1	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
2	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
27	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
28	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
29	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
30	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
31	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
32	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
33	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
34	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
35	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:53:20 AM		4		
36	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:53:20 AM		4		
37	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
38	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
39	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
40	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
41	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
42	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
43	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
44	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
45	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
46	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
47	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
48	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
49	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
50	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
51	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
52	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
53		'Kinney and Lampo 2002 document 12 barriers, but aren't specific as to their location.'	9/20/2002 10:45:59 AM		2		
54		'Kinney and Lampo 2002 document 12 barriers, but aren't specific as to their location.'	9/20/2002 10:45:59 AM		2		
55	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
56	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
57	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
58	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
59	WG	'Based on proposed outplantting of adults'	9/20/2002 3:48:32 PM		3		
60	WG	'Based on proposed outplantting of adults'	9/20/2002 3:48:32 PM		4		
61	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
62	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
63	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS)'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
64	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS)'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
3	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
4	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
5	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
6	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
7	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Ape Canyon as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/20/2002 10:43:44 AM		3		
8	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Ape Canyon as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/20/2002 10:43:44 AM		3		
9	NKA	''	9/20/2002 10:40:38 AM		3		
10	NKA	''	9/20/2002 10:40:38 AM		3		
11	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
12	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
13	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
14	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
15	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Muddy River watershed analysis (1995). Changed to relfect the fact that Ape Canyon Creek is in blast Zone of mt.St.Helens for Patient Condition.'	2/14/2003 7:59:14 AM		3		
16	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Muddy River watershed analysis (1995). Changed to relfect the fact that Ape Canyon Creek is in blast Zone of mt.St.Helens for Patient Condition.'	2/14/2003 7:59:14 AM		4		
17	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
18	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		2		
19	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
65	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
66	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		4		
84	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
85	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
86	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
87	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
88	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
89	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
90	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
91	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
92	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
93	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		1		
94	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
95	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
96	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
97	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
98	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
99	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
100	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
101	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
102	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
103	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
104	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
105	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:45:08 AM		4		
106	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:45:08 AM		4		
107	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
108	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
109	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
110	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
111	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
112	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
113	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:43:44 AM		3		
114	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:43:44 AM		3		
115	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
116	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
117	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
118	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
119	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
120	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
121	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
122	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
123	NKA	'Pacific Corp. says there is a 6.5 foot falls at 0.5 miles'	9/20/2002 12:48:06 PM		1		
124	NKA	'Pacific Corp. says there is a 6.5 foot falls at 0.5 miles'	9/20/2002 12:48:06 PM		2		
125	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		2		
126	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		2		
127	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:54:58 AM		2		
128	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:54:58 AM		2		
129	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:33 AM		3		
130	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:33 AM		3		
131	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
132	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
133	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
134	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
135	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
136	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
137	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:54:13 AM		4		
138	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:54:13 AM		4		
139	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
140	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
141	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		1		
142	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
143	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		1		
144	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
145	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
146	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
147	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
148	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
149	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
150	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
151	NKA	'Pacific Corp report map classifies as Bean Cr. as Rosgen B/C.'	9/20/2002 10:35:21 AM		2		
152	NKA	'Pacific Corp report map classifies as Bean Cr. as Rosgen B/C.'	9/20/2002 10:35:21 AM		3		
153		'Map indicates relatively little road influence on the creek.'	9/20/2002 10:36:14 AM		2		
154		'Map indicates relatively little road influence on the creek.'	9/20/2002 10:36:14 AM		2		
155	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
156	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
157	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 10:29:05 AM		4		
158	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 10:29:05 AM		4		
159	WG	'Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 10:28:59 AM		4		
160	WG	'Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 10:28:59 AM		4		
161	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
162	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
163	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
164	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		2		
165	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:33:23 AM		1		
166	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:33:23 AM		3		
167	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
168	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		1		
169	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
170	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
171	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
172	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
173	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
174	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
175	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
176	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
177	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:53:53 AM		4		
178	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:53:53 AM		4		
179	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
180	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
181	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
182	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
183	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
184	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
185	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
186	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
187	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
188	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
189	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
190	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
191	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
192	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
193	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
194	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
195	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo document 13 barriers on Bean Cr., but aren't specific as to their location.'	9/20/2002 10:31:45 AM		1		
196	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo document 13 barriers on Bean Cr., but aren't specific as to their location.'	9/20/2002 10:31:45 AM		2		
197	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
198	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
199	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 10:32:21 AM		3		
200	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 10:32:21 AM		3		
201	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
202	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		3		
203	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
204	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
205	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
206	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:18 AM		4		
207	WG	'Rosgen B/C may have some groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:53:52 AM		4		
208	WG	'Rosgen B/C may have some groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:53:52 AM		4		
209	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:20 AM		4		
210	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:20 AM		4		
211	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 80 pieces/mile in Bean Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/26/2002 7:54:38 AM		2		
212	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 80 pieces/mile in Bean Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/26/2002 7:54:38 AM		4		
213	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:36:54 AM		1		
214	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:36:54 AM		3		
215	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:01:27 PM		3		
216	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:01:27 PM		4		
217	nka	'Assumed same as Drift, Swift and Pine'	9/2/2002 9:19:26 AM		3		
218	nka	'Assumed same as Drift, Swift and Pine'	9/2/2002 9:19:26 AM		3		
219	NKA	'VALLEY BOTTOM 1-1.5x ACTIVE CHANNEL WIDTH (USFS REPORT)'	8/28/2002 9:22:01 AM		2		
220	NKA	'VALLEY BOTTOM 1-1.5x ACTIVE CHANNEL WIDTH (USFS REPORT)'	8/28/2002 9:22:01 AM		4		
221	nka	'No modifications in the lower 0.4mi.'	9/2/2002 9:21:42 AM		2		
222	nka	'No modifications in the lower 0.4mi.'	9/2/2002 9:21:42 AM		2		
223	nka	'Assumed same as Drift and Swift.'	9/2/2002 9:19:12 AM		3		
224	nka	'Assumed same as Drift and Swift.'	9/2/2002 9:19:12 AM		3		
225	NKA	'BASED ON % FINES'	8/28/2002 9:05:14 AM		3		
226	NKA	'BASED ON % FINES'	8/28/2002 9:05:14 AM		3		
227	NKA	'USFS FOUND 1% FINES IN REACH DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS ONE.  DID NOT SURVEY THIS REACH'	8/28/2002 9:04:45 AM		2		
228	NKA	'USFS FOUND 1% FINES IN REACH DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS ONE.  DID NOT SURVEY THIS REACH'	8/28/2002 9:04:45 AM		4		
229	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS PRESENCE OF RAINBOW AND BROOK TROUT'	8/28/2002 9:23:32 AM		2		
230	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS PRESENCE OF RAINBOW AND BROOK TROUT'	8/28/2002 9:23:32 AM		4		
231	nka	'Lewis River hatchery'	9/2/2002 9:20:14 AM		2		
232	nka	'Lewis River hatchery'	9/2/2002 9:20:14 AM		3		
233	NKA	'BROOK TROUT'	8/28/2002 9:23:52 AM		1		
234	NKA	'BROOK TROUT'	8/28/2002 9:23:52 AM		4		
235	NKA	'USFS REPORTS 10% GRADIENT'	8/28/2002 9:21:18 AM		2		
236	NKA	'USFS REPORTS 10% GRADIENT'	8/28/2002 9:21:18 AM		4		
237	nka	'Lewis River hatchery'	9/2/2002 9:20:06 AM		2		
238	nka	'Lewis River hatchery'	9/2/2002 9:20:06 AM		3		
239	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 86% RIFFLE WITH SUBSTRATE DOMINATED BY BOULDERS, RUBBLE AND COBBLE'	8/28/2002 9:01:04 AM		2		
240	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 86% RIFFLE WITH SUBSTRATE DOMINATED BY BOULDERS, RUBBLE AND COBBLE'	8/28/2002 9:01:04 AM		3		
241	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS 5% SIDE CHANNEL HABITAT'	8/28/2002 9:02:48 AM		2		
242	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS 5% SIDE CHANNEL HABITAT'	8/28/2002 9:02:48 AM		4		
243	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 10% POOLS'	8/28/2002 9:01:50 AM		2		
244	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 10% POOLS'	8/28/2002 9:01:50 AM		3		
245	NKA	'BASED ON % POOLS'	8/28/2002 9:02:02 AM		2		
246	NKA	'BASED ON % POOLS'	8/28/2002 9:02:02 AM		3		
247	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 86% RIFFLE WITH SUBSTRATE DOMINATED BY BOULDERS, RUBBLE AND COBBLE'	8/28/2002 9:01:18 AM		2		
248	NKA	'USFS SURVEYED DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS REACH.  FOUND 86% RIFFLE WITH SUBSTRATE DOMINATED BY BOULDERS, RUBBLE AND COBBLE'	8/28/2002 9:01:18 AM		3		
249	NKA	'WESTERN CASCADE STREAM'	8/28/2002 8:57:59 AM		3		
250	NKA	'WESTERN CASCADE STREAM'	8/28/2002 8:57:59 AM		3		
251	 NKA	'25 FT WATERFALL AT RM0.33 (USFS STREAM SURVEY REPORT)'	8/28/2002 9:20:20 AM		1		
252	 NKA	'25 FT WATERFALL AT RM0.33 (USFS STREAM SURVEY REPORT)'	8/28/2002 9:20:20 AM		2		
253	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS THAT AERIAL PHOTOS SHOW 19% OLD GROWTH, 34% MATURE TIMBER, 43% GRASSES AND SHRUBS, AND 6% HARDWOOD'	8/28/2002 9:17:55 AM		2		
254	NKA	'USFS DOCUMENTS THAT AERIAL PHOTOS SHOW 19% OLD GROWTH, 34% MATURE TIMBER, 43% GRASSES AND SHRUBS, AND 6% HARDWOOD'	8/28/2002 9:17:55 AM		4		
255	NKA	'USFS STREAM SURVEY REPORTS AVERAGE TEMP DURING SUMMER SURVEYS WAS 9.5 DEG CELCIUS'	8/28/2002 8:57:31 AM		2		
256	NKA	'USFS STREAM SURVEY REPORTS AVERAGE TEMP DURING SUMMER SURVEYS WAS 9.5 DEG CELCIUS'	8/28/2002 8:57:31 AM		4		
257	NKA	'USFS RANKS LWD ABUNDANCE AS MODERATE.  LWD IN PLACE IS CREATING POOL HABITAT.'	8/28/2002 9:18:43 AM		2		
258	NKA	'USFS RANKS LWD ABUNDANCE AS MODERATE.  LWD IN PLACE IS CREATING POOL HABITAT.'	8/28/2002 9:18:43 AM		4		
259	NKA	'USFS ONLY SURVEYED ABOVE THIS REACH.  THE WETTED WIDTH OF THE REACH JUST ABOVE THIS ONE WAS 31 FT.  I ASSUMED THIS REACH WAS SLIGHTLY WIDER.'	8/28/2002 8:55:42 AM		2		
260	NKA	'USFS ONLY SURVEYED ABOVE THIS REACH.  THE WETTED WIDTH OF THE REACH JUST ABOVE THIS ONE WAS 31 FT.  I ASSUMED THIS REACH WAS SLIGHTLY WIDER.'	8/28/2002 8:55:42 AM		3		
261	NKA	'BASED ON WETTED WIDTH'	8/28/2002 8:55:03 AM		3		
262	NKA	'BASED ON WETTED WIDTH'	8/28/2002 8:55:03 AM		3		
263	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		2		
264	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		4		
265	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		4		
266	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		4		
267	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
268	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
269	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map classifies Big Creek as a Rosgen type A channel.'	9/20/2002 9:05:43 AM		2		
270	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map classifies Big Creek as a Rosgen type A channel.'	9/20/2002 9:05:43 AM		2		
271	NKA	'No road influences in the lower 0.3 mi.'	9/20/2002 9:22:32 AM		2		
272	NKA	'No road influences in the lower 0.3 mi.'	9/20/2002 9:22:32 AM		2		
273	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels. Big Creek D.O. levels ranged from 9.9-13.5.   (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:06:22 AM		2		
274	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels. Big Creek D.O. levels ranged from 9.9-13.5.   (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:06:22 AM		4		
275	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:09:41 AM		3		
276	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:09:41 AM		3		
277	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:09:15 AM		3		
278	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:09:15 AM		3		
279	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
280	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
281	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		2		
282	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		2		
283	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 9:18:35 AM		1		
284	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 9:18:35 AM		3		
285	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
286	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		2		
287	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:08 AM		3		
288	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:08 AM		3		
289	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:15 AM		3		
290	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:15 AM		3		
291	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:00 AM		3		
292	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:16:00 AM		3		
293	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:37 AM		3		
294	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:37 AM		3		
295	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:56:44 AM		3		
296	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:56:44 AM		3		
297	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:48 AM		3		
298	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:48 AM		3		
299	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:54 AM		3		
300	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:54 AM		3		
301	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:43 AM		3		
302	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:15:43 AM		3		
303	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
304	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
305	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
306	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
307	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
308	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
309	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
310	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
311	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
312	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
313	NKA	'100 ft falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 9:21:20 AM		1		
314	NKA	'100 ft falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 9:21:20 AM		2		
315	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
316	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
317	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:03:13 AM		3		
318	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:03:13 AM		3		
319	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
320	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:48:37 AM		3		
321	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents a minimum temperature in Big Creek of 3.3 degrees on 10/31.  Temps were not monitored through the winter.  That was the last day of sampling.  Assumed temps dropped to at least 2.0 degrees in Dec or Jan.'	9/20/2002 8:55:17 AM		2		
322	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents a minimum temperature in Big Creek of 3.3 degrees on 10/31.  Temps were not monitored through the winter.  That was the last day of sampling.  Assumed temps dropped to at least 2.0 degrees in Dec or Jan.'	9/20/2002 8:55:17 AM		4		
323	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report documents that from 8/9/94-10/31/94 a max temp of 14 was recorded on 8/11-8/13.'	9/20/2002 8:51:55 AM		2		
324	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report documents that from 8/9/94-10/31/94 a max temp of 14 was recorded on 8/11-8/13.'	9/20/2002 8:51:55 AM		4		
325	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:04:50 AM		3		
326	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:04:50 AM		3		
327	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 8:01:03 AM		3		
328	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 8:01:03 AM		4		
329	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 33 pieces/mile in Big Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:11:08 AM		2		
330	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 33 pieces/mile in Big Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:11:08 AM		3		
331	NKA	'Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:20:21 AM		1		
332	NKA	'Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:20:21 AM		3		
333	NKA	'Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:20:17 AM		1		
334	NKA	'Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:20:17 AM		3		
335	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:54:51 AM		4		
336	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:54:51 AM		4		
337	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/25/2001 3:47:38 PM		4		
338	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/25/2001 3:47:38 PM		4		
339	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
340	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
341	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
342	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
343	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
344	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
345	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as Rosgen A/B.'	9/20/2002 10:55:35 AM		2		
346	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as Rosgen A/B.'	9/20/2002 10:55:35 AM		3		
347	NKA	'Map indicates limited road influences.'	9/20/2002 10:58:48 AM		3		
348	NKA	'Map indicates limited road influences.'	9/20/2002 10:58:48 AM		2		
349	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
350	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
351	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
352	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
353	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
354	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
355	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
356	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
357	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
358	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		2		
359	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:57:06 AM		1		
360	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:57:06 AM		3		
361	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
362	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		2		
363	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
364	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
365	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
366	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
367	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
368	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
369	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
370	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
371		'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/26/2002 8:11:00 AM		4		
372		'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/26/2002 8:11:00 AM		4		
373	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
374	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
375	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
376	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
377	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
378	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
379	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:37 AM		3		
380	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:37 AM		3		
381	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
382	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
383	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
384	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
385	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
386	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
387	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
388	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
389	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 10:55:00 AM		1		
390	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 10:55:00 AM		2		
391	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
392	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		3		
393	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:05:43 AM		4		
394	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:05:43 AM		4		
395	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:05 AM		3		
396	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:05 AM		3		
397	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
398	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
399	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
400	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
401	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:56:04 AM		3		
402	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:56:04 AM		3		
403	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:36 AM		4		
404	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:36 AM		4		
405	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
406	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:31 AM		4		
407	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 8:07:51 AM		1		
408	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 8:07:51 AM		3		
409	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/26/2002 8:07:39 AM		1		
410	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/26/2002 8:07:39 AM		3		
411	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:42:01 AM		4		
412	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:42:01 AM		4		
413	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
414	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
415	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
416	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
417	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
418	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
419	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Buncombe Hollow as Rosgen A/B.'	9/20/2002 10:24:40 AM		2		
420	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Buncombe Hollow as Rosgen A/B.'	9/20/2002 10:24:40 AM		3		
421	NKA	'Map shows road running along Buncombe Hollow.  Difficult to say if modifications or restrictions have been placed on the stream.'	9/20/2002 10:26:01 AM		3		
422	NKA	'Map shows road running along Buncombe Hollow.  Difficult to say if modifications or restrictions have been placed on the stream.'	9/20/2002 10:26:01 AM		2		
423	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
424	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
425	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
426	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
427	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
428	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
429	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
430	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
431	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
432	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
433	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:26:44 AM		1		
434	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:26:44 AM		3		
435	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
436	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		2		
437	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
438	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
439	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
440	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
441	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
442	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
443	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
444	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
445	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/26/2002 8:12:24 AM		4		
446	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/26/2002 8:12:24 AM		4		
447	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
448	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
449	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
450	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
451	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
452	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
453	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:05 AM		3		
454	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:05 AM		3		
455	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
456	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
457	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
458	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
459	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
460	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
461	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
462	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
463	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers other than low flow.'	9/20/2002 10:23:58 AM		1		
464	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers other than low flow.'	9/20/2002 10:23:58 AM		2		
465	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
466	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
467	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:13:57 AM		3		
468	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:13:57 AM		3		
469	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:17 AM		3		
470	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:17 AM		3		
471	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
472	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
473	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
474	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
475	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
476	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		3		
477	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:46 AM		4		
478	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:21:46 AM		4		
479	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		2		
480	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:46:52 AM		4		
481	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:27:18 AM		1		
482	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:27:18 AM		3		
483	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:27:14 AM		1		
484	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:27:14 AM		3		
485	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
486	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
487	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
488	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
489	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
490	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
491	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
492	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
493	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
494	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
495	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
496	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
497	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:23:26 AM		3		
498	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:23:26 AM		3		
499	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
500	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
501	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:23:18 AM		3		
502	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:23:18 AM		4		
503	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
504	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
505	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
506	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
507	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
508	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
509	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		1		
510	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
511	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
512	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
513	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
514	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
515	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
516	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
517	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
518	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
519	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
520	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
521	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
522	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
523	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
524	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
525	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
526	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
527	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
528	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
529	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
530	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
531	WG	'Same as other Merwin Tribs'	2/11/2003 7:56:09 AM		3		
532	WG	'Same as other Merwin Tribs'	2/11/2003 7:56:09 AM		3		
533	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
534	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
535	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
536	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
537	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
538	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
539	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
540	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
541	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
542	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
543	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
544	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
545	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
546	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
547	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
548	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
549	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
550	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
551	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
552	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
553	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
554	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
555	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
556	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
557	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
558	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		3		
559		''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		1		
560		''	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
561	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		2		
562	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:26 AM		4		
