney |
|
Pastor |
Woodard |
|
|
g) age/sex composition |
Banach |
Forrest |
Elms |
NA |
Cooney |
|
|
Woodard |
|
|
h) genetics |
Banach |
|
|
NA |
|
Taki |
|
|
|
|
i) populations |
Banach |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
O'Connor |
|
|
j) historic range |
Freid |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 Resident Fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) range, life history |
Banach |
|
Butterfield |
Hutten |
Bowers |
|
|
Burns |
|
|
b) adult abundance |
Banach |
|
|
Decker-H |
|
|
|
Sikora |
|
|
c) angler use |
Banach |
|
|
Decker-H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) hatchery productions |
Banach |
|
Elms |
Decker-H |
|
|
|
Sikora |
|
|
e) genetics |
Banach |
|
|
Decker-H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) populations |
Banach |
|
|
Decker-H |
|
|
|
O'Connor |
|
|
g) historic range |
Freid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h) status |
Banach |
|
|
Decker-H |
|
|
|
O'Connor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 Aquatic Habitat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) ICBEMP habitat |
Freid |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
b) other ICBEMP |
Freid |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
c) water quality |
Freid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) stream survey |
Freid |
Forrest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) dams |
Parkin |
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
O'C/Huds |
|
|
b) hatcheries |
Banach |
|
Elms |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
NA |
Pastor |
Kinney |
|
|
c) diversions |
Parkin |
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
1.5 Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) FWP |
Parkin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) MOA |
Parkin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) other |
Pakin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Data Manage |
|
||||||||
|
|
2.1 Database |
Burch |
Forrest |
Murdock |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
|
|
Brown |
|
|
2.2 Data Plan |
Parkin |
Roger |
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
Taki |
Pastor |
O'Connor |
|
|
2.3 Exchange Standards |
Burch |
Roger |
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
Taki |
Pastor |
O'Connor |
|
|
2.4 GIS |
Freid |
|
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Bowers |
|
|
Hudson |
|
|
2.5 Internet |
McGill |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
2.6 Hydrography |
Freid |
|
Butterfield |
Hutten |
Bowers |
|
|
Hudson |
|
|
2.7 Data Requests |
Burch |
Forrest |
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
Taki |
Pastor |
Sikora |
|
3. Library Services |
|
||||||||
|
|
3.1 Collection |
TBA |
TBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 Access |
TBA |
TBA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
3.3 Catalog/index |
TBA |
TBA |
Elms |
Curd Rau |
Bourne |
NA |
NA |
Sikora |
|
|
3.4 Services |
TBA |
TBA |
|
Curd Rau |
Bourne |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 Inter-library |
TBA |
TBA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
4. FWP Services |
|
||||||||
|
|
4.1 Project Tracking |
Parkin |
Forrest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 Monitoring |
Parkin |
Roger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 Watersheds |
Freid |
Forrest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 Stock Assessments |
Banach |
|
Butterfield |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
O'Connor |
|
|
4.5 Misc. |
Parkin |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
4.6 Internet Access |
McGill |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
4.7 Protected Areas |
Parkin |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
5. Project Manage |
|
||||||||
|
|
5.1 Project Management |
Parkin |
Roger |
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
Taki |
Pastor |
O'Connor |
|
|
5.2 FWP Coordination |
Parkin |
Roger |
|
|
|
Taki |
|
|
|
|
5.3 Public Information |
McGill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 Misc. Coordination |
Parkin |
|
Butterfield |
Decker-H |
Cooney |
Taki |
Pastor |
O'Connor |
|
6. EPA Data |
|
||||||||
|
|
6.1 Salmonid Species |
Freid |
NA |
Butterfield |
NA |
Bowers |
NA |
NA |
Burns |
|
|
6.2 Stream Surveys |
Freid |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Jones |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
6.3 Temperature |
Banach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 Macroinvertebrate |
Banach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 Water Quality |
Freid |
|
Butterfield |
|
Bowers |
|
|
Hudson |
|
|
6.6 Spatial Data |
Freid |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
6.7 Data Compilation |
Burch |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
6.8 IRICC Web Page |
McGill |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7. NMFS Data |
|
||||||||
|
|
7.1 Abundance |
Banach |
NA |
Elms |
NA |
Cooney |
NA |
NA |
Sikora |
|
|
7.2 Hatchery |
Banach |
|
Elms |
|
Cooney |
|
|
Sikora |
|
|
7.3 Harvest |
Banach |
|
Elms |
|
Cooney |
|
|
Sikora |
|
8. NMFS Projects |
|
||||||||
|
|
8.1 Standard Format |
Banach |
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
8.2 Data Development |
Banach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 Tech. Assistance |
Parkin |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
8.4 Coordination |
Allen |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
8.5 Meeting coord. |
Allen |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
StreamNet FY 99 Staff Time Allocation
(in months, rounded to .1)
BPA Contract = Objectives 1 through 5; EPA Contract = Objective 6; NMFS Contracts = Objectives 6 & 7
|
Personnel |
Objective # |
||||||||||||
|
|
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
total |
|
CRITFC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Phil Roger, project coordinator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Hilary Forrest, data manager |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
TBA, librarian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Lenora Oftedahl, asst librarian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
David Liberty, library tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Jonas Green, library tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
