15	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	15	1	31
16	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	16	1	5
46	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	46	1	101
47	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	47	1	162
48	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	88	9	31
49	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	89	9	32
50	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	90	9	61
51	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	91	9	62
52	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	92	9	101
53	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	93	9	102
54	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	94	9	141
55	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	95	9	142
56	Squaw Creek Culvert				SQW 1a Culvert at Hwy153 all Culvert Upstream NA3 WDOT/WDFW		3	29	96	9	162
57	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	97	9	31
58	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	98	9	32
59	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	99	9	61
60	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	100	9	62
61	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	101	9	101
62	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	102	9	102
63	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	103	9	141
64	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	104	9	142
65	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	105	9	162
66	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	106	1	31
67	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	107	1	5
68	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	108	1	61
69	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	109	1	101
70	South Fork Gold Ck. Rd 330 culvert				Gold SF 1a Culvert at USFS 330 above Rainey Ck all Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 LFA, USFS		3	41	110	1	162
71	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	111	1	31
72	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	112	1	5
73	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	113	1	61
74	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	114	1	101
75	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	115	1	162
76	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	116	9	31
77	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	117	9	32
78	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	118	9	61
79	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	119	9	62
80	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	120	9	101
81	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	121	9	102
82	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	122	9	141
83	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	123	9	142
84	Umberger/McCall diversion				Gold 2a Umberger/McCall diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.85 NA 5 LFA;HWG has no details;mixed reports on whether it is active; Golder 2002 lists it at 1 cfs out of 6.5 total.  Assume passage is directly related to flow.		5	51	124	9	162
85	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	125	1	31
86	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	126	1	5
87	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	127	1	61
88	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	128	1	101
89	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	129	1	162
90	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	130	9	31
91	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	131	9	32
92	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	132	9	61
93	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	133	9	62
94	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	134	9	101
95	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	135	9	102
96	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	136	9	141
97	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	137	9	142
98	Crevlin diversion				Gold 3a  Flow Diversion	Gold 3a Crevlin diversion all Flow Diversion Downstream May-Oct 0.50 NA 5 HWG 2003;does not cover the whole channel so no upstream effect. HWG (C. Iten) estimated from personal observation was that it diverted ~1/2 the flow in July 2003, 1/2 of that was returned but survival in the return channel was questionable. John Stormin (WDOE says it is diverting 100% in August).   Golder 2002 says it diverts 1.5 cfs out of a total of 6.5. Too many uncertainties so use 50% hypothetical passage.	5	57	138	9	162
99	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	139	9	31
100	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	140	9	32
101	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	141	9	61
102	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	142	9	62
103	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	143	9	101
104	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	144	9	102
105	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	145	9	141
106	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	146	9	142
107	Libby 1a (Art Breed)				Boulder push up (Art Breed)	Libby 1a Boulder push up (Art Breed) all Flow Diversion Downstream Upstream July-Oct 50 1 5 diversion is thought to block the channel at low flow, passage is not known but could be zero in some flows/years  HWG 2003	5	71	147	9	162
108	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	148	1	31
109	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	149	1	5
110	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	150	1	61
111	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	151	1	101
112	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	152	1	162
113	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	153	9	31
114	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	154	9	32
115	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	155	9	61
116	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	156	9	62
117	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	157	9	101
118	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	158	9	102
119	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	159	9	141
120	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	160	9	142
121	Libby 2a Larson Ditch				Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	Libby 2a Larson Ditch all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0.33 NA 5 No downstream because it is screened (LFA) 2 of 3 cfs are diverted (Mullen et al 1992) so use 33 % passage	5	77	161	9	162
122	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	162	1	31
123	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	163	1	5
124	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	164	1	61
125	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	165	1	101
126	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	166	1	162
127	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	167	9	31
128	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	168	9	32
129	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	169	9	61
130	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	170	9	62
131	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	171	9	101
132	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	172	9	102
133	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	173	9	141
134	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	174	9	142
135	Libby 3a Culvert				Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream 33 NA 3 SSHIAP	Libby 3a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	83	175	9	162
136	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	176	1	31
137	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	177	1	5
138	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	178	1	61
139	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	179	1	101
140	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	180	1	162
141	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	181	9	31
142	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	182	9	32
143	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	183	9	61
144	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	184	9	62
145	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	185	9	101
146	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	186	9	102
147	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	187	9	141
148	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	188	9	142