563	KM	'Changed widths to reflect upstream reach'	2/11/2003 8:22:23 AM		2		
564	KM	'Changed widths to reflect upstream reach'	2/11/2003 8:22:23 AM		4		
565	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 11-23mg/L at the mouth of Canyon Cr..  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/24/2002 2:02:19 PM		3		
566	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 11-23mg/L at the mouth of Canyon Cr..  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/24/2002 2:02:19 PM		3		
567	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		4		
568	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		4		
569	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
570	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
571	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map shows the lowest section of Canyon Cr. as a Rosgen B.  Only used this section of the Creek because of the documentation of barriers in the lower 1000 ft of Canyon Cr.'	9/24/2002 2:37:18 PM		3		
572	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map shows the lowest section of Canyon Cr. as a Rosgen B.  Only used this section of the Creek because of the documentation of barriers in the lower 1000 ft of Canyon Cr.'	9/24/2002 2:37:18 PM		3		
573	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
574	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
575	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
576	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
577	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/24/2002 2:28:43 PM		3		
578	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/24/2002 2:28:43 PM		3		
579	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/24/2002 2:28:36 PM		3		
580	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/24/2002 2:28:36 PM		3		
581	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
582	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
583	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
584	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
585	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
586	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
587		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents a gradient of 0.1% in the lower 1000 feet of Canyon Cr.'	9/25/2002 1:44:48 PM		1		
588		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents a gradient of 0.1% in the lower 1000 feet of Canyon Cr.'	9/25/2002 1:44:48 PM		2		
589	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
590	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
591	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
592	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
593	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
594	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
595	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:45:01 PM		4		
596	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:45:01 PM		4		
597	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/24/2002 2:33:55 PM		3		
598	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/24/2002 2:33:55 PM		3		
599	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
600	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
601	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
602	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
603	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
604	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
605	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
606	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
607	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports the following "Numerous waterfalls throughouth the lower 1,000 feet likely block anadromous fish access into Canyon Creek.  One of these falls is approximately 18-20 feet high.  This falls was not verified int 1999 or 2000 due to difficult and dangerous access."'	9/24/2002 2:31:42 PM		2		
608	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports the following "Numerous waterfalls throughouth the lower 1,000 feet likely block anadromous fish access into Canyon Creek.  One of these falls is approximately 18-20 feet high.  This falls was not verified int 1999 or 2000 due to difficult and dangerous access."'	9/24/2002 2:31:42 PM		2		
609	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
610	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		2		
611	WG	'Rating assigned by WG because of logging outside the NF.'	9/24/2002 2:03:22 PM		3		
612	WG	'Rating assigned by WG because of logging outside the NF.'	9/24/2002 2:03:22 PM		3		
613	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
614	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
615	NKA	'Sampling by Pacific Corp in the winter of 99-00 showed a minimum temperature of 3.2 on 12/30/99.'	9/24/2002 2:26:48 PM		2		
616	NKA	'Sampling by Pacific Corp in the winter of 99-00 showed a minimum temperature of 3.2 on 12/30/99.'	9/24/2002 2:26:48 PM		4		
617	NKA	'Temperature monitoring by Pacific Corp showed that temps exceeded 16 degrees 43 times in 1999 with a max temp of 19.5. Patient:  Assumed cooler because of lack of increased riparian shading.'	9/24/2002 2:24:52 PM		2		
618	NKA	'Temperature monitoring by Pacific Corp showed that temps exceeded 16 degrees 43 times in 1999 with a max temp of 19.5. Patient:  Assumed cooler because of lack of increased riparian shading.'	9/24/2002 2:24:52 PM		4		
619	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
620	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		3		
621	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report reported 0.1 - 1.3 NTU. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.  WG assigned rating of 1.5'	9/24/2002 2:01:02 PM		2		
622	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report reported 0.1 - 1.3 NTU. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.  WG assigned rating of 1.5'	9/24/2002 2:01:02 PM		2		
623	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		4		
624	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/24/2002 1:55:41 PM		4		
625	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
626	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
627	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
628	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
629	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
630	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
631	NKA	'Pacific Corp map classifies Cape Horn as a Rosgen A channel'	9/24/2002 9:59:07 AM		3		
632	NKA	'Pacific Corp map classifies Cape Horn as a Rosgen A channel'	9/24/2002 9:59:07 AM		3		
633	NKA	'Map indicates there are no road influences in the lower 0.3 miles.'	9/20/2002 10:07:06 AM		2		
634	NKA	'Map indicates there are no road influences in the lower 0.3 miles.'	9/20/2002 10:07:06 AM		2		
635	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
636	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
637	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
638	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
639	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
640	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
641	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
642	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
643	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
644	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		2		
645	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:03 AM		1		
646	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:03 AM		3		
647	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
648	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		2		
649	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
650	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
651	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
652	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
653	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
654	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
655	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
656	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
657	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:58:47 AM		4		
658	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:58:47 AM		4		
659	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
660	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
661	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
662	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
663	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
664	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
665	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:41:49 AM		3		
666	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:41:49 AM		3		
667	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
668	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
669	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
670	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
671	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
672	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
673	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
674	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
675	NKA	'60 ft falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 10:03:53 AM		1		
676	NKA	'60 ft falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 10:03:53 AM		2		
677	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
678	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
679	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:21:44 AM		4		
680	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:21:44 AM		4		
681	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:27 AM		3		
682	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:27 AM		3		
683	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
684	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
685	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
686	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
687	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
688	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		3		
689	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:03 AM		4		
690	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:03 AM		4		
691	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
692	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:18:59 AM		4		
693	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:26 AM		1		
694	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:26 AM		3		
695	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:18 AM		1		
696	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 10:05:18 AM		3		
697	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 10:36:40 AM		4		
698	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 10:36:40 AM		4		
699	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 1 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 10:45:49 AM		4		
700	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 1 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 10:45:49 AM		4		
701	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:45 PM		3		
702	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:45 PM		3		
703	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:28:16 PM		4		
704	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:28:16 PM		4		
705	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:06:44 AM		3		
706	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:06:44 AM		3		
707	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map classifies Chickoon as a Rosgen A stream.'	9/24/2002 10:01:21 AM		3		
708	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map classifies Chickoon as a Rosgen A stream.'	9/24/2002 10:01:21 AM		3		
709	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:02:53 PM		3		
710	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:02:53 PM		3		
711	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:16:50 PM		3		
712	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:16:50 PM		3		
713	NKA	'SMALL STREAM LIKELY TO BE IMPACTED BY WINTER FRESHETS'	8/28/2002 10:17:57 AM		3		
714	NKA	'SMALL STREAM LIKELY TO BE IMPACTED BY WINTER FRESHETS'	8/28/2002 10:17:57 AM		4		
715	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:53:24 PM		3		
716	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:53:24 PM		3		
717	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:12:21 AM		3		
718	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:12:21 AM		3		
719	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:33:00 PM		3		
720	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:33:00 PM		2		
721	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 10:17:37 AM		1		
722	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 10:17:37 AM		3		
723	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:21:48 PM		2		
724	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:21:48 PM		2		
725	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:39 PM		3		
726	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:39 PM		2		
727	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:25 PM		3		
728	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:25 PM		3		
729	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:30 PM		3		
730	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:30 PM		3		
731	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:18 PM		3		
732	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:18 PM		3		
733	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:34:55 PM		3		
734	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:34:55 PM		3		
735	WG	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:59:33 AM		4		
736	WG	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 9:59:33 AM		4		
737	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:10 PM		3		
738	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:10 PM		3		
739	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:14 PM		3		
740	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:14 PM		3		
741	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:06 PM		3		
742	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:35:06 PM		3		
743	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:00 AM		3		
744	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:00 AM		3		
745	NKA	'Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/27/2002 10:09:26 AM		3		
746	NKA	'Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/27/2002 10:09:26 AM		3		
747	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:35 PM		3		
748	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:35 PM		3		
749	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:40 PM		3		
750	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:40 PM		3		
751	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:31 PM		3		
752	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:31 PM		3		
753	NKA	'60 FT falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:52:45 PM		1		
754	NKA	'60 FT falls at RM 0.3 (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:52:45 PM		2		
755	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:23:54 AM		3		
756	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:23:54 AM		3		
757	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:16:18 AM		2		
758	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:16:18 AM		2		
759	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:10:29 AM		3		
760	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:10:29 AM		3		
761	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:26:25 PM		4		
762	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:26:25 PM		4		
763	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:08:00 PM		4		
764	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:08:00 PM		4		
765	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:56:05 AM		3		
766	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:56:05 AM		3		
767	NKA	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/16/2002 3:50:36 PM		4		
768	NKA	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/16/2002 3:50:36 PM		4		
769	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 42 pieces/mile in Chickoon Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:06:41 PM		3		
770	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 42 pieces/mile in Chickoon Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:06:41 PM		3		
771	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:51:00 PM		1		
772	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:51:00 PM		3		
773	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:51:04 PM		1		
774	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:51:04 PM		3		
775	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:58 PM		3		
776	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:58 PM		4		
777	KM	'Changed based on Topo Maps showing that lower creek has a slope less than 1%'	11/25/2002 6:49:38 PM		4		
778	KM	'Changed based on Topo Maps showing that lower creek has a slope less than 1%'	11/25/2002 6:49:38 PM		4		
779	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:38:14 AM		3		
780	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:38:14 AM		3		
781	NKA	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:25:02 AM		3		
782	NKA	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:25:02 AM		3		
783	NKA	'Map shows road running along eastern bank'	9/2/2002 10:07:59 AM		2		
784	NKA	'Map shows road running along eastern bank'	9/2/2002 10:07:59 AM		3		
785	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:09:11 PM		3		
786	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:09:11 PM		4		
787	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template.'	9/19/2002 3:50:22 PM		3		
788	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template.'	9/19/2002 3:50:22 PM		3		
789	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/10/2003 9:33:45 PM		3		
790	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/10/2003 9:33:45 PM		4		
791	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:12:32 AM		2		
792	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:12:32 AM		2		
793	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:33:41 PM		3		
794	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:33:41 PM		2		
795	NKA	''	9/2/2002 10:08:36 AM		3		
796	NKA	''	9/2/2002 10:08:36 AM		2		
797	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:20:51 PM		1		
798	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:20:51 PM		3		
799	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:22:08 PM		3		
800	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:22:08 PM		2		
801	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:53 PM		3		
802	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:53 PM		2		
803	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:40 AM		3		
804	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:40 AM		4		
805	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:47 AM		3		
806	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:47 AM		4		
807	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:34 AM		3		
808	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:34 AM		4		
809	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:10 AM		3		
810	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:10 AM		4		
811	KM	'Changed based on topo map and experience on stream'	11/25/2002 6:50:41 PM		4		
812	KM	'Changed based on topo map and experience on stream'	11/25/2002 6:50:41 PM		4		
813	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:24 AM		3		
814	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:24 AM		4		
815	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:29 AM		3		
816	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:29 AM		4		
817	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:15 AM		3		
818	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:54:15 AM		4		
819	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:13 AM		3		
820	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:13 AM		3		
821	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 2:23:42 PM		3		
822	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 2:23:42 PM		3		
823	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:01 PM		3		
824	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:01 PM		3		
825	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:07 PM		3		
826	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:07 PM		3		
827	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:55 PM		3		
828	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:55 PM		3		
829	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn't document any barriers in the lower 8.7 miles.'	9/19/2002 6:45:55 PM		2		
830	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn't document any barriers in the lower 8.7 miles.'	9/19/2002 6:45:55 PM		2		
831	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:24:17 AM		2		
832	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:24:17 AM		2		
833	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 2:36:15 PM		3		
834	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 2:36:15 PM		2		
835	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:11:01 AM		3		
836	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:11:01 AM		3		
837	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/9/94 and 11/1/94.  Min daily temp on 11/1/94 was 4.1 degrees.  I assumed some colder temperature occur in Dec. and Jan.'	9/17/2002 10:04:12 AM		2		
838	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/9/94 and 11/1/94.  Min daily temp on 11/1/94 was 4.1 degrees.  I assumed some colder temperature occur in Dec. and Jan.'	9/17/2002 10:04:12 AM		3		
839	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality study reports temp data from 8/9/94-11/1/94.  Max daily temp of 16 or greater occurred 6 days with a max temp of 16.7.  All of these occurred in August.'	9/17/2002 9:16:46 AM		2		
840	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality study reports temp data from 8/9/94-11/1/94.  Max daily temp of 16 or greater occurred 6 days with a max temp of 16.7.  All of these occurred in August.'	9/17/2002 9:16:46 AM		3		
841	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:58:02 AM		3		
842	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:58:02 AM		3		
843	NKA	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:54:43 PM		3		
844	NKA	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:54:43 PM		3		
845	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:07:29 PM		3		
846	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:07:29 PM		3		
847		''	9/16/2002 1:39:30 PM		1		
848		''	9/16/2002 1:39:30 PM		2		
849	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/26/2002 2:22:26 PM		1		
850	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/26/2002 2:22:26 PM		4		
851	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:57:29 PM		3		
852	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:57:29 PM		4		
853	KM	'Low scour based on low gradient and unconfined channel'	12/5/2002 10:09:01 AM		3		
854	KM	'Low scour based on low gradient and unconfined channel'	12/5/2002 10:09:01 AM		4		
855	KM	'Changed based on Topo Maps'	2/11/2003 8:39:58 AM		2		
856	KM	'Changed based on Topo Maps'	2/11/2003 8:39:58 AM		2		
857	KM	'From Topo Data'	2/11/2003 8:40:23 AM		1		
858	KM	'From Topo Data'	2/11/2003 8:40:23 AM		2		
859	KM	'For all Habitat data see Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 8:39:09 AM		2		
860	KM	'For all Habitat data see Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 8:39:09 AM		4		
861	KM	'Increased based on topo maps and USFS surveys data'	12/5/2002 10:11:31 AM		2		
862	KM	'Increased based on topo maps and USFS surveys data'	12/5/2002 10:11:31 AM		4		
863	KM	'Broke Clear Creek into two reaches to account for Lower Gradient portion of the Creek.  All data came from Clear Creek USFS data adjusted for Gradient, bed scour etc.'	2/11/2003 8:38:28 AM		2		
864	KM	'Broke Clear Creek into two reaches to account for Lower Gradient portion of the Creek.  All data came from Clear Creek USFS data adjusted for Gradient, bed scour etc.'	2/11/2003 8:38:28 AM		4		
865	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
866	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
867	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
868	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
869	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
870	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
871	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
872	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
873	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
874	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
875	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
876	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
877	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
878	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
879	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
880	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
881	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
882	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
883	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
884	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
885	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
886	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
887	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
888	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
889	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		1		
890	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
891	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
892	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
893	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
894	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
895	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
896	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
897	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
898	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
899	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
900	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
901	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
902	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
903	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
904	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
905	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
906	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
907	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
908	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
909	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
910	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
911	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
912	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
913	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
914	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
915	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
916	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
917	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
918	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
919	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
920	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
921	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
922	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
923	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
924	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
925	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
926	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
927	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
928	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
929	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
930	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
931	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
932	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
933	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
934	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
935	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
936	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
937	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
938	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		3		
939		''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		1		
940		''	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
941	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
942	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
943	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		2		
944	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:31 AM		4		
945	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:08 PM		3		
946	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:08 PM		3		
947	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:28:43 PM		4		
948	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:28:43 PM		4		
949	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:38:55 AM		3		
950	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:38:55 AM		3		
951	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.  However, HARZA data classifies the stream as a Rosgen type B/C.'	9/17/2002 7:25:46 AM		2		
952	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.  However, HARZA data classifies the stream as a Rosgen type B/C.'	9/17/2002 7:25:46 AM		2		
953	nka	'Map doesn?t show much influence from roads'	9/2/2002 10:10:53 AM		3		
954	nka	'Map doesn?t show much influence from roads'	9/2/2002 10:10:53 AM		3		
955	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:03:15 PM		3		
956	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:03:15 PM		3		
957	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template.'	9/19/2002 3:49:45 PM		4		
958	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template.'	9/19/2002 3:49:45 PM		4		
959	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See panamaker for historic sediment citation'	2/10/2003 9:25:32 PM		3		
960	WG	'Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See panamaker for historic sediment citation'	2/10/2003 9:25:32 PM		4		
961	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:13:02 AM		3		
962	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:13:02 AM		3		
963	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:35:17 PM		3		
964	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:35:17 PM		2		
965	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/17/2002 2:22:20 PM		1		
966	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/17/2002 2:22:20 PM		3		
967	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:22:18 PM		3		
968	WG	''	9/16/2002 1:22:18 PM		2		
969	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:58:19 PM		3		
970	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:58:19 PM		2		
971		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:38 PM		4		
972		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:38 PM		4		
973		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:41 PM		4		
974		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:41 PM		4		
975		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:33 PM		4		
976		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:33 PM		4		
977	NKA	'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:21 PM		4		
978	NKA	'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:21 PM		4		
979	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:03:23 AM		4		
980	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:03:23 AM		4		
981		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:27 PM		4		
982		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:27 PM		4		
983		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:29 PM		4		
984		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:29 PM		4		
985		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:24 PM		4		
986		'Assumed similar to Clear Cr.'	9/19/2002 7:43:24 PM		4		
987	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:28 AM		3		
988	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:58:28 AM		3		
989	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:02:16 PM		2		
990	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:02:16 PM		2		
991	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:28 PM		3		
992	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:28 PM		3		
993	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:34 PM		3		
994	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:34 PM		3		
995	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:22 PM		3		
996	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:44:22 PM		3		
997		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:48:29 PM		2		
998		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:48:29 PM		2		
999	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:24:38 AM		3		
1000	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:24:38 AM		3		
1001	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 2:36:35 PM		2		
1002	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 2:36:35 PM		2		
1003	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:11:59 AM		3		
1004	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:11:59 AM		3		
1005	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:31:42 PM		3		
1006	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:31:42 PM		4		
1007	NKA	'USFS 2001 Water Quality Monitoring Report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 39 times in 2000.  The max temp recorded was 18.1 degrees. Temp monitor was 8 miles above the Muddy River.'	9/17/2002 4:51:41 PM		2		
1008	NKA	'USFS 2001 Water Quality Monitoring Report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 39 times in 2000.  The max temp recorded was 18.1 degrees. Temp monitor was 8 miles above the Muddy River.'	9/17/2002 4:51:41 PM		3		
1009	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:58:26 AM		3		
1010	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:58:26 AM		3		
1011	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:51:10 PM		3		
1012	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:51:10 PM		4		
1013	NKA	'No measures of density of LWD in this reach. Assumed less wood than template, more than Muddy and Pine.'	9/18/2002 2:41:00 PM		3		
1014	NKA	'No measures of density of LWD in this reach. Assumed less wood than template, more than Muddy and Pine.'	9/18/2002 2:41:00 PM		4		
1015	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 2:50:27 PM		1		
1016	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 2:50:27 PM		3		
1017	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 2:50:21 PM		1		
1018	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 2:50:21 PM		3		
1019	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1020	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1021	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1022	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1023	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1024	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1025	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1026	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1027	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1028	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1029	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1030	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1031	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1032	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1033	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1034	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1035	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1036	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1037	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1038	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1039	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1040	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1041	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1042	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1043	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		1		
1044	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1045	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1046	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1047	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1048	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1049	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1050	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1051	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1052	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1053	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1054	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1055	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1056	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1057	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1058	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1059	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1060	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1061	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1062	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1063	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1064	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1065	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1066	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1067	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1068	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1069	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1070	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1071	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1072	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1073	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1074	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1075	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1076	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1077	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1078	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1079	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1080	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1081	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1082	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1083	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1084	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1085	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1086	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1087	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1088	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1089	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1090	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1091	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1092	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		3		