totals |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
35 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tribal Subcontracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nez Perce |
2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Umatilla |
2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Warm Springs |
2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Yakama |
2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
totals |
8 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
IDFG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brown, Evan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
|
Butterfield, Bart |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
2 |
|
0.5 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
Butterfield, Vanessa |
0.5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Elms-Cockrum, Terry |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Hartpence, Lawrence |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Mauser, Greg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Murdock, Bruce |
1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Scarlet, Desiree |
|
|
2 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Stephens, George |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
TBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
|
totals |
3.6 |
9.2 |
5.1 |
3.1 |
|
19 |
2 |
.5 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
2.5 |
57 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
MFWP |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Janet Decker Hess |
|
2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
|
0.5 |
1.7 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Jeff Hutten |
|
2.5 |
0.5 |
|
1 |
3.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Lydia Bailey |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
4 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Angie Schmidt |
|
5.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Jennfier Corbin |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Kathleen Curd Rau |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Sharon Sarver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
totals |
|
12.2 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
2.0 |
12.9 |
3.1 |
1.0 |
2.9 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
ODFW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent Forsberg, biologist |
2 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
1.75 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
Milt Hill, GIS specialist |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Kevleen Melcher, data comp. |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Briana Sounhein, data compiler |
2 |
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
1 |
|
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
|
6 |
|
Eric Tinus, CRM data compiler |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Vacant NRS-1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
Vacant NRS-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
|
Totals |
17.4 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
17.1 |
0 |
0 |
5.8 |
4.5 |
5 |
4 |
62.8 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
ODFW Subcontract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burke, data compiler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Flitcroft, data compiler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
Kavanaugh, data compiler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
Reis, data compiler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
PSMFC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Banach, fish biologist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
3.5 |
6 |
12 |
|
Douglas Burch, data manager |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
5 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
|
Matt Freid, GIS manager |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
12 |
|
Karen McGill, Web specialist |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
1.5 |
8.5 |
|
Drew Parkin, project manager |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
12 |
|
Contract programmer(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
17 |
|
TBA, data tech 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
9 |
|
TBA, data tech 2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
totals |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
14.5 |
14.5 |
13.5 |
88.5 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
SBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Doug Taki, coordinator |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
totals |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
USFWS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Stephen pastor, coordinator |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
totals |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
WDFW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clerical support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Larry Brown, compiler/prgmr |
5 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Cindy Burns, GIS compiler |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Mark Henry, data compiler |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
2 |
12 |
|
Martin Hudson, GIS prgmr |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
10 |
|
Bill Kinney, supervisor/prgmr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Sarah Nielsen, data compiler |
4 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
12 |
|
Dick O’Connor, project lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Leslie Sikora, data manager |
3.4 |
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
9.6 |
|
Bob Woodard, data compiler |
5.2 |
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
9 |
|
totals |
19.6 |
5 |
|
3.5 |
21 |
|
|
3.6 |
5 |
10 |
5.5 |
73.2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPA Contract |
55.6 |
33.9 |
16.8 |
14.8 |
6.5 |
91 |
41.2 |
14.5 |
23.3 |
|
|
|
297.6 |
|
EPA Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
NMFS Data Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
31.5 |
|
NMFS Project Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5 |
25.5 |
|
totals |
55.6 |
33.9 |
16.8 |
14.8 |
6.5 |
91 |
41.2 |
14.5 |
23.3 |
41 |
31.5 |
25.5 |
395.6 |