149	Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert)				10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert); Use 5% passage because only certain fish can make it over in certain years.	10 Smith 1a Smith Canyon Creek (culvert) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003) Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP, Very small pipe-should be less than 33% (HWG July2003)	3	91	189	9	162
155	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	195	9	31
156	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	196	9	32
157	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	197	9	61
158	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	198	9	62
159	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	199	9	101
160	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	200	9	102
161	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	201	9	141
162	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	202	9	142
163	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	203	9	162
164	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	204	1	31
165	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	205	1	5
166	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	206	1	61
167	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	207	1	101
168	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam				Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam	Beav 1a Fort Thurlow Diversion Dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0 NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream  3% NA 3 65 of 67 redds were below the diversion, WDFW Methow Eval. 2002 (Charlie Snow) (passage should be reduced accordingly)	5	105	208	1	162
169	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	209	1	31
170	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	210	1	5
171	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	211	1	61
172	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	212	1	101
173	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	213	1	162
174	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	214	9	31
175	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	215	9	32
176	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	216	9	61
177	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	217	9	62
178	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	218	9	101
179	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	219	9	102
180	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	220	9	141
181	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	221	9	142
182	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert				Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream 66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	Beav 2a State Hwy. 20 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003 Adult Culvert Upstream  66 NA 3 WDOT/WDFW 2003	3	111	222	9	162
183	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	223	1	31
184	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	224	1	5
185	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	225	1	61
186	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	226	1	101
187	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	227	1	162
188	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	228	9	31
189	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	229	9	32
190	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	230	9	61
191	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	231	9	62
192	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	232	9	101
193	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	233	9	102
194	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	234	9	141
195	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	235	9	142
196	Fraz1a Obstruction complex				Starting with a culvert at RM 0.1 there is at least 17 various obstructions (Gower and Espie 2001)	13 Fraz1a Obstruction complex all Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	119	236	9	162
197	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	237	1	31
198	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	238	1	5
199	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	239	1	61
200	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	240	1	101
201	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	241	1	162
202	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	242	9	31
203	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	243	9	32
204	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	244	9	61
205	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	245	9	62
206	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	246	9	101
207	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	247	9	102
208	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	248	9	141
209	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	249	9	142
210	Beav 4a Obstruction complex				Complex of 1 culvert and 2 obstructions that are known to impede migration.	14 Beav 4a Obstruction complex Age-0 fingerling Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 Private push up dam (Beatty); Nelson Marracchi diversion dam; & culvert  Age-1 Juvenile Complex Upstream  0 NA 3 the culvert is 33% passage and the dams are partial blockage in some years  Adult Complex Upstream  33 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	3	127	250	9	162
230	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	270	1	31
231	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	271	1	5
232	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	272	1	61
233	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	273	1	101
234	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	274	1	162
235	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	275	9	31
236	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	276	9	32
237	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	277	9	61
238	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	278	9	62
239	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	279	9	101
240	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	280	9	102
241	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	281	9	141
242	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	282	9	142
243	LBridge1a   Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)				LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd)	16 LBridge1a Culvert (County Rd. Twisp R. Rd) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 PWI 2003  Adult Culvert Upstream all 5 NA 4 PWI 2003; some adult stsu get over in certain years, HWG July2003	3	163	283	9	162
244	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	284	9	31
245	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	285	9	32
246	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	286	9	61
247	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	287	9	62
248	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	288	9	101
249	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	289	9	102
250	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	290	9	141
251	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	291	9	142
252	LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure				17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known; use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	17 LBridge2a abandoned irrigation structure all Flow Diversion Upstream all 50 NA 5 LFA 2000, PWI 2003; Nothing is known;use 50 % hypothetical until further info is available, HWG 2003	4	169	292	9	162
258	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	298	9	31
259	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	299	9	32
260	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	300	9	61
261	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	301	9	62
262	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	302	9	101
263	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	303	9	102
264	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	304	9	141
265	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	305	9	142
266	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 1 lowest 50 NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise we need to keep it on the map and model potential effects	5	143	306	9	162
267	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	307	1	31
268	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	308	1	5
269	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	309	1	61