1093		''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		1		
1094		''	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1095	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1096	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1097	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		2		
1098	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:38 AM		4		
1099	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Slide Creek Comments for reach are: USFS Data'	5/30/2001 4:55:03 PM		4		
1100	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Slide Creek Comments for reach are: USFS Data'	5/30/2001 4:55:03 PM		4		
1101		''	9/23/2002 11:08:43 AM		4		
1102		''	9/23/2002 11:08:43 AM		4		
1103		''	9/23/2002 11:10:52 AM		4		
1104		''	9/23/2002 11:10:52 AM		4		
1105		''	9/23/2002 11:08:49 AM		4		
1106		''	9/23/2002 11:08:49 AM		4		
1107		''	9/23/2002 11:10:43 AM		2		
1108		''	9/23/2002 11:10:43 AM		3		
1109		''	9/23/2002 11:08:37 AM		4		
1110		''	9/23/2002 11:08:37 AM		4		
1111		''	9/23/2002 11:11:05 AM		3		
1112		''	9/23/2002 11:11:05 AM		4		
1113		''	9/23/2002 11:11:15 AM		4		
1114		''	9/23/2002 11:11:15 AM		4		
1115		''	9/23/2002 11:10:58 AM		4		
1116		''	9/23/2002 11:10:58 AM		4		
1117		''	9/23/2002 11:08:53 AM		4		
1118		''	9/23/2002 11:08:53 AM		4		
1119		''	9/23/2002 11:09:24 AM		2		
1120		''	9/23/2002 11:09:24 AM		2		
1121		''	9/23/2002 11:10:47 AM		2		
1122		''	9/23/2002 11:10:47 AM		3		
1123		''	9/23/2002 11:09:29 AM		3		
1124		''	9/23/2002 11:09:29 AM		4		
1125		''	9/23/2002 11:09:19 AM		2		
1126		''	9/23/2002 11:09:19 AM		2		
1127		''	9/23/2002 11:10:30 AM		2		
1128		''	9/23/2002 11:10:30 AM		4		
1129		''	9/23/2002 11:10:11 AM		2		
1130		''	9/23/2002 11:10:11 AM		4		
1131		''	9/23/2002 11:10:20 AM		2		
1132		''	9/23/2002 11:10:20 AM		4		
1133		''	9/23/2002 11:10:26 AM		2		
1134		''	9/23/2002 11:10:26 AM		4		
1135		''	9/23/2002 11:10:15 AM		2		
1136		''	9/23/2002 11:10:15 AM		4		
1137		''	9/23/2002 11:11:25 AM		3		
1138		''	9/23/2002 11:11:25 AM		3		
1139		''	9/23/2002 11:10:06 AM		3		
1140		''	9/23/2002 11:10:06 AM		3		
1141		''	9/23/2002 11:08:26 AM		4		
1142		''	9/23/2002 11:08:26 AM		4		
1143		''	9/23/2002 11:08:30 AM		4		
1144		''	9/23/2002 11:08:30 AM		4		
1145		''	9/23/2002 11:08:21 AM		4		
1146		''	9/23/2002 11:08:21 AM		4		
1147		''	9/23/2002 11:08:59 AM		4		
1148		''	9/23/2002 11:08:59 AM		4		
1149		''	9/23/2002 11:09:04 AM		4		
1150		''	9/23/2002 11:09:04 AM		4		
1151		''	9/23/2002 11:09:15 AM		4		
1152		''	9/23/2002 11:09:15 AM		4		
1153		''	9/23/2002 11:09:50 AM		2		
1154		''	9/23/2002 11:09:50 AM		4		
1155		''	9/23/2002 11:09:59 AM		4		
1156		''	9/23/2002 11:09:59 AM		4		
1157		''	9/23/2002 11:08:16 AM		4		
1158		''	9/23/2002 11:08:16 AM		4		
1159		''	9/23/2002 11:09:10 AM		2		
1160		''	9/23/2002 11:09:10 AM		4		
1161		''	9/23/2002 11:09:45 AM		2		
1162		''	9/23/2002 11:09:45 AM		4		
1163		''	9/23/2002 11:09:41 AM		2		
1164		''	9/23/2002 11:09:41 AM		4		
1165	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1166	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1167	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1168	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1169	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1170	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1171	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map classifies Copper Cr. as a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:04:42 AM		2		
1172	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC GIS map classifies Copper Cr. as a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:04:42 AM		3		
1173	NKA	'Map shows a road crossing, and a road following the stream near the headwaters.'	9/20/2002 10:02:17 AM		2		
1174	NKA	'Map shows a road crossing, and a road following the stream near the headwaters.'	9/20/2002 10:02:17 AM		2		
1175	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1176	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1177	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:46:18 AM		4		
1178	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:46:18 AM		4		
1179	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:46:08 AM		3		
1180	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:46:08 AM		3		
1181	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1182	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1183	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1184	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		2		
1185	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		1		
1186	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1187	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1188	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		2		
1189	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:30 AM		3		
1190	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:30 AM		4		
1191	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:36 AM		3		
1192	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:36 AM		4		
1193	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:24 AM		3		
1194	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:24 AM		4		
1195	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:04 AM		3		
1196	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:04 AM		4		
1197	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:08:50 AM		4		
1198	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3%, Rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:08:50 AM		4		
1199	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:14 AM		3		
1200	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:14 AM		4		
1201	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:19 AM		3		
1202	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:19 AM		4		
1203	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:08 AM		3		
1204	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:57:08 AM		4		
1205	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1206	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1207	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1208	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1209	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1210	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1211	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1212	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1213	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1214	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1215	NKA	''	9/20/2002 9:54:15 AM		4		
1216	NKA	''	9/20/2002 9:54:15 AM		4		
1217	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1218	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		2		
1219	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:35:19 AM		3		
1220	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 8:35:19 AM		3		
1221	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1222	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1223	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1224	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1225	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1226	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1227	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1228	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		3		
1229	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1230	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
1231	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS Copper Creek stream survey report documents 219 pieces/mile (Largest size class LWD) in Copper Cr. in the lower 1.4 miles.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:59:56 AM		4		
1232	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS Copper Creek stream survey report documents 219 pieces/mile (Largest size class LWD) in Copper Cr. in the lower 1.4 miles.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:59:56 AM		4		
1233	NKA	'USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 10:00:29 AM		1		
1234	NKA	'USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 10:00:29 AM		3		
1235	NKA	' USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 10:00:24 AM		1		
1236	NKA	' USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 10:00:24 AM		3		
1237	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:33 PM		3		
1238	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:33 PM		3		
1239	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:29:35 PM		4		
1240	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:29:35 PM		4		
1241	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:39:39 AM		1		
1242	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:39:39 AM		2		
1243	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:26:09 AM		2		
1244	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:26:09 AM		3		
1245	NKA	'No mention of such problems in USFS report'	8/23/2002 4:49:07 PM		2		
1246	NKA	'No mention of such problems in USFS report'	8/23/2002 4:49:07 PM		2		
1247	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:13:09 PM		3		
1248	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:13:09 PM		3		
1249	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:22:12 PM		3		
1250	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:22:12 PM		3		
1251	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road densities from upper and lower basin were averaged.'	9/17/2002 4:03:40 PM		3		
1252	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road densities from upper and lower basin were averaged.'	9/17/2002 4:03:40 PM		3		
1253	WG	'10 spp: Rainbow, Bull, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:13:53 AM		3		
1254	WG	'10 spp: Rainbow, Bull, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:13:53 AM		3		
1255	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:35:57 PM		3		
1256	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:35:57 PM		2		
1257	NKA	'None mentioned in USFS report'	8/23/2002 4:53:37 PM		2		
1258	NKA	'None mentioned in USFS report'	8/23/2002 4:53:37 PM		2		
1259		'USFS reports avg gradient of 3%'	8/26/2002 9:47:36 AM		1		
1260		'USFS reports avg gradient of 3%'	8/26/2002 9:47:36 AM		2		
1261	WG	'Campground and road access'	9/16/2002 1:21:27 PM		2		
1262	WG	'Campground and road access'	9/16/2002 1:21:27 PM		2		
1263	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:59:44 PM		3		
1264	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:59:44 PM		2		
1265	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:17 PM		3		
1266	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:17 PM		4		
1267	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:20 PM		3		
1268	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:20 PM		4		
1269	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:13 PM		3		
1270	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:13 PM		4		
1271	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:52 PM		3		
1272	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:52 PM		4		
1273	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:07:01 AM		4		
1274	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:07:01 AM		4		
1275	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:02 PM		3		
1276	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:02 PM		4		
1277	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:09 PM		3		
1278	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:15:09 PM		4		
1279	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:58 PM		3		
1280	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:58 PM		4		
1281	Nick Ackerman	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:57:19 AM		3		
1282	Nick Ackerman	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:57:19 AM		3		
1283	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/23/2002 4:30:55 PM		2		
1284	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/23/2002 4:30:55 PM		2		
1285	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:23 PM		3		
1286	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:23 PM		3		
1287	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:28 PM		3		
1288	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:28 PM		3		
1289	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:19 PM		3		
1290	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:19 PM		3		
1291	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:25:23 AM		3		
1292	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:25:23 AM		2		
1293	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:17:43 AM		3		
1294	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:17:43 AM		3		
1295	WG	'Kokanee spawning'	9/24/2002 10:55:25 AM		3		
1296	WG	'Kokanee spawning'	9/24/2002 10:55:25 AM		3		
1297	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/11/94 and 1/4/95.  Min daily temp for the period was 5.7 on 1/4/95.  Spring fed stream with little temporal temperature variation.  I assumed the temps never dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 10:07:44 AM		2		
1298	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/11/94 and 1/4/95.  Min daily temp for the period was 5.7 on 1/4/95.  Spring fed stream with little temporal temperature variation.  I assumed the temps never dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 10:07:44 AM		3		
1299	NKA	'Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study reports temperatures taken from 8/11/94-1/4/95.  Max temp of 8.8 was achieved twice in August.'	9/17/2002 9:18:41 AM		2		
1300	NKA	'Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study reports temperatures taken from 8/11/94-1/4/95.  Max temp of 8.8 was achieved twice in August.'	9/17/2002 9:18:41 AM		3		
1301	NKA	'USFS stream survey report indicates that the stream is spring fed, but may not have significant spring inputs within this reach.'	9/17/2002 7:59:44 AM		2		
1302	NKA	'USFS stream survey report indicates that the stream is spring fed, but may not have significant spring inputs within this reach.'	9/17/2002 7:59:44 AM		2		
1303	WG	'Partially spring fed, no mention of problems with turbidity in USFS stream survey report, and observations by proffessionals indicate stream stays clear year round.'	9/16/2002 3:59:45 PM		3		
1304	WG	'Partially spring fed, no mention of problems with turbidity in USFS stream survey report, and observations by proffessionals indicate stream stays clear year round.'	9/16/2002 3:59:45 PM		3		
1305	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents that LWD is abundant in Cougar Creek.'	9/17/2002 12:54:25 PM		4		
1306	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents that LWD is abundant in Cougar Creek.'	9/17/2002 12:54:25 PM		3		
1307	NKA	'USFS Cougar Creek stream survey'	8/23/2002 4:24:27 PM		1		
1308	NKA	'USFS Cougar Creek stream survey'	8/23/2002 4:24:27 PM		3		
1309	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.  Average Bankfull width.'	8/23/2002 4:22:42 PM		1		
1310	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.  Average Bankfull width.'	8/23/2002 4:22:42 PM		3		
1311	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1312	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1313	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1314	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1315	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1316	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1317	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1318	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1319	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1320	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1321	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1322	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1323	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1324	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1325	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1326	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1327	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1328	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1329	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1330	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1331	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1332	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1333	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1334	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1335	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		1		
1336	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1337	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1338	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1339	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1340	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1341	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1342	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1343	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1344	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1345	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1346	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1347	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1348	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1349	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1350	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1351	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1352	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1353	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1354	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1355	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1356	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1357	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1358	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1359	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1360	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1361	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1362	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1363	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1364	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1365	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1366	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1367	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1368	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1369	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1370	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1371	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1372	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1373	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1374	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1375	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1376	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1377	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1378	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1379	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1380	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1381	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1382	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1383	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1384	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		3		
1385		''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		1		
1386		''	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1387	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1388	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1389	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		2		
1390	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:00 AM		4		
1391	nka	'Assumed same as Drift, Swift, and Pine'	9/2/2002 9:47:41 AM		3		
1392	nka	'Assumed same as Drift, Swift, and Pine'	9/2/2002 9:47:41 AM		3		
1393	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:29:55 PM		4		
1394	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:29:55 PM		4		
1395	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:40:02 AM		3		
1396	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:40:02 AM		3		
1397	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Crab Cr. as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/24/2002 10:09:47 AM		3		
1398	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Crab Cr. as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/24/2002 10:09:47 AM		3		
1399	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:04:32 PM		3		
1400	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:04:32 PM		3		
1401	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:19:06 PM		3		
1402	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:19:06 PM		3		
1403	NKA	'SMALL STREAM LIKELY TO BE IMPACTED BY WINTER FRESHETS'	8/29/2002 2:17:30 PM		3		
1404	NKA	'SMALL STREAM LIKELY TO BE IMPACTED BY WINTER FRESHETS'	8/29/2002 2:17:30 PM		4		
1405	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:55:43 PM		3		
1406	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:55:43 PM		3		
1407	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:14:27 AM		2		
1408	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:14:27 AM		2		
1409	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:36:35 PM		3		
1410	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:36:35 PM		2		
1411	NKA	'USFS Stream survey summary report (Kinney and Lampo 2002).'	9/18/2002 7:47:21 AM		2		
1412	NKA	'USFS Stream survey summary report (Kinney and Lampo 2002).'	9/18/2002 7:47:21 AM		3		
1413	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:59:57 PM		3		
1414	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:59:57 PM		2		
1415		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:46 PM		4		
1416		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:46 PM		4		
1417		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:50 PM		4		
1418		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:50 PM		4		
1419	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:42 PM		4		
1420	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:42 PM		4		
1421	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:26 PM		4		
1422	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:26 PM		4		
1423	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:09:32 AM		4		
1424	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:09:32 AM		4		
1425	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:32 PM		4		
1426	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:32 PM		4		
1427	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:38 PM		4		
1428	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:38 PM		4		
1429	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:29 PM		4		
1430	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:48:29 PM		4		
1431	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional'	9/20/2002 7:59:25 AM		3		
1432	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional'	9/20/2002 7:59:25 AM		3		
1433	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/29/2002 2:16:06 PM		3		
1434	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/29/2002 2:16:06 PM		3		
1435	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:54 PM		3		
1436	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:54 PM		3		
1437	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:58 PM		3		
1438	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:58 PM		3		
1439	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:50 PM		3		
1440	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:45:50 PM		3		
1441	NKA	'In 1989 USFS surveyed lower 0.39 miles and found barrier.  Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/19/2002 6:59:26 PM		4		
1442	NKA	'In 1989 USFS surveyed lower 0.39 miles and found barrier.  Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/19/2002 6:59:26 PM		4		
1443	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:25:58 AM		2		
1444	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:25:58 AM		2		
1445	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:19:11 AM		3		
1446	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:19:11 AM		3		
1447	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:13:03 AM		2		
1448	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:13:03 AM		3		
1449	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:27:18 PM		4		
1450	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:27:18 PM		4		
1451	NKA	'USFS data from Crab Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 8 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 17.8 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS).  Data was only measured 8 days, so I assumed there would have been at least 12 days of 16 degrees temps or greater.'	9/17/2002 5:16:22 PM		3		
1452	NKA	'USFS data from Crab Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 8 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 17.8 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS).  Data was only measured 8 days, so I assumed there would have been at least 12 days of 16 degrees temps or greater.'	9/17/2002 5:16:22 PM		3		
1453	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:00:06 AM		3		
1454	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:00:06 AM		3		
1455	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 8:47:13 AM		3		
1456	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 8:47:13 AM		4		
1457	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 30 pieces/mile in Crab Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:09:12 PM		3		
1458	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 30 pieces/mile in Crab Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:09:12 PM		3		
1459	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 5:04:07 PM		1		
1460	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 5:04:07 PM		4		
1461	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:51:58 PM		3		
1462	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:51:58 PM		4		
1463	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1464	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1465	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1466	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1467	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1468	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1469	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map classifies Curly Creek as a Rosgen type A channel.'	9/20/2002 9:37:44 AM		3		
1470	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map classifies Curly Creek as a Rosgen type A channel.'	9/20/2002 9:37:44 AM		3		
1471	NKA	'No road influences below barrier'	9/20/2002 9:38:26 AM		2		
1472	NKA	'No road influences below barrier'	9/20/2002 9:38:26 AM		2		
1473	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels. Big Creek D.O. levels ranged from 9.9-13.5.   (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1474	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels. Big Creek D.O. levels ranged from 9.9-13.5.   (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1475	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:25:35 AM		3		
1476	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 9:25:35 AM		3		
1477	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:25:28 AM		3		
1478	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 9:25:28 AM		3		
1479	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1480	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1481	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1482	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1483	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002'	9/20/2002 9:39:44 AM		1		
1484	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002'	9/20/2002 9:39:44 AM		3		
1485	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1486	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1487	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:19 AM		3		
1488	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:19 AM		4		
1489	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:24 AM		3		
1490	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:24 AM		4		
1491	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:14 AM		3		
1492	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:14 AM		4		
1493	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:28:51 AM		3		
1494	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:28:51 AM		4		
1495	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:10:06 AM		4		
1496	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:10:06 AM		4		
1497	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:02 AM		3		
1498	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:02 AM		4		
1499	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:09 AM		3		
1500	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:29:09 AM		4		
1501	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:28:57 AM		3		
1502	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 9:28:57 AM		4		
1503	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1504	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1505	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1506	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1507	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1508	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1509	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1510	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1511	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1512	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1513	NKA	'Pacific Corp barrier map shows a barrier at the mouth of the creek.'	9/20/2002 9:36:22 AM		1		
1514	NKA	'Pacific Corp barrier map shows a barrier at the mouth of the creek.'	9/20/2002 9:36:22 AM		2		
1515	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1516	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1517	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1518	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1519	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		2		
1520	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1521	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents a minimum temperature in Big Creek of 3.3 degrees on 10/31.  Temps were not monitored through the winter.  That was the last day of sampling.  Assumed temps dropped to at least 2.0 degrees in Dec or Jan.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1522	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents a minimum temperature in Big Creek of 3.3 degrees on 10/31.  Temps were not monitored through the winter.  That was the last day of sampling.  Assumed temps dropped to at least 2.0 degrees in Dec or Jan.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1523	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report documents that from 8/9/94-10/31/94 a max temp of 14 was recorded on 8/11-8/13.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1524	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report documents that from 8/9/94-10/31/94 a max temp of 14 was recorded on 8/11-8/13.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		4		
1525	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1526	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1527	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:42 AM		3		
1528	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:42 AM		4		
1529	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 80 pieces/mile in Curly Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:26:35 AM		2		
1530	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 80 pieces/mile in Curly Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 9:26:35 AM		4		
1531	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		1		
1532	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Big Creek Mid Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp Report'	9/20/2002 9:23:43 AM		3		
1533	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/26/2002 9:42:54 AM		3		
1534	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/26/2002 9:42:54 AM		3		
1535	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:54 PM		2		
1536	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:16:54 PM		4		
1537	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:14 PM		4		
1538	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:14 PM		4		
1539	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:40:27 AM		3		
1540	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:40:27 AM		3		
1541	NKA	'USFS stream survey reports valley width is 1-2X channel width.'	9/17/2002 7:32:22 AM		3		
1542	NKA	'USFS stream survey reports valley width is 1-2X channel width.'	9/17/2002 7:32:22 AM		3		
1543	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:04:43 PM		3		
1544	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:04:43 PM		4		
1545	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:17:42 PM		4		
1546	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:17:42 PM		4		
1547		''	11/22/2002 10:00:07 AM		3		
1548		''	11/22/2002 10:00:07 AM		4		
1549	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/26/2002 9:02:17 AM		3		
1550	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/26/2002 9:02:17 AM		3		
1551	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:14:56 AM		2		
1552	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:14:56 AM		2		
1553	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:36:53 PM		3		
1554	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:36:53 PM		2		
1555	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:31:59 PM		1		
1556	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:31:59 PM		3		
1557	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:00:09 PM		3		
1558	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:00:09 PM		2		
1559	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:42:00 PM		3		
1560	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:42:00 PM		4		
1561	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:42:04 PM		3		
1562	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:42:04 PM		4		
1563	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:57 PM		3		
1564	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:57 PM		4		
1565	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:32 PM		3		
1566	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:32 PM		4		
1567	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:11:07 AM		4		
1568	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:11:07 AM		4		
1569	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:50 PM		3		
1570	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:50 PM		4		
1571	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:53 PM		3		
1572	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:53 PM		4		
1573	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:35 PM		3		
1574	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:41:35 PM		4		
1575	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional. Kevin Malone Changed to Snowmelt based on gage data in 2000 Technical Study reports'	11/22/2002 9:58:02 AM		3		
1576	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional. Kevin Malone Changed to Snowmelt based on gage data in 2000 Technical Study reports'	11/22/2002 9:58:02 AM		3		
1577	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/27/2002 11:43:54 AM		3		
1578	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	8/27/2002 11:43:54 AM		3		
1579	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:19 PM		3		
1580	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:19 PM		3		
1581	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:23 PM		3		
1582	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:23 PM		3		
1583	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:14 PM		3		
1584	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:46:14 PM		3		
1585	NKA	'20 ft falls at RM 0.25 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/2/2002 9:46:28 AM		1		
1586	NKA	'20 ft falls at RM 0.25 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/2/2002 9:46:28 AM		2		
1587	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:26:26 AM		2		
1588	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:26:26 AM		2		
1589	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/17/2002 10:21:58 AM		2		
1590	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/17/2002 10:21:58 AM		2		
