1	Casey Baldwin	Assumed to be somewhat cooler  than the current temperatures at the USGS guage in the free flowing reach at the USGS guage at RM 5.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
2	CB	No data; assumed to be higher than free flowing reach in RM 5.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
3	Casey Baldwin	Assumed to be slightly cooler than current conditions due to within-reach and upstream loss of riparian function, withdrawls, etc..	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
4	CB	extrapolated from guage at RM 5	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	2		
5	CB	assume that it should be slightly cooler than current due to diversions and/or  loss of riparian function.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
6	CB	USGS guaging station in this reach.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
7	CB	extrapolated from USFS thermister 1996 in SF Gold Ck.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	5		
8	CB	USFS thermister 1996	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
9	CB	extrapolated from USFS thermister 1996 and it should be slightly cooler due to past and present land use practices, and loss of riparian function.	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
10	CB	assume the same as current	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
11	CB	average of upstream and downstream sites	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	2		
12	CB	extrapolated from upstream site	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	2		
13	Casey Baldwin	Gauging station showed no long term trends, no high flow measurements are available for pre-development.  Used Road density as an indicator to scale the score between a 2 and 3  (if < 2.5 mi/mi^2 then no impact)(2.5-6 mi/mi^2= EDT score 2.25-3.25)	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
14	Casey Baldwin	default value for template	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
15	Casey Baldwin	Wells Pool effect	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
16	Casey B	No change from normative	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
17	CB	measured in Terrain Navigator	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
18	Casey Baldwin	measured at multiple locations with a laser rangefinder	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
19	CB	Metal concentrations at 2 USGS gauging stations (Methow RM 5,39) were below toxicity standards (USEPA 1986).  If it was not elevated near Twisp (Alder Mine) then it is not likely to be elevated anywhere in the basin (D. Peplow, personal communication).	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	4		
20	CB	USGS gauging station RM 5, all levels below toxicity standards (USEPA 1986)	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	1		
21	CB	Nothing on the 303 d list	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	2		
22	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/31/2003	10/31/2003	3		
23	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/31/2003	10/31/2003	3		
24	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
25	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
26	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
27	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
28	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
29	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
30	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
31	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
32	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
33	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
34	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
35	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
36	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
37	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
38	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
39	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
40	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
41	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
42	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
43	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
44	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
45	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
46	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
47	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
48	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
49	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/05/2003	11/05/2003	3		
50	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
51	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
52	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/02/2003	12/02/2003	3		
53	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/02/2003	12/02/2003	3		
54	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/03/2003	12/03/2003	3		
55	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/03/2003	12/03/2003	3		
56	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/04/2003	12/04/2003	3		
57	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/04/2003	12/04/2003	3		
58	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/05/2003	12/05/2003	3		
59	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/05/2003	12/05/2003	3		
60	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/10/2003	12/10/2003	3		
61	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/10/2003	12/10/2003	3		
62	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/10/2003	12/10/2003	3		
63	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/10/2003	12/10/2003	3		
64	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	02/13/2004	02/13/2004	3		
65	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	02/13/2004	02/13/2004	3		
66	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	02/13/2004	02/13/2004	3		
67	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	02/13/2004	02/13/2004	3		
68	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	09/21/2004	09/21/2004	3		99
69	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	09/21/2004	09/21/2004	3		99
70	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	01/25/2005	01/25/2005	3		99
71	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	01/25/2005	01/25/2005	3		99
72	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	01/25/2005	01/25/2005	3		99
73	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	01/25/2005	01/25/2005	3		99