270	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	310	1	101
271	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	311	1	162
272	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	312	9	31
273	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	313	9	32
274	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	314	9	61
275	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	315	9	62
276	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	316	9	101
277	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	317	9	102
278	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	318	9	141
279	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	319	9	142
280	LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam				18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA3 LFA 2000	18 LBridge3a Aspen meadows diversion dam all Flow Diversion Upstream all 0 NA 3 LFA 2000	5	175	320	9	162
290	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	330	1	31
291	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	331	1	5
292	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	332	1	61
293	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	333	1	101
294	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	334	1	162
295	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	335	9	31
296	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	336	9	32
297	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	337	9	61
298	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	338	9	62
299	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	339	9	101
300	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	340	9	102
301	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	341	9	141
302	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	342	9	142
303	Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420				19 Eagle1a Culvert at FS Rd.4420 all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS		3	205	343	9	162
304	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992) Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)	5	143	344	1	31
305	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992) Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)	5	143	345	1	5
306	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992) Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)	5	143	346	1	61
307	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992) Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)	5	143	347	1	101
308	Twisp 3a MVID diversion				Twisp 3a MVID diversion	15 Twisp 3a MVID diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992) Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)  Adult Flow Diversion Upstream 2 lowest 25% NA 5 HWG 2003; it is not known if the diversion fully blocks the channel during low flow.  There is thought to be some potential impact of the diversion, until it is proven otherwise use diverted Q/ total low flow Q 16/63 =.25 (Mullen et al. 1992)	5	143	348	1	162
309	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	349	1	31
310	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	350	1	5
311	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	351	1	61
312	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	352	1	101
313	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	353	1	162
314	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	354	9	31
315	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	355	9	32
316	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	356	9	61
317	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	357	9	62
318	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	358	9	101
319	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	359	9	102
320	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	360	9	141
321	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	361	9	142
322	Reynolds1a Culvert				20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	20 Reynolds1a Culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 USFS	3	223	362	9	162
323	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	363	1	31
324	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	364	1	5
325	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	365	1	61
326	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	366	1	101
327	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	367	1	162
328	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	368	9	31
329	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	369	9	32
330	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	370	9	61
331	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	371	9	62
332	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	372	9	101
333	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	373	9	102
334	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	374	9	141
335	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	375	9	142
336	Twisp River Falls				At RM 31	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	240	376	9	162
337	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	377	1	31
338	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	378	1	5
339	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	379	1	61
340	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	380	1	101
341	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	381	1	162
342	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	382	9	31
343	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	383	9	32
344	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	384	9	61
345	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	385	9	62
346	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	386	9	101
347	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	387	9	102
348	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	388	9	141
349	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	389	9	142
350	21 Twisp17a Falls				21 Twisp17a Falls all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	21 Twisp17a Falls   all Culvert Upstream all 0 NA 3 No passage for steelhead, PWI 2003	1	239	390	9	162
351	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	391	1	31
352	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	392	1	5
353	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	393	1	61
354	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	394	1	101
355	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	395	1	162
356	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	396	9	31
357	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	397	9	32
358	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	398	9	61
359	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	399	9	62
360	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	400	9	101
361	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	401	9	102
362	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	402	9	141
363	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	403	9	142
364	Met 11a  MVID East Canal diversion				22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion	22 Met 11a MVID East Canal diversion Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream June-Sep 0.4 NA 5 LFA says not in compliance -the screen is bad and ladder is ineffective, HWG 2003. use 40 % for juveniles (220 cfs diversion / 362 cfs avg. low flow Methow R.)upstream and downstream effects on all juveniles	5	432	404	9	162
370	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	410	9	31
371	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	411	9	32
372	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	412	9	61
373	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	413	9	62
374	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	414	9	101
375	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	415	9	102
376	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	416	9	141
377	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	417	9	142
378	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	418	9	162
379	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	419	1	31
380	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	420	1	5
381	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	421	1	61
382	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	422	1	101