1591	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:13:37 AM		2		
1592	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:13:37 AM		3		
1593	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:26:56 PM		4		
1594	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:26:56 PM		4		
1595	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:07:28 PM		4		
1596	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:07:28 PM		4		
1597	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:00:26 AM		3		
1598	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:00:26 AM		3		
1599	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:51 AM		3		
1600	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:22:51 AM		4		
1601	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:10:28 PM		2		
1602	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:10:28 PM		4		
1603	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:50:47 PM		1		
1604	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:50:47 PM		3		
1605	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:50:50 PM		1		
1606	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 4:50:50 PM		3		
1607	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 9:45:49 AM		4		
1608	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 9:45:49 AM		4		
1609	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1610	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1611	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1612	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1613	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1614	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1615	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Diamond as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:28:45 PM		2		
1616	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Diamond as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:28:45 PM		2		
1617	NKA	'No roads in lower 0.1 miles'	9/20/2002 12:29:31 PM		2		
1618	NKA	'No roads in lower 0.1 miles'	9/20/2002 12:29:31 PM		2		
1619	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1620	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1621	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1622	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1623	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1624	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1625	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1626	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1627	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1628	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1629	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1630	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1631		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:28:07 PM		1		
1632		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:28:07 PM		2		
1633	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1634	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1635	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1636	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1637	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1638	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1639	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1640	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1641	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1642	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1643	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:11:33 AM		4		
1644	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:11:33 AM		4		
1645	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1646	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1647	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1648	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1649	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1650	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1651	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1652	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1653	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1654	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1655	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1656	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1657	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1658	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1659	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1660	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1661	NKA	'No barriers documented by Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:30:05 PM		1		
1662	NKA	'No barriers documented by Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:30:05 PM		2		
1663	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1664	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		2		
1665	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1666	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1667	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:51 AM		3		
1668	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:59:51 AM		3		
1669	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1670	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1671	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1672	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1673	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1674	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1675	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1676	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		3		
1677	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1678	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:35:23 AM		4		
1679	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:27:05 PM		1		
1680	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:27:05 PM		4		
1681	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:27:02 PM		1		
1682	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:27:02 PM		4		
1683	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1684	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1685	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1686	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1687	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1688	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1689	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1690	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1691	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1692	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1693	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1694	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1695	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:25:09 AM		3		
1696	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:25:09 AM		3		
1697	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1698	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1699	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:24:57 AM		3		
1700	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:24:57 AM		4		
1701	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1702	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1703	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1704	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1705	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1706	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1707	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		1		
1708	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1709	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1710	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1711	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1712	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1713	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1714	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1715	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1716	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1717	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1718	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1719	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1720	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1721	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1722	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1723	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1724	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1725	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1726	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1727	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1728	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1729	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1730	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1731	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1732	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1733	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1734	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1735	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1736	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1737	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1738	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1739	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1740	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1741	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1742	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1743	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1744	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1745	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1746	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1747	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1748	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1749	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1750	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1751	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1752	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1753	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1754	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1755	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1756	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		3		
1757		''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		1		
1758		''	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1759	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		2		
1760	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:11 AM		4		
1761	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:09:43 AM		2		
1762	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:09:43 AM		4		
1763	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1764	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1765	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1766	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1767	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1768	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1769	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1770	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1771	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1772	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1773	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1774	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1775	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1776	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1777	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1778	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1779	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1780	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1781	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1782	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1783	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1784	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1785	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1786	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1787	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		1		
1788	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1789	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1790	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1791	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1792	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1793	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1794	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1795	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1796	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1797	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1798	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1799	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1800	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1801	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1802	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1803	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1804	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1805	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1806	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1807	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1808	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1809	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1810	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1811	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1812	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1813	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1814	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1815	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1816	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1817	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1818	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1819	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1820	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1821	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1822	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1823	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1824	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1825	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1826	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1827	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1828	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1829	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1830	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1831	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1832	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1833	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1834	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1835	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1836	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		3		
1837		''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		1		
1838		''	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1839	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		2		
1840	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:51 AM		4		
1841	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 8:10:49 AM		2		
1842	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 8:10:49 AM		4		
1843	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1844	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1845	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1846	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1847	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1848	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1849	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1850	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1851	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1852	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1853	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1854	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1855	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribschanged to account for reservoir inundation'	2/11/2003 9:09:38 AM		3		
1856	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribschanged to account for reservoir inundation'	2/11/2003 9:09:38 AM		3		
1857	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1858	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1859	km	'changed to account for reservoir inundation'	2/11/2003 9:09:29 AM		3		
1860	km	'changed to account for reservoir inundation'	2/11/2003 9:09:29 AM		4		
1861	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1862	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1863	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1864	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1865	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1866	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1867	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		1		
1868	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1869	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1870	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1871	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1872	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1873	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1874	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1875	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1876	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1877	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1878	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1879	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1880	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1881	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1882	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1883	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1884	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1885	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1886	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1887	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		4		
1888	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1889	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1890	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1891	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1892	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1893	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1894	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1895	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1896	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1897	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1898	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1899	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1900	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1901	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1902	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1903	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1904	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1905	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1906	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1907	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1908	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1909	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1910	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1911	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1912	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1913	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1914	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1915	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		3		
1916		''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		1		
1917		''	2/11/2003 7:51:44 AM		2		
1918	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report. Changed widths based on upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:06:06 AM		2		
1919	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report. Changed widths based on upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:06:06 AM		4		
1920	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Changed widths based on upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:05:50 AM		2		
1921	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Changed widths based on upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:05:50 AM		4		
1922	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 15-32.'	9/16/2002 3:20:36 PM		3		
1923	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 15-32.'	9/16/2002 3:20:36 PM		3		
1924	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:39 PM		4		
1925	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:39 PM		4		
1926	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:41:09 AM		3		
1927	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:41:09 AM		3		
1928	NKA	'USFS stream survey report called the Reach Rosgen channel type A/B'	9/17/2002 7:33:43 AM		1		
1929	NKA	'USFS stream survey report called the Reach Rosgen channel type A/B'	9/17/2002 7:33:43 AM		2		
1930	NKA	'Gazeteer shows very little influence from roads in this reach'	9/25/2002 1:23:06 PM		2		
1931	NKA	'Gazeteer shows very little influence from roads in this reach'	9/25/2002 1:23:06 PM		2		
1932	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.5 mg/L'	8/26/2002 2:05:37 PM		3		
1933	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.5 mg/L'	8/26/2002 2:05:37 PM		3		
1934	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:21:02 PM		3		
1935	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:21:02 PM		3		
1936	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:58:14 PM		3		
1937	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:58:14 PM		3		
1938	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.Patient:  add brook trout according to USFS Drift Cr. stream survey report.'	9/25/2002 1:31:52 PM		3		
1939	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.Patient:  add brook trout according to USFS Drift Cr. stream survey report.'	9/25/2002 1:31:52 PM		2		
1940	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:37:42 PM		2		
1941	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:37:42 PM		2		
1942	WG	'Brook trout- USFS stream survey report.'	9/16/2002 4:13:58 PM		3		
1943	WG	'Brook trout- USFS stream survey report.'	9/16/2002 4:13:58 PM		2		
1944	NKA	'Drift Creek stream survey report and Pacific Corp FERC report.  Survey only covered lower 1.6 miles of stream'	9/17/2002 2:11:32 PM		2		
1945	NKA	'Drift Creek stream survey report and Pacific Corp FERC report.  Survey only covered lower 1.6 miles of stream'	9/17/2002 2:11:32 PM		3		
1946	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:06:40 PM		2		
1947	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:06:40 PM		2		
1948	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:45 PM		3		
1949	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:45 PM		3		
1950	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:50 PM		3		
1951	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:50 PM		3		
1952	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:40 PM		3		
1953	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:40 PM		3		
1954	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:21 PM		2		
1955	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:21 PM		3		
1956	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:13:31 AM		4		
1957	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:13:31 AM		4		
1958	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:31 PM		2		
1959	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:31 PM		3		
1960	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:36 PM		3		
1961	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:36 PM		3		
1962	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:27 PM		2		
1963	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:09:27 PM		3		
1964	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/20/2002 8:03:22 AM		3		
1965	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/20/2002 8:03:22 AM		3		
1966	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 1:35:20 PM		3		
1967	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 1:35:20 PM		3		
1968	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:13 PM		3		
1969	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:13 PM		3		
1970	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:17 PM		3		
1971	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:17 PM		3		
1972	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:08 PM		3		
1973	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:08 PM		3		
1974	NKA	'10 ft falls 8,506 ft upstream (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:43:34 PM		1		
1975	NKA	'10 ft falls 8,506 ft upstream (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:43:34 PM		2		
1976	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:27:13 AM		2		
1977	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:27:13 AM		2		
1978	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:19:56 AM		3		
1979	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:19:56 AM		3		
1980	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/25/2002 9:09:52 AM		2		
1981	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/25/2002 9:09:52 AM		3		
1982	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 10/20/99, and after 5/18/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 6.2 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 9:32:23 AM		3		
1983	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 10/20/99, and after 5/18/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 6.2 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 9:32:23 AM		4		
1984	WG	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents three temperature readings at the mouth of 16 deg or greater with a max of 16.3.  Max reading was in August.'	9/17/2002 8:34:36 AM		1		
1985	WG	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents three temperature readings at the mouth of 16 deg or greater with a max of 16.3.  Max reading was in August.'	9/17/2002 8:34:36 AM		3		
1986	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:01:29 AM		3		
1987	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:01:29 AM		3		
1988	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:57:23 PM		3		
1989	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:57:23 PM		3		
1990	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 12 pieces/mile in Drift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:11:33 PM		3		
1991	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 12 pieces/mile in Drift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:11:33 PM		3		
1992	NKA	'USFS Range Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 1:38:53 PM		1		
1993	NKA	'USFS Range Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 1:38:53 PM		4		
1994	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.'	8/26/2002 1:38:45 PM		1		
1995	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.'	8/26/2002 1:38:45 PM		4		
1996	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
1997	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
1998	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
1999	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2000	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2001	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2002	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2003	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2004	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2005	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2006	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2007	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2008	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2009	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2010	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2011	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2012	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2013	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2014	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2015	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2016	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2017	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2018	NKA	''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2019	NKA	''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2020	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		1		
2021	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2022	WG	''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2023	WG	''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2024	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2025	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2026	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2027	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2028	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2029	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2030	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2031	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2032	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2033	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2034	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2035	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2036	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2037	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2038	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2039	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2040	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2041	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2042	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Similar for other Merwin tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2043	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Similar for other Merwin tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2044	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2045	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2046	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2047	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2048	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2049	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2050	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2051	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2052	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2053	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2054	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2055	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2056	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2057	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2058	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2059	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2060	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2061	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2062	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2063	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2064	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2065	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2066	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2067	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2068	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2069	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		3		
2070		''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		1		
2071		''	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2072	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		2		
2073	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 9:19:49 AM		4		
2074	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Changed widths to reflect upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:22:36 AM		2		
2075	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Changed widths to reflect upstream reach.'	2/11/2003 9:22:36 AM		4		
2076		''	4/16/2002 11:58:47 AM		2		
2077		''	4/16/2002 11:58:47 AM		3		
2078	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2079	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2080	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2081	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2082	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2083	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2084	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:23:43 PM		3		
2085	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:23:43 PM		3		
2086	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2087	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2088	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 12:49:52 PM		3		
2089	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 12:49:52 PM		3		
2090	WG	'Assumed the same as Dog Cr.'	9/25/2002 12:49:44 PM		3		
2091	WG	'Assumed the same as Dog Cr.'	9/25/2002 12:49:44 PM		3		
2092	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2093	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2094	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		2		
2095	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		2		
2096	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		1		
2097	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2098	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		2		
2099	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		2		
2100	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2101	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2102	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2103	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2104	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2105	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2106	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2107	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2108	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:13:49 AM		4		
2109	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:13:49 AM		4		
2110	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2111	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2112	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2113	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2114	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2115	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2116	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:55 AM		3		
2117	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:55 AM		3		
2118	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2119	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2120	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2121	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2122	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2123	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2124	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2125	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2126	NKA	'15.4 ft falls at RM 0.9 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 12:23:19 PM		1		
2127	NKA	'15.4 ft falls at RM 0.9 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 12:23:19 PM		2		
2128	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2129	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2130	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:16:27 AM		4		
2131	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:16:27 AM		4		
2132	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:00:13 AM		2		
2133	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:00:13 AM		3		
2134	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2135	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2136	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2137	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2138	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2139	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		3		
2140	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:23:16 AM		3		
2141	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:23:16 AM		4		
2142	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2143	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:19 AM		4		
2144	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:25:13 PM		1		
2145	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:25:13 PM		3		
2146	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:25:03 PM		1		
2147	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:25:03 PM		3		
2148	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2149	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2150	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2151	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2152	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2153	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2154	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen B'	9/20/2002 10:47:50 AM		1		
2155	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen B'	9/20/2002 10:47:50 AM		2		
2156	NKA	'Map indicates no roads in the lower 0.6 miles'	9/20/2002 10:49:07 AM		2		
2157	NKA	'Map indicates no roads in the lower 0.6 miles'	9/20/2002 10:49:07 AM		2		
