1	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/17/2003	9/17/2003	3		
2	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/17/2003	9/17/2003	3		
3	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
4	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
5	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
6	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
7	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
8	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/28/2003	10/28/2003	3		
9	From Excel	No comment	10/31/2003	10/31/2003			
10	From Excel	Wachtel. From Ecology monitoring stations.	10/31/2003	10/31/2003			
11	From Excel	No comment	10/31/2003	10/31/2003			
12	From Excel	No comment	10/31/2003	10/31/2003			
13	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/31/2003	10/31/2003	3		
14	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/31/2003	10/31/2003	3		
15			11/3/2003	11/3/2003			
16	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/14/2003	11/14/2003	3		
17	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/14/2003	11/14/2003	3		
18	bdw	Reduced impact from 2.5 to 0.6 -- insufficient rainfall, probably insufficient TIA (BDW 11/15/030	11/17/2003	11/17/2003	4		
19	bdw	Reduced impact from 2.5 to 0.8 (bdw 11/14/03).	11/17/2003	11/17/2003	4		
20			11/17/2003	11/17/2003			
21	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/18/2003	11/18/2003	3		
22	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/18/2003	11/18/2003	3		
23	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
24	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
25	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
26	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
27	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
28	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/19/2003	11/19/2003	3		
29	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/21/2003	11/21/2003	3		
30	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/21/2003	11/21/2003	3		
31	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	11/22/2003	11/22/2003	3		
32	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	11/22/2003	11/22/2003	3		
33	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	1/20/2004	1/20/2004	3		
34	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	1/20/2004	1/20/2004	3		
35	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	1/20/2004	1/20/2004	3		
36	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	1/20/2004	1/20/2004	3		
37	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	7/15/2004	7/15/2004	3		99
38	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	7/15/2004	7/15/2004	3		99
39	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	7/15/2004	7/15/2004	3		99
40	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	7/15/2004	7/15/2004	3		99
41	Jesse Schwartz	From Paul Sankovich data.  Previously listed as a highly confined reach, but this particular reach has a significantly more open valley structure than the reaches above and below it.	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	1		2
42	Jesse Schwartz	Earlier estimates showed data entry or interpolation error.  Used Contor et al (2003) to upade widths	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	1		1
43	Jesse Schwartz	Revised based on CTUIR (Contor, 2003) thermistor data	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	1		1
44	Jesse Schwartz	Walla Walla TMDL data	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		2
45	Jesse Schwartz	Eric Pfeifer WWBWC historic estimates of channel length	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		2
46	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		99
47	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		99
48	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		99
49	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/10/2004	10/10/2004	3		99
50	Jesse Schwartz	this reach intermediate of Yellowhawk and Bennington. Incorrectly rated as 4.0.  3.0 based on hydrograph data.	10/11/2004	10/11/2004			
51	Jesse Schwartz	Though it is unclear precisely what the riparian communities of Mill Creek looked like, it is well documented that the forest upstream of these reaches were robust and productive, and that logs were aplenty downstream of these forests.  So were beaver and beaver dams.	10/11/2004	10/11/2004			
52	Jesse Schwartz	OSU data suggests macro-inverts available in higher numbers than a 3 for all WW, MC, Touch mainstem reaches	10/11/2004	10/11/2004			
53	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/11/2004	10/11/2004	3		99
54	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/11/2004	10/11/2004	3		99
55	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/11/2004	10/11/2004	3		99
56	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/11/2004	10/11/2004	3		99
57	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	10/12/2004	10/12/2004	3		99
58	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	10/12/2004	10/12/2004	3		99
59	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	12/8/2004	12/8/2004	3		99
60	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	12/8/2004	12/8/2004	3		99
61	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	8/1/2005	8/1/2005	3		99
62	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	8/1/2005	8/1/2005	3		99