383	Bear 1a   Culvert Complex (6 culverts)				23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 Fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001	23 Bear 1a Culvert Complex (6 culverts) Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001, there is also a drop structure at the mouth, we did not include it in the reach structure but it should count as part of the complex Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 Gower and Espie 2001 Adult Culvert Upstream  0.001 NA 3 33^6 = cumulative effect of 6 culverts with 33 % passage	3	251	423	1	162
384	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	424	1	31
385	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	425	1	5
386	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	426	1	61
387	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	427	1	101
388	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	428	1	162
389	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	429	9	31
390	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	430	9	32
391	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	431	9	61
392	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	432	9	62
393	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	433	9	101
394	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	434	9	102
395	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	435	9	141
396	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	436	9	142
397	Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion				24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	24 Chew 4a Chewuch Diversion Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream  0.46 NA 5 The ladder is not effective for juveniles distributing upstream; 46 % is based on diversion/flow	5	273	437	9	162
403	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	443	1	31
404	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	444	1	5
405	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	445	1	61
406	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	446	1	101
407	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	447	1	162
408	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	448	9	31
409	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	449	9	32
410	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	450	9	61
411	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	451	9	62
412	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	452	9	101
413	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	453	9	102
414	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	454	9	141
415	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	455	9	142
416	Eight 1  Lucille Mason Ditch				Eight 1 Confluence with Chewuch Lucille Mason Ditch	Eight 1   Lucille Mason Ditch 2 2.5   1 3     Effects of diversion are not known. Diversion/stream flow not calculated, assume small impact because of low volume (0.5 cfs)  Eight 1a Lucille Mason Ditch Emergent Fry Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Downstream 2 highest 95 NA 4 No head gate, the effect is opinion HWG 2003	5	289	456	9	162
417	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	457	1	31
418	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	458	1	5
419	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	459	1	61
420	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	460	1	101
421	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	461	1	162
422	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	462	9	31
423	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	463	9	32
424	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	464	9	61
425	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	465	9	62
426	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	466	9	101
427	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	467	9	102
428	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	468	9	141
429	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	469	9	142
430	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction				Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream 0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream 0 NA4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003	Eight 2a Cascades obstruction Age-0 fingerling Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Waterfall Upstream  0 NA 4 LFA 2000, HWG 2003 Adult Waterfall Upstream  33 NA 4 passage unknown but suspected, 33% (opinion); 2 USFS surveys (1992,1999) were conducted but no steelhead observed (LFA 2000)	1	295	470	9	162
441	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	481	1	31
442	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	482	1	5
443	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	483	1	61
444	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	484	1	101
445	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	485	1	162
446	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	486	9	31
447	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	487	9	32
448	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	488	9	61
449	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	489	9	62
450	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	490	9	101
451	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	491	9	102
452	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	492	9	141
453	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	493	9	142
454	Wolf 2a   WCRD diversion dam				27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003 Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	27 Wolf 2a WCRD diversion dam Age-0 fingerling Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003  Age-1 Juvenile Flow Diversion Upstream 2 highest 66 2 4 HWG 2003	5	355	494	9	162
460	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	500	1	31
461	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	501	1	5
462	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	502	1	61
463	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	503	1	101
464	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	504	1	162
465	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	505	9	31
466	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	506	9	32
467	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	507	9	61
468	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	508	9	62
469	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	509	9	101
470	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	510	9	102
471	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	511	9	141
472	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	512	9	142
473	Methow R. Falls				Falls above Brush Ck.		1	430	513	9	162
17	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	17	1	61
18	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	18	1	101
19	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	19	1	162
20	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	20	9	31
21	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	21	9	32
22	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	22	9	61
23	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	23	9	62
24	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	24	9	101
25	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	25	9	102
26	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	26	9	141
27	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	27	9	142
28	Black Canyon 2a				2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010	BlkC 2a 2nd crossing of FS Rd. 4010 culvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream 0 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	15	28	9	162
34	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	34	9	31
35	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	35	9	32
36	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	36	9	61
37	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	37	9	62
38	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	38	9	101
39	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	39	9	102
40	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	40	9	141
41	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	41	9	142
42	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	42	9	162
43	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	43	1	31
44	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	44	1	5
45	Black Canyon 3a				2nd crossing of USFS road 4010	BlkC 3a 2ndCulvert Age-0 fingerling Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Age-1 Juvenile Culvert Upstream  0 NA 3 SSHIAP  Adult Culvert Upstream  33 NA 3 SSHIAP	3	21	45	1	61