2158	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2159	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2160	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2161	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2162	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2163	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2164	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2165	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2166	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2167	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2168	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		1		
2169	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2170	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2171	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2172	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2173	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2174	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2175	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2176	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2177	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2178	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2179	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2180	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:15:10 AM		4		
2181	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:15:10 AM		4		
2182	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2183	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2184	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2185	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2186	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2187	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2188	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:22 AM		3		
2189	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:42:22 AM		3		
2190	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2191	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2192	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2193	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2194	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2195	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2196	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2197	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2198	NKA	'25 ft falls at RM 0.6 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 10:51:48 AM		1		
2199	NKA	'25 ft falls at RM 0.6 (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 10:51:48 AM		2		
2200	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2201	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		2		
2202	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:19:11 AM		4		
2203	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:19:11 AM		4		
2204	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:00:22 AM		2		
2205	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:00:22 AM		3		
2206	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2207	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2208	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/25/2002 8:51:29 AM		4		
2209	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/25/2002 8:51:29 AM		4		
2210	WG	'Rosgen B channel has potential for limited groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:52:52 AM		3		
2211	WG	'Rosgen B channel has potential for limited groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 10:52:52 AM		3		
2212	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:23:26 AM		4		
2213	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:23:26 AM		4		
2214	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2215	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		4		
2216	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		1		
2217	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2218	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		1		
2219	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:20:32 AM		3		
2220	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:28:29 AM		4		
2221	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:28:29 AM		4		
2222	GWG	'Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/23/2001 11:35:53 AM		2		
2223	GWG	'Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/23/2001 11:35:53 AM		4		
2224	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Slide Creek Comments for reach are: USFS Data'	5/29/2001 4:16:55 PM		4		
2225	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Slide Creek Comments for reach are: USFS Data'	5/29/2001 4:16:55 PM		4		
2226	GWG	'Currently, this reach is confined by leeves.  In its pristine or natural state, it would be unconfined.'	5/31/2001 2:21:29 PM		2		
2227	GWG	'Currently, this reach is confined by leeves.  In its pristine or natural state, it would be unconfined.'	5/31/2001 2:21:29 PM		3		
2228	GB	'Database Test'	4/26/2001 9:13:01 AM		3		
2229	GB	'Database Test'	4/26/2001 9:13:01 AM		4		
2230	GWG	'Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 9:35:26 AM		1		
2231	GWG	'Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 9:35:26 AM		4		
2232	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:05:14 PM		1		
2233	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:05:14 PM		4		
2234	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:02 PM		1		
2235	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:02 PM		4		
2236	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:13 AM		3		
2237	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:13 AM		4		
2238	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:18:31 PM		2		
2239	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:18:31 PM		2		
2240	nka	'Reservoir had inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:21:23 AM		1		
2241	nka	'Reservoir had inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:21:23 AM		3		
2242	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:36 PM		1		
2243	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:36 PM		4		
2244	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:36 PM		3		
2245	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:36 PM		3		
2246	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:02:59 PM		3		
2247	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:02:59 PM		4		
2248		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:47 PM		1		
2249		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:47 PM		4		
2250		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:19 PM		2		
2251		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:19 PM		4		
2252	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:54 PM		1		
2253	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:54 PM		4		
2254	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:55 PM		3		
2255	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:55 PM		3		
2256	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:21:34 AM		1		
2257	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:21:34 AM		2		
2258	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:31 AM		1		
2259	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:31 AM		2		
2260	nka	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:04:20 PM		1		
2261	nka	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:04:20 PM		2		
2262	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7 & 12.'	9/18/2002 2:58:04 PM		2		
2263	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7 & 12.'	9/18/2002 2:58:04 PM		4		
2264	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:57 PM		1		
2265	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:57 PM		2		
2266	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:49:15 PM		1		
2267	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:49:15 PM		2		
2268	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:49 PM		1		
2269	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:49 PM		4		
2270	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:57 PM		1		
2271	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:57 PM		4		
2272	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:43 PM		1		
2273	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:43 PM		4		
2274	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:25 PM		1		
2275	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:25 PM		4		
2276	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches. Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:25:45 AM		4		
2277	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches. Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:25:45 AM		4		
2278	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:33 PM		1		
2279	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:33 PM		4		
2280	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:38 PM		1		
2281	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:38 PM		4		
2282	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:29 PM		1		
2283	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:03:29 PM		4		
2284	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:37:19 AM		1		
2285	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:37:19 AM		4		
2286	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:22 PM		2		
2287	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:22 PM		2		
2288	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:27 PM		2		
2289	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:27 PM		2		
2290	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:17 PM		2		
2291	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:17 PM		2		
2292	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:15:52 AM		2		
2293	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:15:52 AM		2		
2294	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:43 AM		3		
2295	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:43 AM		4		
2296	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:33 AM		1		
2297	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:33 AM		3		
2298	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:48:42 AM		2		
2299	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:48:42 AM		3		
2300	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:07:13 AM		2		
2301	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:07:13 AM		4		
2302	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:41 AM		3		
2303	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:41 AM		3		
2304	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:10:50 PM		1		
2305	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:10:50 PM		4		
2306	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:38 PM		2		
2307	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:38 PM		3		
2308	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:14 PM		3		
2309	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:14 PM		4		
2310	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:47 PM		3		
2311	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:47 PM		4		
2312	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:05:29 PM		1		
2313	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:05:29 PM		4		
2314	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:16 PM		1		
2315	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:16 PM		4		
2316	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:23 AM		3		
2317	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:23 AM		4		
2318	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:18:15 AM		2		
2319	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:18:15 AM		2		
2320	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:24:34 AM		1		
2321	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:24:34 AM		4		
2322	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:42 PM		1		
2323	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:42 PM		4		
2324	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:50 PM		3		
2325	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:50 PM		3		
2326	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:03:14 PM		3		
2327	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:03:14 PM		4		
2328	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:11 PM		1		
2329	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:11 PM		4		
2330		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:28 PM		4		
2331		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:28 PM		4		
2332	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:19 PM		1		
2333	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:19 PM		4		
2334	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:08 PM		3		
2335	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:08 PM		3		
2336	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:22:06 AM		1		
2337	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:22:06 AM		2		
2338	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:59 AM		1		
2339	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:59 AM		2		
2340	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:04:34 PM		1		
2341	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:04:34 PM		2		
2342	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7 & 12'	9/18/2002 2:58:32 PM		1		
2343	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7 & 12'	9/18/2002 2:58:32 PM		3		
2344	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:11:09 PM		1		
2345	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:11:09 PM		2		
2346	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/18/2002 2:46:14 PM		1		
2347	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/18/2002 2:46:14 PM		2		
2348	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:35 PM		1		
2349	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:35 PM		4		
2350	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:44 PM		4		
2351	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:44 PM		4		
2352	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:29 PM		1		
2353	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:29 PM		4		
2354	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:04 PM		1		
2355	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:04 PM		4		
2356	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:17:14 AM		4		
2357	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:17:14 AM		4		
2358	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:16 PM		1		
2359	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:16 PM		4		
2360	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:22 PM		1		
2361	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:22 PM		4		
2362	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:10 PM		1		
2363	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:05:10 PM		4		
2364	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:37:28 AM		4		
2365	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:46 PM		2		
2366	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:46 PM		2		
2367	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:50 PM		2		
2368	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:50 PM		2		
2369	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:42 PM		2		
2370	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:36:42 PM		2		
2371	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/18/2002 2:43:56 PM		2		
2372	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/18/2002 2:43:56 PM		2		
2373	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:51 AM		3		
2374	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:51 AM		4		
2375	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:48 AM		1		
2376	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:48 AM		3		
2377	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:49:10 AM		2		
2378	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/17/2002 9:49:10 AM		3		
2379	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/25/2002 8:49:11 AM		2		
2380	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 9.'	9/25/2002 8:49:11 AM		4		
2381	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:57 AM		3		
2382	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:57 AM		3		
2383	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:11:04 PM		1		
2384	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:11:04 PM		4		
2385	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:50 PM		2		
2386	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:50 PM		3		
2387	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:29 PM		3		
2388	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:29 PM		4		
2389	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:25 PM		3		
2390	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:19:25 PM		4		
2391	NKA	'Assumed approximately 25mg/L.  Range of values for bypas reach ranged from 14-30. (Pacific Corp FERC report).  Lestelle recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/18/2002 9:33:17 AM		3		
2392	NKA	'Assumed approximately 25mg/L.  Range of values for bypas reach ranged from 14-30. (Pacific Corp FERC report).  Lestelle recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/18/2002 9:33:17 AM		3		
2393	nka	'Assume that when there is spill or releases that scouring occurs'	9/19/2002 6:56:32 PM		3		
2394	nka	'Assume that when there is spill or releases that scouring occurs'	9/19/2002 6:56:32 PM		4		
2395	wg	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/18/2002 2:45:00 PM		3		
2396	wg	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/18/2002 2:45:00 PM		3		
2397	WG	'Rating suggested by Frank Shrier.'	9/19/2002 7:26:30 PM		2		
2398	WG	'Rating suggested by Frank Shrier.'	9/19/2002 7:26:30 PM		2		
2399	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/28/2002 11:34:40 AM		1		
2400	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/28/2002 11:34:40 AM		4		
2401	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports indicate that D.O. levels are consistently above 8mg/L in all sampled sites in the basin.'	9/18/2002 9:33:44 AM		2		
2402	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports indicate that D.O. levels are consistently above 8mg/L in all sampled sites in the basin.'	9/18/2002 9:33:44 AM		3		
2403	NKA	'Assumed embededness = % fines.'	9/18/2002 9:08:45 AM		2		
2404	NKA	'Assumed embededness = % fines.'	9/18/2002 9:08:45 AM		4		
2405		''	8/29/2002 1:03:38 PM		3		
2406		''	8/29/2002 1:03:38 PM		3		
2407	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:18 PM		3		
2408	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:18 PM		4		
2409	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:51 PM		4		
2410	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:51 PM		4		
2411	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:41 PM		3		
2412	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.  Swift bypass reach.  Much less water than historical conditions.'	8/28/2002 2:00:41 PM		4		
2413	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports 3% of sediments are smaller than 1mm in diameter in the Swift bypass reach.  Data from spawning gravel samples.'	9/25/2002 11:06:02 AM		2		
2414	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports 3% of sediments are smaller than 1mm in diameter in the Swift bypass reach.  Data from spawning gravel samples.'	9/25/2002 11:06:02 AM		4		
2415	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/18/2002 2:42:16 PM		2		
2416	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/18/2002 2:42:16 PM		3		
2417	nka	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/18/2002 2:47:25 PM		2		
2418	nka	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/18/2002 2:47:25 PM		3		
2419	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/18/2002 2:43:21 PM		2		
2420	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/18/2002 2:43:21 PM		3		
2421	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/18/2002 9:36:21 AM		1		
2422	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/18/2002 9:36:21 AM		2		
2423	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/18/2002 2:45:49 PM		3		
2424	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/18/2002 2:45:49 PM		3		
2425	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/18/2002 2:46:29 PM		2		
2426	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/18/2002 2:46:29 PM		4		
2427		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% glides'	8/28/2002 11:29:20 AM		3		
2428		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% glides'	8/28/2002 11:29:20 AM		3		
2429	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% riffles dominated by boulder and cobble substrate'	8/28/2002 11:28:13 AM		2		
2430	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% riffles dominated by boulder and cobble substrate'	8/28/2002 11:28:13 AM		3		
2431		'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area and George Gilmore habitat data  Low gradient streams less than 0.5% have significant off-channel side-channel habitat.'	11/25/2002 10:16:47 AM		4		
2432		'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area and George Gilmore habitat data  Low gradient streams less than 0.5% have significant off-channel side-channel habitat.'	11/25/2002 10:16:47 AM		4		
2433	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20% pools.  Assumed 3% was tailouts'	8/28/2002 11:28:56 AM		2		
2434	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20% pools.  Assumed 3% was tailouts'	8/28/2002 11:28:56 AM		3		
2435	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20% pools.  Assumed 3% was tailouts'	8/28/2002 11:29:05 AM		2		
2436	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20% pools.  Assumed 3% was tailouts'	8/28/2002 11:29:05 AM		3		
2437	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% riffles dominated by boulder and cobble substrate'	8/28/2002 11:28:24 AM		2		
2438	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 40% riffles dominated by boulder and cobble substrate'	8/28/2002 11:28:24 AM		3		
2439	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.'	8/28/2002 11:19:07 AM		3		
2440	NKA	'Information in Pacific Corps FERC reports lead to these ratings.'	8/28/2002 11:19:07 AM		4		
2441	NKA	'WESTERN CASCADE STREAM'	8/30/2002 12:48:14 PM		3		
2442	NKA	'WESTERN CASCADE STREAM'	8/30/2002 12:48:14 PM		3		
2443	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:24 AM		3		
2444	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:24 AM		3		
2445	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:28 AM		3		
2446	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:28 AM		3		
2447	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:20 AM		3		
2448	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/18/2002 9:34:20 AM		3		
2449	WG	'No hatchery or cattle grazing in the reach.  No other reasons to expect increased nutrient levels.'	9/18/2002 9:35:16 AM		3		
2450	WG	'No hatchery or cattle grazing in the reach.  No other reasons to expect increased nutrient levels.'	9/18/2002 9:35:16 AM		3		
2451	NKA	'Swift Dam at upstream end'	8/28/2002 11:36:06 AM		1		
2452	NKA	'Swift Dam at upstream end'	8/28/2002 11:36:06 AM		4		
2453	wg	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/18/2002 2:44:13 PM		3		
2454	wg	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/18/2002 2:44:13 PM		3		
2455	WG	''	9/19/2002 9:04:19 AM		2		
2456	WG	''	9/19/2002 9:04:19 AM		4		
2457	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC reports temperature data from 1/25/00-2/22/00.  Min daily temp of 3.5 was recorded on 1/30/00.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/19/2002 10:35:38 AM		1		
2458	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC reports temperature data from 1/25/00-2/22/00.  Min daily temp of 3.5 was recorded on 1/30/00.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/19/2002 10:35:38 AM		4		
2459	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports 31 days with max temps of 16 or greater.  Max temp was 18.2 recorded on 8/4/99.  Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 18. Temp monitor was in lower bypass reach.'	9/25/2002 8:49:24 AM		1		
2460	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports 31 days with max temps of 16 or greater.  Max temp was 18.2 recorded on 8/4/99.  Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 18. Temp monitor was in lower bypass reach.'	9/25/2002 8:49:24 AM		4		
2461	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/25/2002 8:59:44 AM		3		
2462	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/25/2002 8:59:44 AM		3		
2463	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report records turbidity ratings of 0.18-1.7 NTU.  Some turbidity is likely to occur during storm events below Ole and Rain Creeks.'	9/18/2002 9:32:33 AM		3		
2464	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report records turbidity ratings of 0.18-1.7 NTU.  Some turbidity is likely to occur during storm events below Ole and Rain Creeks.'	9/18/2002 9:32:33 AM		3		
2465	WG	'Pacifc Corp FERC report states there is no LWD in this reach greater than 12" in diameter.  Only small LWD is present. Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:05 PM		1		
2466	WG	'Pacifc Corp FERC report states there is no LWD in this reach greater than 12" in diameter.  Only small LWD is present. Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:05 PM		3		
2467	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC report, TEMPLATE:  ASSUMED SLIGHTLY NARROWER THAN DOWNSTREAM REACH'	8/30/2002 12:45:54 PM		1		
2468	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC report, TEMPLATE:  ASSUMED SLIGHTLY NARROWER THAN DOWNSTREAM REACH'	8/30/2002 12:45:54 PM		4		
2469	NKA	'PATIENT: Pacific Corp FERC report.  TEMPLATE:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach'	9/18/2002 9:23:48 AM		1		
2470	NKA	'PATIENT: Pacific Corp FERC report.  TEMPLATE:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach'	9/18/2002 9:23:48 AM		4		
2471	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:11:44 PM		1		
2472	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:11:44 PM		4		
2473	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:29 PM		1		
2474	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:21:29 PM		4		
2475	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:34 AM		3		
2476	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:34 AM		4		
2477	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:18:48 AM		2		
2478	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:18:48 AM		2		
2479	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 12:58:30 PM		1		
2480	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 12:58:30 PM		3		
2481	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:22 PM		1		
2482	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:22 PM		4		
2483	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:04 PM		3		
2484	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:04 PM		3		
2485	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:00 PM		3		
2486	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:00 PM		4		
2487	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:46 PM		1		
2488	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:46 PM		4		
2489		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:36 PM		4		
2490		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:36 PM		4		
2491	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:54 PM		1		
2492	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:00:54 PM		4		
2493	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:37 PM		3		
2494	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:37 PM		3		
2495	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:25:13 AM		1		
2496	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:25:13 AM		2		
2497	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 11:35:47 AM		1		
2498	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 11:35:47 AM		2		
2499	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:05:40 PM		1		
2500	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:05:40 PM		2		
2501	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12'	9/18/2002 2:58:56 PM		1		
2502	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12'	9/18/2002 2:58:56 PM		3		
2503	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:14 PM		1		
2504	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:14 PM		2		
2505	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:49:55 PM		1		
2506	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:49:55 PM		2		
2507	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:24 PM		1		
2508	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:24 PM		4		
2509	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:31 PM		4		
2510	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:31 PM		4		
2511	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:17 PM		1		
2512	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:17 PM		4		
2513	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:06:49 PM		1		
2514	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:06:49 PM		4		
2515	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template: Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:01:49 AM		4		
2516	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template: Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:01:49 AM		2		
2517	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:03 PM		1		
2518	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:03 PM		4		
2519	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:10 PM		1		
2520	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:07:10 PM		4		
2521	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:06:55 PM		1		
2522	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:06:55 PM		4		
2523	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:37:41 AM		4		
2524	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:15 PM		2		
2525	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:15 PM		2		
2526	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:20 PM		2		
2527	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:20 PM		2		
2528	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:11 PM		2		
2529	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:11 PM		2		
2530	nka	'dam at lower end of reach'	8/30/2002 12:58:53 PM		1		
2531	nka	'dam at lower end of reach'	8/30/2002 12:58:53 PM		3		
2532	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:16:48 AM		2		
2533	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:16:48 AM		2		
2534	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:15 AM		3		
2535	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:15 AM		4		
2536	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:54:45 AM		1		
2537	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:54:45 AM		3		
2538	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily minimum temp readings of 4.1and 3.8 degrees at two guages on several occassions in February of 2000 at Swift tailrace. Averaged these min temps to get rating.  Template:  assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:27:44 AM		1		
2539	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily minimum temp readings of 4.1and 3.8 degrees at two guages on several occassions in February of 2000 at Swift tailrace. Averaged these min temps to get rating.  Template:  assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:27:44 AM		3		
2540	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC report documents max temp at two Swift Reservoir tailrace sites.  Max at one site was 13.9 and 15.4 at the other site.  Averaged these to come up with this rating. Max temps occurred in September.      Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:49:37 AM		1		
2541	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC report documents max temp at two Swift Reservoir tailrace sites.  Max at one site was 13.9 and 15.4 at the other site.  Averaged these to come up with this rating. Max temps occurred in September.      Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:49:37 AM		3		
2542	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:47:36 AM		3		
2543	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:47:36 AM		3		
2544	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:05 PM		1		
2545	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:05 PM		4		
2546	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:17 PM		2		
2547	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:17 PM		3		
2548	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:03 PM		3		
2549	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:03 PM		4		
2550	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:03 PM		3		
2551	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:03 PM		4		
2552	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:05 PM		1		
2553	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:05 PM		4		
2554	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:22 PM		1		
2555	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:22 PM		4		
2556	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:44 AM		3		
2557	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:44 AM		4		
2558	KM	'Topo shows unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:15:04 PM		2		
2559	KM	'Topo shows unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:15:04 PM		2		
2560	nka	'Reservoir had inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:02:48 PM		1		
2561	nka	'Reservoir had inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:02:48 PM		3		
2562	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:29 PM		1		
2563	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:29 PM		4		
2564	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:18 PM		3		
2565	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:18 PM		3		
2566	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:12 PM		3		
2567	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:12 PM		4		
2568	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:09 PM		1		
2569	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:09 PM		4		
2570		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:43 PM		4		
2571		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:43 PM		4		
2572	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:19 PM		1		
2573	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:19 PM		4		
2574	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:21 PM		3		
2575	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:21 PM		3		
2576	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:25:41 AM		1		
2577	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:25:41 AM		2		
2578	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:09 PM		1		
2579	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:09 PM		2		
2580	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:05:57 PM		1		
2581	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:05:57 PM		2		
2582		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12'	9/18/2002 2:59:17 PM		1		
2583		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12'	9/18/2002 2:59:17 PM		3		
2584	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:26 PM		1		
2585	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:26 PM		2		
2586	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:09 PM		1		
2587	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:09 PM		2		
2588	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:09:05 PM		1		
2589	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:09:05 PM		4		
2590	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:09:13 PM		4		
2591	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:09:13 PM		4		
2592	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:59 PM		1		
2593	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:59 PM		4		
2594	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:33 PM		1		
2595	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:33 PM		4		
2596	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:02:00 AM		4		
2597	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:02:00 AM		2		
2598	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:47 PM		1		
2599	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:47 PM		4		
2600	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:53 PM		1		
2601	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:53 PM		4		
2602	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:40 PM		1		
2603	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:08:40 PM		4		
2604	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:39 PM		2		
2605	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:39 PM		2		
2606	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:43 PM		2		
2607	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:43 PM		2		
2608	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:35 PM		2		
2609	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:37:35 PM		2		
2610	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:05 AM		2		
2611	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:05 AM		2		
2612	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:22 AM		3		
2613	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:22 AM		4		
2614	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:55:18 AM		1		
2615	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:55:18 AM		3		
2616	WG	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:51:14 AM		2		
2617	WG	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:51:14 AM		3		
2618	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 13.'	9/25/2002 8:49:47 AM		1		
2619	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 13.'	9/25/2002 8:49:47 AM		4		
2620	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:47:54 AM		3		
2621	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:47:54 AM		3		
2622	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:15 PM		1		
2623	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:15 PM		4		
2624	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:27 PM		2		
2625	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:27 PM		3		
2626	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:07 PM		3		
2627	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:07 PM		4		
2628	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:07 PM		3		
2629	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:07 PM		4		
2630	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:13 PM		1		
2631	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:13 PM		4		
2632	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:36 PM		1		
2633	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:36 PM		4		
2634	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:59 AM		3		
2635	WG	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:07:59 AM		4		
2636	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:15:39 PM		2		
2637	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:15:39 PM		2		
2638	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the flood plain'	8/30/2002 1:43:44 PM		1		
2639	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the flood plain'	8/30/2002 1:43:44 PM		4		
2640	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:34 PM		1		
2641	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:34 PM		4		
2642	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:32 PM		3		
2643	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:32 PM		3		
2644	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:27 PM		3		
2645	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:27 PM		4		
2646	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:32 PM		1		
2647	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:32 PM		4		
2648		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:50 PM		4		
2649		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:50 PM		4		
2650	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:37 PM		1		
2651	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:37 PM		4		
2652	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:51 PM		3		
2653	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:08:51 PM		3		
2654	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:26:12 AM		1		
2655	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:26:12 AM		2		
2656	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:28 PM		1		
2657	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:28 PM		2		
2658	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:13 PM		1		
2659	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:13 PM		2		
2660	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:03 PM		1		
2661	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:03 PM		3		
2662	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:34 PM		1		
2663	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:34 PM		2		
2664	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:18 PM		1		
2665	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:18 PM		2		
2666	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:46 PM		1		
2667	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:46 PM		4		
2668	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:53 PM		4		
2669	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:53 PM		4		
2670	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:41 PM		1		
2671	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:41 PM		4		
2672	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:19 PM		1		
2673	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:19 PM		4		
2674	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area showing historical braiding of stream in this area.'	2/10/2003 12:52:03 PM		4		
2675	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area showing historical braiding of stream in this area.'	2/10/2003 12:52:03 PM		2		
2676	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:30 PM		1		
2677	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:30 PM		4		
2678	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:35 PM		1		
2679	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:35 PM		4		
2680	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:24 PM		1		
2681	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:10:24 PM		4		
2682	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:08 AM		4		
2683	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:06 PM		2		
2684	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:06 PM		2		
2685	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:11 PM		2		
2686	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:11 PM		2		
2687	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:02 PM		2		
2688	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:02 PM		2		
2689	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:30 AM		2		
2690	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:30 AM		2		
2691	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:30 AM		3		
2692	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:30 AM		4		
2693	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:55:38 AM		1		
2694	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:55:38 AM		3		
2695	NKA	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:50:58 AM		2		
2696	NKA	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:50:58 AM		3		
2697	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/25/2002 8:49:55 AM		1		
2698	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/25/2002 8:49:55 AM		4		
2699	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:48:15 AM		3		
2700	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:48:15 AM		3		
2701	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:23 PM		1		
2702	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:23 PM		4		
2703	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:38 PM		2		
2704	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:38 PM		3		
2705	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:11 PM		3		
2706	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:11 PM		4		
2707	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:11 PM		3		
2708	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:11 PM		4		
2709	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:22 PM		1		
2710	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:22 PM		4		
2711		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:46 PM		1		
2712		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:46 PM		4		
2713	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:08:14 AM		3		
2714	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:08:14 AM		4		
2715	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:16:12 PM		2		
2716	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:16:12 PM		2		
2717	nka	'Reservoir has inundated floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:46:39 PM		1		
2718	nka	'Reservoir has inundated floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:46:39 PM		3		
2719	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:42 PM		1		
2720	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:42 PM		4		
2721	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:49 PM		3		
2722	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:14:49 PM		3		
2723	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:37 PM		3		
2724	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:37 PM		4		
2725	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:54 PM		1		
2726	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:01:54 PM		4		
2727		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:56 PM		4		
2728		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:56 PM		4		
2729	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:01 PM		1		
2730	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:01 PM		4		
2731	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:09:03 PM		3		
2732	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:09:03 PM		3		
2733	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:26:44 AM		1		
2734	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:26:44 AM		2		
2735	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:43 PM		1		
2736	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:43 PM		2		
2737	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:27 PM		1		
2738	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:27 PM		2		
2739		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:17 PM		1		
2740		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:17 PM		3		
2741	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:43 PM		1		
2742	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:43 PM		2		
2743	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:28 PM		1		
2744	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:28 PM		2		
2745	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:43 PM		1		
2746	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:43 PM		4		
2747	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:48 PM		4		
2748	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:48 PM		4		
2749	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:22 PM		1		
2750	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:22 PM		4		
2751	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:11:56 PM		1		
2752	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:11:56 PM		4		
2753	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:54 PM		1		
2754	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:54 PM		3		
2755	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:06 PM		1		
2756	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:06 PM		4		
2757	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:16 PM		1		
2758	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:16 PM		4		
2759	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:01 PM		1		
2760	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:12:01 PM		4		
2761	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:19 AM		4		
2762	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:19 AM		4		
2763		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:28 PM		2		
2764		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:28 PM		2		
2765		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:33 PM		2		
2766		'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:33 PM		2		
2767	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:25 PM		2		
2768	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:25 PM		2		
2769		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Used my best guess'	8/29/2002 1:26:29 PM		1		
2770		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Used my best guess'	8/29/2002 1:26:29 PM		3		
2771	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:57 AM		2		
2772	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:17:57 AM		2		
2773	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:36 AM		3		
2774	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:36 AM		4		
2775	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:56:00 AM		1		
2776	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:56:00 AM		3		
2777	NKA	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:50:10 AM		2		
2778	NKA	'Assumed warmer than Lewis 17 and cooler than Lewis 13.'	9/17/2002 9:50:10 AM		3		
2779	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/25/2002 8:50:06 AM		2		
2780	NKA	'Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/25/2002 8:50:06 AM		4		
2781	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:48:33 AM		3		
2782	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:48:33 AM		3		
2783	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:35 PM		1		
2784	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:35 PM		4		
2785	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:47 PM		2		
2786	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:51:47 PM		3		
2787	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:15 PM		3		
2788	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:15 PM		4		
2789	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:15 PM		3		
2790	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:15 PM		4		
2791	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:29 PM		1		
2792	WG	'Data from Pacific Corp. FERC report documents alkalinity ranging from 14-38 mg/L in Swift Reservoir at various locations.  Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:12:29 PM		4		
2793	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:59 PM		1		
2794	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:22:59 PM		4		
2795	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:08:28 AM		3		
2796	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:08:28 AM		4		
2797	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:16:55 PM		4		
2798	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:16:55 PM		4		
2799	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:48:38 PM		2		
2800	nka	'Reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 1:48:38 PM		3		
2801	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:48 PM		1		
2802	nka	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - November. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:56:48 PM		4		
2803	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:12:38 PM		3		
2804	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:12:38 PM		3		
2805	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:48 PM		3		
2806	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:04:48 PM		4		
2807	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:17 PM		1		
2808	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:17 PM		4		
2809		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:06:04 PM		4		
2810		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:06:04 PM		4		
2811	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:24 PM		1		
2812	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 1:02:24 PM		4		
2813	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:09:15 PM		3		
2814	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:09:15 PM		3		
2815	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:27:23 AM		1		
2816	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  15 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:27:23 AM		2		
2817	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:58 PM		1		
2818	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:19:58 PM		2		
2819	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:47 PM		1		
2820	WG	'Brook, Brown, northern pikeminnow.  In template conditions, pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:06:47 PM		2		
2821		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:30 PM		1		
2822		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 12 & 18.'	9/18/2002 3:00:30 PM		3		
2823	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:52 PM		1		
2824	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:15:52 PM		2		
2825	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:39 PM		1		
2826	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between steelhead and hatchery rainbow.'	9/16/2002 12:50:39 PM		2		
2827	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:18 PM		1		
2828	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:18 PM		4		
2829	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:34 PM		4		
2830	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:34 PM		4		
2831	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:12 PM		4		
2832	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:13:50 PM		1		
2833	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:13:50 PM		4		
2834	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:39 PM		1		
2835	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:39 PM		2		
2836	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:01 PM		1		
2837	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:01 PM		4		
2838	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:06 PM		1		
2839	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:14:06 PM		4		
2840	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:13:55 PM		1		
2841	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:13:55 PM		4		
2842	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:32 AM		4		
2843	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:55 PM		2		
2844	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:55 PM		2		
2845	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:59 PM		2		
2846	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:59 PM		2		
2847	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:50 PM		2		
2848	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:38:50 PM		2		
2849	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:18:13 AM		2		
2850	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:18:13 AM		2		
2851	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:43 AM		3		
2852	WG	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:03:43 AM		4		
2853	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:56:26 AM		1		
2854	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:56:26 AM		3		
2855	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents a minimum temp reading of 1.1 degrees on 1/13/00 at head of reservoir.'	9/17/2002 9:23:27 AM		1		
2856	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents a minimum temp reading of 1.1 degrees on 1/13/00 at head of reservoir.'	9/17/2002 9:23:27 AM		3		
2857	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report temps at head of the reservoir.  Data for 1999, and max temp = 15.1 on 8/19.  Template:  assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:02 AM		1		
2858	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report temps at head of the reservoir.  Data for 1999, and max temp = 15.1 on 8/19.  Template:  assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:02 AM		4		
2859	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:53:51 AM		3		
2860	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:53:51 AM		3		
2861	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:44 PM		1		
2862	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 8NTU in Swift Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:39:44 PM		4		
2863	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:52:00 PM		2		
2864	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:52:00 PM		3		
2865	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:40 PM		3		
2866	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:40 PM		4		
2867	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:40 PM		3		
2868	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 11 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:22:40 PM		4		
2869	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:13:36 PM		2		
2870	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:13:36 PM		4		
2871	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:23:30 PM		4		
2872	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:23:30 PM		4		
2873	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:02 AM		3		
2874	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:02 AM		3		
2875	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:20:33 AM		2		
2876	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:20:33 AM		2		
2877	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:25 PM		1		
2878	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:25 PM		4		
2879	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:29:26 PM		4		
2880	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:29:26 PM		4		
2881	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/28/2002 10:06:41 AM		4		
2882	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/28/2002 10:06:41 AM		4		
2883	WG	'Assumed higher than Lewis 24-27 because of influences of Pine Creek and Muddy River.'	9/19/2002 3:22:00 PM		3		
2884	WG	'Assumed higher than Lewis 24-27 because of influences of Pine Creek and Muddy River.'	9/19/2002 3:22:00 PM		4		
2885	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:31:00 AM		1		
2886	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:31:00 AM		2		
2887	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:22:29 PM		1		
2888	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:22:29 PM		2		
2889	WG	'Brook and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 4:08:15 PM		1		
2890	WG	'Brook and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 4:08:15 PM		2		
2891	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:48:18 PM		2		
2892	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:48:18 PM		3		
2893	WG	'Road access and a campground'	9/16/2002 1:22:54 PM		1		
2894	WG	'Road access and a campground'	9/16/2002 1:22:54 PM		2		
2895	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:52:13 PM		1		
2896	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:52:13 PM		2		
2897	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:19 AM		3		
2898	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:19 AM		4		
2899	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:23 AM		3		
2900	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:23 AM		4		
2901	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:15 AM		3		
2902	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:15 AM		4		
2903	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:33 AM		3		
2904	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:33 AM		4		
2905	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:26 AM		3		
2906	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:26 AM		4		
2907	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:16 AM		3		
2908	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:16 AM		4		
2909	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:03:02 AM		3		
2910	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:03:02 AM		4		
2911	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:27 AM		3		
2912	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:27 AM		4		
2913	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:48 AM		4		
2914	NKA	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:38:48 AM		4		
2915	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:48:23 PM		2		
2916	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:48:23 PM		2		
2917	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:23 PM		2		
2918	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:23 PM		2		
2919	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:28 PM		2		
2920	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:28 PM		2		
2921	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:19 PM		2		
2922	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:19 PM		2		
2923	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:03 AM		2		
2924	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:03 AM		2		
2925	WG	'Patient is slightly higher based on a road crossing in this reach.'	9/17/2002 10:12:14 AM		2		
2926	WG	'Patient is slightly higher based on a road crossing in this reach.'	9/17/2002 10:12:14 AM		2		
2927	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:00 AM		1		
2928	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:00 AM		3		
2929	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:51:59 AM		2		
2930	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:51:59 AM		3		
2931	nka	'FERC report max temp 16.3.  Template was lower due to lower temps in muddy river and limited logging in headwaters and tributaries.'	9/17/2002 8:54:17 AM		1		
2932	nka	'FERC report max temp 16.3.  Template was lower due to lower temps in muddy river and limited logging in headwaters and tributaries.'	9/17/2002 8:54:17 AM		4		
2933	WG	'Moderately confined channel may have groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:49:42 AM		3		
2934	WG	'Moderately confined channel may have groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:49:42 AM		3		
2935	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:35:24 PM		3		
2936	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:35:24 PM		4		
2937	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:34:59 AM		2		
2938	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:34:59 AM		3		
2939		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:56:52 PM		2		
2940		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:56:52 PM		4		
2941	NKA	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	9/17/2002 1:36:51 PM		2		
2942	NKA	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	9/17/2002 1:36:51 PM		4		
2943	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:13:52 PM		2		
2944	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:13:52 PM		4		
2945	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:23:51 PM		4		
2946	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:23:51 PM		4		
2947	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:14 AM		3		
2948	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:14 AM		3		
2949	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:23:24 AM		2		
2950	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:23:24 AM		2		
2951	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:36 PM		1		
2952	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:36 PM		4		
2953	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:14 PM		4		
2954	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:14 PM		4		
2955	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		4		
2956	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		4		
2957	WG	'Assumed higher than Lewis 24-27 because of influences of Muddy.'	9/19/2002 3:22:39 PM		3		
2958	WG	'Assumed higher than Lewis 24-27 because of influences of Muddy.'	9/19/2002 3:22:39 PM		4		
2959	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:04 AM		1		
2960	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:04 AM		2		
2961	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:22:52 PM		1		
2962	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:22:52 PM		2		
2963	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:04 PM		1		
2964	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:04 PM		2		
2965	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:48:06 PM		2		
2966	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:48:06 PM		3		
2967	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:17 PM		1		
2968	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:17 PM		2		
2969	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:31 PM		1		
2970	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:31 PM		2		
2971		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:32 PM		4		
2972		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:32 PM		4		
2973		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:37 PM		4		
2974		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:37 PM		4		
2975		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:28 PM		4		
2976		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:28 PM		4		
2977	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:13 PM		4		
2978	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:13 PM		4		
2979	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:10:25 AM		4		
2980	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:10:25 AM		4		
2981		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:21 PM		4		
2982		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:21 PM		4		
2983		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:24 PM		4		
2984		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:24 PM		4		
2985		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:17 PM		4		
2986		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:53:17 PM		4		
2987	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:20 AM		4		
2988	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:20 AM		4		
2989	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		2		
2990	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		2		
2991	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:49 PM		2		
2992	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:49 PM		2		
2993	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:53 PM		2		
2994	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:53 PM		2		
2995	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:45 PM		2		
2996	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:39:45 PM		2		
2997	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:14 AM		2		
2998	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:14 AM		2		
2999	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:11:08 AM		2		
3000	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:11:08 AM		2		
3001	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:26 AM		2		
3002	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:26 AM		3		
3003	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:52:45 AM		2		
3004	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:52:45 AM		3		
3005	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Lewis 18 because of inputs of Muddy river.'	9/17/2002 8:56:03 AM		3		
3006	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Lewis 18 because of inputs of Muddy river.'	9/17/2002 8:56:03 AM		3		
3007	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:50:19 AM		3		
3008	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:50:19 AM		3		
3009	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.  This reach is rated slightly more turbid than others due to Muddy River influence'	9/16/2002 3:35:57 PM		2		
3010	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.  This reach is rated slightly more turbid than others due to Muddy River influence'	9/16/2002 3:35:57 PM		4		
3011	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:25 AM		2		
3012	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:25 AM		3		
3013		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		2		
3014		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		4		
3015	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		2		
3016	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:57:20 PM		4		
3017	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 9:57:06 AM		3		
3018	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 9:57:06 AM		4		
3019	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 9:57:06 AM		1		
3020	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 9:57:06 AM		4		
3021	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:03 PM		2		
3022	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:03 PM		4		
3023	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:06 PM		4		
3024	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:06 PM		4		
3025	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:26 AM		3		
3026	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:26 AM		3		
3027	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:22 AM		2		
3028	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:22 AM		2		
3029	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:44 PM		1		
3030	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:44 PM		4		
3031	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:31 PM		3		
3032	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:31 PM		4		
3033	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		4		
3034	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		4		
3035	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:16:16 PM		3		
3036	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:16:16 PM		4		
3037	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:29 AM		1		
3038	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:29 AM		2		
3039	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:29:41 PM		1		
3040	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:29:41 PM		2		
3041	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:16 PM		1		
3042	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:16 PM		2		
3043	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:47:49 PM		2		
3044	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:47:49 PM		3		
3045	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:26 PM		1		
3046	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:26 PM		2		
3047	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:37 PM		1		
3048	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:37 PM		2		
3049	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:56 AM		3		
3050	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:56 AM		4		
3051	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:59 AM		3		
3052	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:59 AM		4		
3053	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:52 AM		3		
3054	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:52 AM		4		
3055	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:24 AM		3		
3056	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:24 AM		4		
3057	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:04 AM		3		
3058	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:04:04 AM		4		
3059	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:08 AM		3		
3060	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:08 AM		4		
3061	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:50 AM		3		
3062	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:50 AM		4		
3063	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:16 AM		3		
3064	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:16 AM		4		
3065	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:32 AM		4		
3066	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:32 AM		4		
3067	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		2		
3068	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		2		
3069	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:14 PM		2		
3070	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:14 PM		2		
3071	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:19 PM		2		
3072	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:19 PM		2		
3073	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:10 PM		2		
3074	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:10 PM		2		
3075	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:24 AM		2		
3076	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:24 AM		2		
3077	WG	'Patient is slightly higher based on a road crossing in this reach.'	9/17/2002 10:11:43 AM		2		
3078	WG	'Patient is slightly higher based on a road crossing in this reach.'	9/17/2002 10:11:43 AM		2		
3079	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:42 AM		2		
3080	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:02:42 AM		3		
3081	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:52:59 AM		2		
3082	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:52:59 AM		4		
3083	WG	'Assumed slightly cooler than Lewis 18 because of Rush Cr. influence.'	9/17/2002 5:25:27 PM		3		
3084	WG	'Assumed slightly cooler than Lewis 18 because of Rush Cr. influence.'	9/17/2002 5:25:27 PM		4		
3085	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:53:24 AM		3		
3086	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:53:24 AM		3		
3087	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. This reach is rated slightly less turbid than upstream due to influence of clear Rush Cr. water.'	9/16/2002 3:36:37 PM		2		
3088	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. This reach is rated slightly less turbid than upstream due to influence of clear Rush Cr. water.'	9/16/2002 3:36:37 PM		4		
3089	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:42 AM		2		
3090	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:42 AM		3		
3091		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		2		
3092		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 3:58:35 PM		4		
3093	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:10:02 PM		2		
3094	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:10:02 PM		4		
3095	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:11 PM		2		
3096	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:11 PM		4		
3097	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:17 PM		4		
3098	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:17 PM		4		
3099	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:36 AM		3		
3100	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:36 AM		3		
3101	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:37 AM		2		
3102	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:37 AM		2		
3103	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:52 PM		1		
3104	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:59:52 PM		4		
3105	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:47 PM		3		
3106	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:30:47 PM		4		
3107	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		4		
3108	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		4		
3109	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:15:19 PM		3		
3110	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:15:19 PM		4		
3111	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:50 AM		1		
3112	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:34:50 AM		2		
3113	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:29:54 PM		1		
3114	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:29:54 PM		2		
3115	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:28 PM		1		
3116	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:28 PM		2		
3117	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:47:19 PM		2		
3118	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:47:19 PM		3		
3119	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:32 PM		1		
3120	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:32 PM		2		
3121	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:44 PM		1		
3122	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:44 PM		2		
3123		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:58 PM		4		
3124		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:58 PM		4		
3125		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:57:02 PM		4		
3126		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:57:02 PM		4		
3127		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:53 PM		4		
3128		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:53 PM		4		
3129	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:41 PM		4		
3130	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:41 PM		4		
3131	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:11:09 AM		4		
3132	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:11:09 AM		4		
3133		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:47 PM		4		
3134		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:47 PM		4		
3135		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:50 PM		4		
3136		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:50 PM		4		
3137		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:43 PM		4		
3138		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 7:56:43 PM		4		
3139	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:42 AM		4		
3140	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:42 AM		4		
3141	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		2		
3142	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		2		
3143	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:44 PM		2		
3144	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:44 PM		2		
3145	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:49 PM		2		
3146	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:49 PM		2		
3147	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:40 PM		2		
3148	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:40:40 PM		2		
3149	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:37 AM		2		
3150	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:37 AM		2		
3151	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:30 AM		2		
3152	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:30 AM		2		
3153	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:01 AM		2		
3154	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:01 AM		3		
3155	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:15 AM		2		
3156	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:15 AM		4		
3157	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:58:19 AM		3		
3158	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:58:19 AM		4		
3159	WG	'Moderately confined.  Limited influx of groundwater is likely.'	9/17/2002 7:51:52 AM		3		
3160	WG	'Moderately confined.  Limited influx of groundwater is likely.'	9/17/2002 7:51:52 AM		3		
3161	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:36:49 PM		2		
3162	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:36:49 PM		4		
3163	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:56 AM		2		
3164	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:35:56 AM		3		
3165		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		3		
3166		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		4		
3167	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		3		
3168	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:00:05 PM		4		
3169	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:20 PM		2		
3170	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:20 PM		4		
3171	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:30 PM		4		
3172	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:30 PM		4		
3173	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:48 AM		3		
3174	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:07:48 AM		3		
3175	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:56 AM		2		
3176	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:21:56 AM		2		
3177	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:00 PM		1		
3178	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:00 PM		4		
3179	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:31:05 PM		3		
3180	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:31:05 PM		4		
3181	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		4		
3182	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		4		
3183	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:14:52 PM		3		
3184	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	3/9/2003 10:14:52 PM		4		
3185	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:10 AM		1		
3186	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:10 AM		2		
3187	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:09 PM		1		
3188	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:09 PM		2		
3189	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:42 PM		1		
3190	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:42 PM		2		
3191	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:46:44 PM		2		
3192	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:46:44 PM		3		
3193	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:40 PM		1		
3194	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:40 PM		2		
3195	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:51 PM		1		
3196	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:51 PM		2		
3197	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:34 AM		3		
3198	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:34 AM		4		
3199	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:37 AM		3		
3200	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:37 AM		4		
3201	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:30 AM		3		
3202	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:30 AM		4		
3203	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:17 AM		3		
3204	nka	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 11:00:17 AM		4		
3205	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:41 AM		3		
3206	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 11:03:41 AM		4		
3207	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:00 AM		3		
3208	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:00 AM		4		
3209	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:42 AM		3		
3210	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 11:02:42 AM		4		
3211	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:04 AM		3		
3212	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 11:01:04 AM		4		
3213	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:56 AM		4		
3214	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:39:56 AM		4		
3215	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		2		
3216	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		2		
3217	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:08 PM		2		
3218	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:08 PM		2		
3219	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:12 PM		2		
3220	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:12 PM		2		
3221	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:04 PM		2		
3222	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:04 PM		2		
3223	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:52 AM		2		
3224	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:20:52 AM		2		
3225	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:43 AM		2		
3226	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:43 AM		2		
3227	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:32 AM		2		
3228	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:32 AM		3		
3229	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:31 AM		2		
3230	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:31 AM		4		
3231	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:58:51 AM		3		
3232	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:58:51 AM		4		
3233	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:52:31 AM		3		
3234	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:52:31 AM		3		
3235	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:00 PM		2		
3236	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:00 PM		4		
3237	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:10 AM		2		
3238	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:10 AM		3		
3239		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		3		
3240		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		4		
3241	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		3		
3242	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:02:02 PM		4		
3243	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:29 PM		2		
3244	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:29 PM		4		
3245	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:45 PM		4		
3246	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:45 PM		4		
3247	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:00 AM		3		
3248	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:00 AM		3		
3249	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:10 AM		2		
3250	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:10 AM		2		
3251	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:08 PM		1		
3252	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:08 PM		4		
3253	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:31:33 PM		3		
3254	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 3:31:33 PM		4		
3255	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		4		
3256	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		4		
3257	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	9/19/2002 3:25:50 PM		3		
3258	WG	'Assumed same as Lewis 24-27.'	9/19/2002 3:25:50 PM		4		
3259	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:28 AM		1		
3260	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:28 AM		2		
3261	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:23 PM		1		
3262	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:23 PM		2		
3263	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:51 PM		1		
3264	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:09:51 PM		2		
3265	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:46:05 PM		2		
3266	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:46:05 PM		3		
3267	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:47 PM		1		
3268	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
3269	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:58 PM		1		
3270	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:56:58 PM		2		
3271		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:20 PM		4		
3272		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:20 PM		4		
3273		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:24 PM		4		
3274		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:24 PM		4		
3275		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:17 PM		4		
3276		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:17 PM		4		
3277	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:00 PM		4		
3278	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:00 PM		4		
3279	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:12:04 AM		4		
3280	NKA	'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:12:04 AM		4		
3281		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:08 PM		4		
3282		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:08 PM		4		
3283		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:13 PM		4		
3284		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:13 PM		4		
3285		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:04 PM		4		
3286		'Assumed similar to Lewis 20 based on confinement.  Assigned a little more riffle and a little less pool because it has a higher gradient than Lewis 20.  (1.1 compared to 0.5).'	9/19/2002 8:06:04 PM		4		
3287	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:06 AM		4		
3288	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:06 AM		4		
3289	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		2		
3290	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		2		
3291	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:33 PM		2		
3292	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:33 PM		2		
3293	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:37 PM		2		
3294	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:37 PM		2		
3295	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:28 PM		2		
3296	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:28 PM		2		
3297	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:05 AM		2		
3298	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:05 AM		2		
3299	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:53 AM		2		
3300	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:12:53 AM		2		
3301	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:47 AM		2		
3302	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:03:47 AM		3		
3303	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:49 AM		3		
3304	NKA	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:53:49 AM		4		
3305	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:59:09 AM		3		
3306	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:59:09 AM		4		
3307	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:53:36 AM		3		
3308	WG	'Reach moderately confined to confined.  Potential for limited groundwater influx.'	9/17/2002 7:53:36 AM		3		
3309	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:12 PM		2		
3310	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:12 PM		4		
3311	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:22 AM		2		
3312	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:22 AM		3		
3313		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		3		
3314		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		4		
3315	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		3		
3316	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/29/2002 4:03:54 PM		4		
3317	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:38 PM		2		
3318	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:38 PM		4		
3319	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:57 PM		4		
3320	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:24:57 PM		4		
3321	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:11 AM		3		
3322	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:11 AM		3		
3323	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:26 AM		2		
3324	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:26 AM		2		
3325	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:16 PM		1		
3326	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:16 PM		4		
3327	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 8:11:02 AM		3		
3328	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 8:11:02 AM		4		
3329	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/30/2002 2:26:25 PM		4		
3330	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/30/2002 2:26:25 PM		4		
3331	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/19/2002 8:10:08 AM		3		
3332	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/19/2002 8:10:08 AM		4		
3333	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:50 AM		1		
3334	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:35:50 AM		2		
3335	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:38 PM		1		
3336	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:38 PM		2		
3337	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:06 PM		1		
3338	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:06 PM		2		
3339	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:44:38 PM		2		
3340	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:44:38 PM		3		
3341	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:57 PM		1		
3342	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:23:57 PM		2		
3343	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:05 PM		1		
3344	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:05 PM		2		
3345		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:30 PM		4		
3346		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:30 PM		4		
3347		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:34 PM		4		
3348		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:34 PM		4		
3349		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:26 PM		4		
3350		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:26 PM		4		
3351	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:13 PM		4		
3352	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:13 PM		4		
3353		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:10 AM		4		
3354		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:10 AM		4		
3355		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:19 PM		4		
3356		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:19 PM		4		
3357		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:23 PM		4		
3358		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:23 PM		4		
3359		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:16 PM		4		
3360		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on gradient and confinement.'	9/19/2002 8:05:16 PM		4		
3361	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:17 AM		4		
3362	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:17 AM		4		
3363	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:05:12 PM		2		
3364	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:05:12 PM		2		
3365	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:57 PM		2		
3366	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:57 PM		2		
3367	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:01 PM		2		
3368	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:01 PM		2		
3369	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:52 PM		2		
3370	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:41:52 PM		2		
3371	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:21 AM		2		
3372	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:21 AM		2		
3373	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:13:42 AM		2		
3374	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:13:42 AM		2		
3375	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:06 AM		2		
3376	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:06 AM		3		
3377	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:04 AM		3		
3378	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:04 AM		4		
3379	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:59:38 AM		3		
3380	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 8:59:38 AM		4		
3381	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:54:07 AM		3		
3382	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:54:07 AM		3		
3383	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:24 PM		2		
3384	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:24 PM		4		
3385	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:36 AM		2		
3386	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:36 AM		3		
3387		' Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:26:45 PM		3		
3388		' Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:26:45 PM		4		
3389	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:26:39 PM		3		
3390	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:26:39 PM		4		
3391	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:47 PM		2		
3392	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:47 PM		4		
3393	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:08 PM		4		
3394	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:08 PM		4		
3395	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:23 AM		3		
3396	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:23 AM		3		
3397	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:40 AM		2		
3398	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:40 AM		2		
3399	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:25 PM		1		
3400	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:25 PM		4		
3401	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 8:10:45 AM		3		
3402	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/19/2002 8:10:45 AM		3		
3403	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:07:13 PM		4		
3404	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:07:13 PM		4		
3405	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/19/2002 8:09:41 AM		3		
3406	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/19/2002 8:09:41 AM		4		
3407	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:13 AM		1		
3408	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:13 AM		2		
3409	WG	' Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:52 PM		1		
3410	WG	' Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:30:52 PM		2		
3411	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:17 PM		1		
3412	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:17 PM		2		
3413	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:43:49 PM		2		
3414	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:43:49 PM		3		
3415	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:24:05 PM		1		
3416	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:24:05 PM		2		
3417	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:12 PM		1		
3418	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:12 PM		2		
3419		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:24 PM		4		
3420		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:24 PM		4		
3421		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:29 PM		4		
3422		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:29 PM		4		
3423		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:19 PM		4		
3424		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:19 PM		4		
3425	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:56 PM		4		
3426	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:56 PM		4		
3427		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:26 AM		4		
3428		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 20 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:26 AM		4		
3429		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:09 PM		4		
3430		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:09 PM		4		
3431		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:14 PM		4		
3432		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:14 PM		4		
3433		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:04 PM		4		
3434		'Assumed similar to Lewis 27 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:12:04 PM		4		
3435	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:29 AM		4		
3436	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:29 AM		4		
3437	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:07:13 PM		2		
3438	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:07:13 PM		2		
3439	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:20 PM		2		
3440	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:20 PM		2		
3441	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:24 PM		2		
3442	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:24 PM		2		
3443	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:16 PM		2		
3444	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:16 PM		2		
3445	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:35 AM		2		
3446	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:35 AM		2		
3447	WG	'Patient is rated slightly higher because of a road crossing in the reach.'	9/17/2002 10:14:12 AM		2		
3448	WG	'Patient is rated slightly higher because of a road crossing in the reach.'	9/17/2002 10:14:12 AM		2		
3449	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:24 AM		2		
3450	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:24 AM		3		
3451	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:17 AM		2		
3452	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:17 AM		4		
3453	WG	'USFS Temperature from Lewis below Crab Cr. in 1997 showed that temps exceeded 16 in two days during the summer.'	9/17/2002 5:20:28 PM		2		
3454	WG	'USFS Temperature from Lewis below Crab Cr. in 1997 showed that temps exceeded 16 in two days during the summer.'	9/17/2002 5:20:28 PM		4		
3455	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:54:27 AM		3		
3456	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:54:27 AM		3		
3457	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:37 PM		2		
3458	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:37 PM		4		
3459	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:49 AM		2		
3460	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:36:49 AM		3		
3461		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:27:23 PM		3		
3462		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:27:23 PM		4		
3463	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:27:17 PM		3		
3464	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:27:17 PM		4		
3465	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:58 PM		2		
3466	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:14:58 PM		4		
3467	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:22 PM		4		
3468	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:22 PM		4		
3469	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:34 AM		3		
3470	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:34 AM		3		
3471	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:55 AM		2		
3472	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:22:55 AM		2		
3473	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:33 PM		1		
3474	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:33 PM		4		
3475	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:15:45 PM		3		
3476	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:15:45 PM		3		
3477	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:08:09 PM		4		
3478	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:08:09 PM		4		
3479	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:52:56 PM		3		
3480	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:52:56 PM		3		
3481	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:35 AM		1		
3482	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:35 AM		2		
3483	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:31:09 PM		1		
3484	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:31:09 PM		2		
3485	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:29 PM		1		
3486	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:29 PM		2		
3487	nka	' Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:42:57 PM		2		
3488	nka	' Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:42:57 PM		3		
3489	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:24:13 PM		1		
3490	WG	'Road access'	9/16/2002 1:24:13 PM		2		
3491	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:20 PM		1		
3492	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:20 PM		2		
3493		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:28 PM		4		
3494		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:28 PM		4		
3495		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:32 PM		4		
3496		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:32 PM		4		
3497		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:23 PM		4		
3498		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:23 PM		4		
3499	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:00 PM		4		
3500	nka	'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:00 PM		4		
3501		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:50 AM		4		
3502		'Lewis 18, 20 and 22 were rated by the workgroup.  Assumed the same as 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/24/2002 11:13:50 AM		4		
3503		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:06 PM		4		
3504		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:06 PM		4		
3505		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:19 PM		4		
3506		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:19 PM		4		
3507		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:04 PM		4		
3508		'Assumed similar to Lewis 18 based on confinement and gradient.'	9/19/2002 8:11:04 PM		4		
3509	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:38 AM		4		
3510	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:38 AM		4		
3511	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:08:09 PM		2		
3512	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 4:08:09 PM		2		
3513	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:45 PM		2		
3514	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:45 PM		2		
3515	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:50 PM		2		
3516	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:50 PM		2		
3517	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:41 PM		2		
3518	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:42:41 PM		2		
3519	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:49 AM		2		
3520	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:21:49 AM		2		
3521	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:14:26 AM		2		
3522	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:14:26 AM		2		
3523	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:42 AM		2		
3524	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:04:42 AM		3		
3525	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:30 AM		3		
3526	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:30 AM		4		
3527	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 9:00:24 AM		3		
3528	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 9:00:24 AM		4		
3529	WG	'Moderately confined.  Limited influx of groundwater is likely.'	9/17/2002 7:55:00 AM		3		
3530	WG	'Moderately confined.  Limited influx of groundwater is likely.'	9/17/2002 7:55:00 AM		3		
3531	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:45 PM		2		
3532	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:45 PM		4		
3533	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:37:02 AM		2		
3534	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:37:02 AM		3		
3535		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:35:38 PM		3		
3536		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:35:38 PM		4		
3537	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:35:32 PM		3		
3538	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:35:32 PM		4		
3539	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:31 PM		2		
3540	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:15:31 PM		4		
3541	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:34 PM		4		
3542	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:25:34 PM		4		
3543	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:45 AM		3		
3544	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 11:08:45 AM		3		
3545	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:23:10 AM		2		
3546	WG	'Rated the same as the reach description.'	9/17/2002 7:23:10 AM		2		
3547	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:40 PM		1		
3548	nka	'Measurements by Pacific Corp. in upper Lewis indicate D.O. levels consistently above 10.5mg/l in summer of 1994.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:00:40 PM		4		
3549	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:16:12 PM		3		
3550	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:16:12 PM		3		
3551	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:08:32 PM		4		
3552	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 24 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 23 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 21 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 18 Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC reports state that the hydro projects on the Lewis don?t affect the upper Lewis reaches'	8/29/2002 4:08:32 PM		4		
3553	NKA	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:52:36 PM		3		
3554	NKA	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:52:36 PM		3		
3555	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:54 AM		1		
3556	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  14 spp:  Those listed above and brook trout and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:36:54 AM		2		
3557	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:31:25 PM		1		
3558	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of rainbow trout annually into Swift Reservoir and potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:31:25 PM		2		
3559	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:38 PM		1		
3560	WG	'Brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:10:38 PM		2		
3561	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/30/2002 2:37:59 PM		2		
3562	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/30/2002 2:37:59 PM		3		
3563	WG	'Rating assigned by workgroup'	9/25/2002 9:07:00 AM		1		
3564	WG	'Rating assigned by workgroup'	9/25/2002 9:07:00 AM		2		
3565	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:26 PM		1		
3566	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 12:57:26 PM		2		
3567		'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:35 AM		3		
3568		'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:35 AM		4		
3569	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:53 AM		3		
3570	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:53 AM		4		
3571	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:21 AM		3		
3572	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:58:21 AM		4		
3573	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 10:56:28 AM		3		
3574	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools would be present and less riffles.'	9/18/2002 10:56:28 AM		4		
3575	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:59:03 AM		3		
3576	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.'	9/18/2002 10:59:03 AM		4		
3577	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 10:57:40 AM		3		
3578	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 10:57:40 AM		4		
3579		'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 10:58:05 AM		3		
3580		'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that pools and tailouts have decreased by 40% from historical conditions.'	9/18/2002 10:58:05 AM		4		
3581	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 10:57:09 AM		3		
3582	WG	'Patient based on field reconnaisance estimates by Dan Rawding.  Template assumes that more pools and more wood would help the reach hold spawning substrates.'	9/18/2002 10:57:09 AM		4		
3583	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:50 AM		4		
3584	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:40:50 AM		4		
3585	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/30/2002 2:37:14 PM		2		
3586	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/30/2002 2:37:14 PM		2		
3587	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:09 PM		2		
3588	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:09 PM		2		
3589	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:14 PM		2		
3590	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:14 PM		2		
3591	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:03 PM		2		
3592	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:43:03 PM		2		
3593	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:22:04 AM		2		
3594	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:22:04 AM		2		
3595	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:14:36 AM		2		
3596	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:14:36 AM		2		
3597	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:09:14 AM		2		
3598	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:09:14 AM		3		
3599	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:44 AM		2		
3600	nka	'Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:54:44 AM		4		
3601	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 9:00:43 AM		3		
3602	WG	'Assumed the same as Lewis 18.'	9/17/2002 9:00:43 AM		4		
3603	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:55:42 AM		3		
3604	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:55:42 AM		3		
3605	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:54 PM		2		
3606	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and statement in USFS watershed analysis that the mainstem is glacially influenced.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:37:54 PM		4		
3607	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:37:14 AM		2		
3608	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.  Patient is rated slightly higher because of logging and removal of wood from channel.'	9/17/2002 10:37:14 AM		3		
3609		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:36:58 PM		3		
3610		'Based on avg wetted widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:36:58 PM		4		
3611	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:36:53 PM		3		
3612	nka	'Based on avg active channel widths for entire NF Lewis presented in Pacific Corp FERC reports.'	8/30/2002 2:36:53 PM		4		
3613	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 10:57:46 AM		3		
3614	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 10:57:46 AM		4		
3615	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 10:57:46 AM		1		
3616	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 10:57:46 AM		4		
3617	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 11:35:32 AM		3		
3618	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 11:35:32 AM		4		
3619	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 11:35:32 AM		1		
3620	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 11:35:32 AM		4		
3621	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 2:17:08 PM		3		
3622	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 2:17:08 PM		4		
3623	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 2:17:08 PM		1		
3624	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 2:17:08 PM		4		
3625	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 2:54:21 PM		3		
3626	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 2:54:21 PM		4		
3627	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 2:54:21 PM		1		
3628	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 2:54:21 PM		4		
3629	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 6 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 3:53:53 PM		3		
3630	GB	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 6 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Database Test'	5/15/2001 3:53:53 PM		4		
3631	KM	'reach below Merwin Dam'	2/10/2003 9:09:04 PM		2		
3632	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 6 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 3:53:53 PM		1		
3633	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 6 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 5 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 4 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 2 tidal Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lewis 1 tidal Comments for reach are: Lewis Relicensing 2000 Technical Report Data'	5/15/2001 3:53:53 PM		4		
3634	WG	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents Alk of 15-20. Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:04:15 PM		1		
3635	WG	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents Alk of 15-20. Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:04:15 PM		4		
3636	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:20:16 PM		1		
3637	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:20:16 PM		4		
3638	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:17:41 PM		2		
3639	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:17:41 PM		2		
3640	nka	'reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:00:32 AM		4		
3641	nka	'reservoir has inundated the floodplain'	8/30/2002 11:00:32 AM		4		
3642	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - September. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:53:54 PM		1		
3643	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - September. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:53:54 PM		4		
3644	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:01 PM		3		
3645	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:01 PM		3		
3646	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 12:56:42 PM		3		
3647	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 12:56:42 PM		4		
3648	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:57:15 PM		1		
3649	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:57:15 PM		4		
3650	nka	'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 12:58:13 PM		4		
3651	nka	'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 12:58:13 PM		4		
3652	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:57:26 PM		1		
3653	nka	'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:57:26 PM		4		
3654	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:17 PM		3		
3655	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:17 PM		3		
3656	WG	'Template:  15 spp:  Northern pikeminnow, rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead, chum,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, sturgeon, chiselmouth.     Patient:  20 spp:  Those listed above and tiger musky, kokanee, brook trout, carp, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:16:55 AM		1		
3657	WG	'Template:  15 spp:  Northern pikeminnow, rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead, chum,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, sturgeon, chiselmouth.     Patient:  20 spp:  Those listed above and tiger musky, kokanee, brook trout, carp, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:16:55 AM		2		
3658	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee annually into Merwin Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:27:57 AM		1		
3659	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee annually into Merwin Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:27:57 AM		2		
3660	WG	'BROOK, BROWN, TIGER MUSKY, CARP, KOKANEE'	9/16/2002 4:02:11 PM		1		
3661	WG	'BROOK, BROWN, TIGER MUSKY, CARP, KOKANEE'	9/16/2002 4:02:11 PM		2		
3662	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 8.'	9/18/2002 2:56:24 PM		1		
3663	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 8.'	9/18/2002 2:56:24 PM		2		
3664	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:17 PM		1		
3665	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:17 PM		2		
3666	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:48:38 PM		1		
3667	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:48:38 PM		2		
3668	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:55 PM		1		
3669	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:55 PM		4		
3670	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:00:02 PM		1		
3671	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:00:02 PM		4		
3672	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:49 PM		1		
3673	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:49 PM		4		
3674	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:21 PM		1		
3675	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:21 PM		4		
3676	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:00:23 PM		4		
3677	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:00:23 PM		4		
3678	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:36 PM		1		
3679	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:36 PM		4		
3680	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:43 PM		1		
3681	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:43 PM		4		
3682	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:31 PM		1		
3683	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 12:59:31 PM		4		
3684	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:36:55 AM		1		
3685	WG	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:36:55 AM		2		
3686		'Western Cascades, low elevation'	8/29/2002 1:07:39 PM		3		
3687		'Western Cascades, low elevation'	8/29/2002 1:07:39 PM		3		
3688	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:24 PM		2		
3689	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:24 PM		2		
3690	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:29 PM		2		
3691	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:29 PM		2		
3692	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:04 PM		2		
3693	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:04 PM		2		
3694	nka	'Dams above and below reach'	8/30/2002 11:22:11 AM		1		
3695	nka	'Dams above and below reach'	8/30/2002 11:22:11 AM		4		
3696	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from tiger musky and northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:14:50 AM		2		
3697	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from tiger musky and northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:14:50 AM		2		
3698	NKA	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:18 AM		3		
3699	NKA	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:18 AM		4		
3700	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:52:52 AM		1		
3701	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:52:52 AM		3		
3702	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents temperature monitoring data through the winter of 99-00.  Min daily temp of 4.0 was recorded on 1/30/00.  Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:47:38 AM		1		
3703	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report documents temperature monitoring data through the winter of 99-00.  Min daily temp of 4.0 was recorded on 1/30/00.  Template:  Assumed the same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:47:38 AM		3		
3704	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents several days in October 1999 with a max temp of 15.5 degrees at the Merwin tailrace.  Temp monitor ran from 4/26/99-4/19/00.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:22 AM		1		
3705	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents several days in October 1999 with a max temp of 15.5 degrees at the Merwin tailrace.  Temp monitor ran from 4/26/99-4/19/00.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:22 AM		4		
3706	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:45:56 AM		3		
3707	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:45:56 AM		3		
3708	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 4NTU'	8/28/2002 1:28:13 PM		1		
3709	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 4NTU'	8/28/2002 1:28:13 PM		4		
3710	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:07 PM		3		
3711	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/18/2002 2:50:07 PM		3		
3712	WG	'Merwin hatchery withdraws from Merwin Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 1:34:27 PM		1		
3713	WG	'Merwin hatchery withdraws from Merwin Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 1:34:27 PM		2		
3714	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed 10ft narrower than Lewis 7.'	8/28/2002 12:48:25 PM		3		
3715	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed 10ft narrower than Lewis 7.'	8/28/2002 12:48:25 PM		4		
3716	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed 10ft narrower than Lewis 7.'	8/28/2002 12:48:48 PM		3		
3717	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed 10ft narrower than Lewis 7.'	8/28/2002 12:48:48 PM		4		
3718	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace. Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:04:44 PM		1		
3719	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents Alk of 15-24 at Yale tailrace. Listel recommends using value of 2 for westside streams'	9/16/2002 3:04:44 PM		4		
3720	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:20:47 PM		1		
3721	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Based on proffessional opinion by Kathy Dube'	9/17/2002 1:20:47 PM		4		
3722	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:06:57 AM		3		
3723	NKA	'Rating recommended by Kevin Malone because of reservoir substrate.'	9/19/2002 9:06:57 AM		4		
3724	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:20:10 PM		2		
3725	KM	'Topo shows mostly unconfined'	11/25/2002 2:20:10 PM		2		
3726	nka	'reservoir had inundated the flood plain'	8/30/2002 11:06:36 AM		1		
3727	nka	'reservoir had inundated the flood plain'	8/30/2002 11:06:36 AM		3		
3728	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:26 PM		1		
3729	NKA	'DO profile indicates DO is consistently above 8mg/l in June - December. (Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 1:57:26 PM		4		
3730	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:15 PM		3		
3731	WG	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:13:15 PM		3		
3732	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:02:50 PM		3		
3733	nka	'Reservoir:  assumed daily fluctuation was negligible'	8/29/2002 1:02:50 PM		4		
3734		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:05 PM		1		
3735		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:05 PM		4		
3736		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:09 PM		4		
3737		'Reservoir:  Flows modified by anthropogenic sources'	8/29/2002 1:05:09 PM		4		
3738		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:14 PM		1		
3739		'Reservoir: water level obviously higher than historical channel'	8/29/2002 12:59:14 PM		4		
3740		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:33 PM		3		
3741		'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Peterson et al. 1992 found fines to generally be 6-11% in unmanaged undisturbed watersheds.'	9/17/2002 4:07:33 PM		3		
3742	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:20:59 AM		1		
3743	WG	'Template:  12 spp:  rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, bull trout, coho, chinook, steelhead,  mountain whitefish, sucker, sculpin, dace, stickelback, chiselmouth.     Patient:  16 spp:  Those listed above and kokanee, brook trout, northern pikeminnow, and brown trout.'	9/16/2002 8:20:59 AM		2		
3744	NKA	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:15 AM		1		
3745	NKA	'Patient:  Rating based on the stocking of kokanee intermittently into Yale Reservoir.'	9/16/2002 11:33:15 AM		2		
3746	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:03:54 PM		1		
3747	WG	'brook, brown, northern pikeminnow, kokanee.  Historically, northern pikeminnow distribution ended at Speelyei Cr.'	9/16/2002 4:03:54 PM		2		
3748	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7'	11/25/2002 2:20:05 PM		1		
3749	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir  Template: Assumed similar to Lewis 7'	11/25/2002 2:20:05 PM		3		
3750	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:44 PM		1		
3751	WG	'Reservoir with boat access and roads'	9/16/2002 1:10:44 PM		2		
3752	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:49:06 PM		1		
3753	WG	'Potential exists for potential competition between coho and chinook and hatchery kokanee.'	9/16/2002 12:49:06 PM		2		
3754	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:02:09 PM		1		
3755	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:02:09 PM		4		
3756	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:02:16 PM		1		
3757	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:02:16 PM		4		
3758	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:55 PM		1		
3759	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:55 PM		4		
3760	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:27 PM		1		
3761	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:27 PM		4		
3762	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches. Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:26:06 AM		4		
3763	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches. Kevin Edited to a value of 2 based on topo maps of area.'	11/25/2002 10:26:06 AM		4		
3764	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:42 PM		1		
3765	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:42 PM		4		
3766	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:49 PM		1		
3767	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:49 PM		4		
3768	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:33 PM		1		
3769	NKA	'Patient:  Reservoir.  Template:  Assumed that habitat would be similar to an average of template values for Lewis 20 and Lewis 27.  Gradient, LWD, and confinement are similar between these reaches.'	9/24/2002 1:01:33 PM		4		
3770	nka	'Glacial rating assigned by workgroup based on observation, flow regimes, and turbidity.'	9/25/2002 8:37:09 AM		4		
3771	nka	'western cascade stream'	8/30/2002 11:08:03 AM		3		
3772	nka	'western cascade stream'	8/30/2002 11:08:03 AM		3		
3773	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:53 PM		2		
3774	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:53 PM		2		
3775	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:57 PM		2		
3776	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:57 PM		2		
3777	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:48 PM		2		
3778	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:35:48 PM		2		
3779	nka	'dam at bottom of reach'	9/19/2002 6:53:06 PM		1		
3780	nka	'dam at bottom of reach'	9/19/2002 6:53:06 PM		4		
3781	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:15:42 AM		2		
3782	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.  Predation comes primarily from northern pikeminnow.'	9/16/2002 10:15:42 AM		2		
3783	NKA	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:32 AM		3		
3784	NKA	'Rating recommened by Kevin Malone for reservoir at full pool.'	9/19/2002 9:02:32 AM		4		
3785	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:15 AM		1		
3786	WG	'Patient: Little to no spawing in the reservoirs.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 10:53:15 AM		3		
3787	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps of 4.5 degrees in February of 2000 at Yale tailrace.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:46:17 AM		1		
3788	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps of 4.5 degrees in February of 2000 at Yale tailrace.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 17.'	9/17/2002 9:46:17 AM		3		
3789	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports documents 6 days at Yale tailrace with temps of 16 or greater.  Max of 17.0 recorded on 8/28 and 8/29.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:35 AM		1		
3790	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports documents 6 days at Yale tailrace with temps of 16 or greater.  Max of 17.0 recorded on 8/28 and 8/29.  Template:  Assumed same as Lewis 18.'	9/25/2002 8:48:35 AM		4		
3791	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:20 AM		3		
3792	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 7:46:20 AM		3		
3793	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:10:23 PM		1		
3794	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents levels consistently below 6NTU in Yale Reservoir'	8/28/2002 2:10:23 PM		4		
3795	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/26/2002 10:34:19 AM		3		
3796	WG	'Template:  Only assigned a rating of 2 because of the reach confinement and description of the middle Lewis reaches as "transport reaches."  Reach doesn't have the capacity to hold much LWD.'	9/26/2002 10:34:19 AM		3		
3797	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:20:04 PM		3		
3798	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:20:04 PM		4		
3799	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:20:00 PM		3		
3800	NKA	'Patient:  Used map to estimate average width of reservoir.    Template:  Assumed slightly narrower than downstream reach.'	8/28/2002 2:20:00 PM		4		
3801	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:20 PM		2		
3802	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:20 PM		4		
3803	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:55 PM		4		
3804	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:30:55 PM		4		
3805	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:41:23 AM		3		
3806	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:41:23 AM		3		
3807	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Little Cr. as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/18/2002 8:37:35 AM		3		
3808	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Little Cr. as a Rosgen A channel.'	9/18/2002 8:37:35 AM		3		
3809	nka	'Maps show little to no road influence in this reach'	9/2/2002 9:16:28 AM		1		
3810	nka	'Maps show little to no road influence in this reach'	9/2/2002 9:16:28 AM		3		
3811	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Little Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:10:05 PM		2		
3812	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Little Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:10:05 PM		4		
3813	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:18:10 PM		3		
3814	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:18:10 PM		3		
3815	NKA	'USFS documents that the stream flows through a wetland meadow, and likely has groundwater sources.'	8/28/2002 10:41:16 AM		2		
3816	NKA	'USFS documents that the stream flows through a wetland meadow, and likely has groundwater sources.'	8/28/2002 10:41:16 AM		3		
3817	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:54:34 PM		3		
3818	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:54:34 PM		3		
3819	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:16:05 AM		2		
3820	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:16:05 AM		2		
3821	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:38:11 PM		2		
3822	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:38:11 PM		2		
3823	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 12:55:43 PM		1		
3824	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 12:55:43 PM		2		
3825	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:01:29 PM		2		
3826	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:01:29 PM		2		
3827	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:32 PM		3		
3828	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:32 PM		3		
3829	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:38 PM		3		
3830	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:38 PM		4		
3831	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:28 PM		3		
3832	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:28 PM		3		
3833	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  Had to make an exemption in this reach because the increase in pools caused a decrease in riffles to below 0%.  Assumed large subst riffles went to 5%, and rest of decrement went to small subst riffles.'	9/19/2002 1:50:04 PM		3		
3834	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  Had to make an exemption in this reach because the increase in pools caused a decrease in riffles to below 0%.  Assumed large subst riffles went to 5%, and rest of decrement went to small subst riffles.'	9/19/2002 1:50:04 PM		3		
3835	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:15:31 AM		4		
3836	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:15:31 AM		4		
3837	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:20 PM		3		
3838	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:20 PM		3		
3839	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:24 PM		3		
3840	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:50:24 PM		3		
3841	NKA	'USFS reports riffles, but mostly sand and silt dominated'	8/27/2002 12:52:38 PM		3		
3842	NKA	'USFS reports riffles, but mostly sand and silt dominated'	8/27/2002 12:52:38 PM		3		
3843	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:08:23 AM		3		
3844	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:08:23 AM		3		
3845	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/27/2002 12:49:59 PM		2		
3846	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/27/2002 12:49:59 PM		2		
3847	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:41 PM		3		
3848	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:41 PM		3		
3849	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:46 PM		3		
3850	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:46 PM		3		
3851	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:34 PM		3		
3852	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:47:34 PM		3		
3853	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:50:47 PM		1		
3854	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:50:47 PM		3		
3855	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:27:33 AM		2		
3856	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:27:33 AM		2		
3857	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:20:13 AM		2		
3858	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:20:13 AM		2		
3859	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:14:42 AM		2		
3860	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:14:42 AM		3		
3861	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents temperatures recorded between 8/6/94 and 1/4/95.  Min daily temp was 3.4 in January.'	9/17/2002 10:01:13 AM		2		
3862	NKA	'Pacific Corp Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents temperatures recorded between 8/6/94 and 1/4/95.  Min daily temp was 3.4 in January.'	9/17/2002 10:01:13 AM		3		
3863	NKA	'Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study (1995) reports temperature data monitored from 8/6/94 - 1/4/95.  Max temp of 7.4 occurred on several days in August.'	9/17/2002 9:11:48 AM		2		
3864	NKA	'Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study (1995) reports temperature data monitored from 8/6/94 - 1/4/95.  Max temp of 7.4 occurred on several days in August.'	9/17/2002 9:11:48 AM		3		
3865	NKA	'USFS indicates the stream is spring fed.  FERC report low summer temps (less than Cougar) indicating spring fed.'	9/19/2002 3:54:57 PM		2		
3866	NKA	'USFS indicates the stream is spring fed.  FERC report low summer temps (less than Cougar) indicating spring fed.'	9/19/2002 3:54:57 PM		3		
3867	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.'	9/26/2002 9:20:34 AM		3		
3868	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.'	9/26/2002 9:20:34 AM		4		
3869	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 32 pieces/mile in Little Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:12:54 PM		3		
3870	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 32 pieces/mile in Little Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:12:54 PM		3		
3871	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 12:47:09 PM		1		
3872	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	8/27/2002 12:47:09 PM		3		
3873	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:55:58 PM		3		
3874	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:55:58 PM		4		
3875	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/25/2001 4:46:56 PM		4		
3876	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/25/2001 4:46:56 PM		4		
3877	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3878	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3879	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3880	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3881	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3882	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3883	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies M14 as Rosgen B.'	9/20/2002 12:52:48 PM		3		
3884	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies M14 as Rosgen B.'	9/20/2002 12:52:48 PM		3		
3885		''	9/20/2002 12:53:32 PM		4		
3886		''	9/20/2002 12:53:32 PM		4		
3887	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3888	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3889	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3890	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3891	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3892	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3893	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3894	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3895	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3896	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3897	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		1		
3898	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3899	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3900	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3901	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3902	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3903	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3904	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3905	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3906	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3907	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3908	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3909	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:45:49 AM		4		
3910	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:45:49 AM		4		
3911	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3912	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3913	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3914	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3915	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3916	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3917	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:43:11 AM		3		
3918	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 8:43:11 AM		3		
3919	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3920	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3921	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3922	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3923	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3924	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3925	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3926	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3927	NKA	'No barriers recorded in Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:52:17 PM		1		
3928	NKA	'No barriers recorded in Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:52:17 PM		2		
3929	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3930	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		2		
3931	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:58:11 AM		4		
3932	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 9:58:11 AM		4		
3933	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:42 AM		3		
3934	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:42 AM		3		
3935	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3936	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3937	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3938	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3939	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 12:53:18 PM		3		
3940	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 12:53:18 PM		3		
3941	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:57:39 AM		4		
3942	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:57:39 AM		4		
3943	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3944	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		4		
3945	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		1		
3946	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are:  USFS Stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3947	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		1		
3948	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:19:07 AM		3		
3949	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3950	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3951	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3952	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3953	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3954	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3955	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3956	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3957	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3958	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3959	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3960	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3961	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3962	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3963	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3964	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3965	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3966	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3967	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3968	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3969	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3970	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3971	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3972	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3973	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		1		
3974	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3975	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3976	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3977	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3978	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
3979	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3980	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3981	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3982	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3983	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3984	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3985	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3986	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3987	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3988	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3989	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3990	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3991	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3992	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3993	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3994	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
3995	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3996	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3997	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3998	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
3999	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4000	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4001	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4002	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4003	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4004	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4005	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4006	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4007	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4008	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4009	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4010	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4011	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4012	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4013	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4014	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4015	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4016	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4017	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4018	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4019	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4020	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4021	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4022	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		3		
4023		''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		1		
4024		''	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4025	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4026	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
4027	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		2		
4028	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:51:19 AM		4		
4029	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 10:37:44 AM		4		
4030	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 10:37:44 AM		4		
4031	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:29 PM		3		
4032	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:29 PM		3		
4033	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:31:09 PM		4		
4034	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:31:09 PM		4		
4035	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:46:27 AM		3		
4036	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:46:27 AM		3		
4037	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls Marble Cr. a Rosgen type A.'	9/18/2002 8:57:56 AM		3		
4038	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls Marble Cr. a Rosgen type A.'	9/18/2002 8:57:56 AM		3		
4039		'Map shows there may be some influence from roads'	8/30/2002 4:28:23 PM		3		
4040		'Map shows there may be some influence from roads'	8/30/2002 4:28:23 PM		4		
4041	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:05:40 PM		3		
4042	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:05:40 PM		3		
4043	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift.'	9/19/2002 6:35:03 PM		4		
4044	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift.'	9/19/2002 6:35:03 PM		4		
4045	NKA	'Small stream likely subject to flow fluctuations from moderate freshets'	8/29/2002 2:58:46 PM		3		
4046	NKA	'Small stream likely subject to flow fluctuations from moderate freshets'	8/29/2002 2:58:46 PM		4		
4047	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift.'	9/19/2002 6:34:53 PM		4		
4048	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift.'	9/19/2002 6:34:53 PM		4		
4049	nka	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:27:58 AM		2		
4050	nka	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:27:58 AM		2		
4051	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:38:26 PM		2		
4052	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:38:26 PM		2		
4053	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:51:01 PM		2		
4054	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:51:01 PM		3		
4055	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:01:40 PM		2		
4056	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:01:40 PM		2		
4057		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:59 PM		4		
4058		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:59 PM		4		
4059		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:47:02 PM		4		
4060		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:47:02 PM		4		
4061		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:56 PM		4		
4062		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:56 PM		4		
4063	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:38 PM		4		
4064	NKA	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:38 PM		4		
67	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 3:55:21 PM		4		
68	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 3:55:21 PM		4		
69	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  Kinney and Lampo document 10 pieces/mile. These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/26/2002 7:52:03 AM		3		
70	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  Kinney and Lampo document 10 pieces/mile. These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/26/2002 7:52:03 AM		4		
71	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:44:48 AM		1		
72	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:44:48 AM		4		
73	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:02:09 PM		3		
74	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 1:02:09 PM		4		
75	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
76	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
77	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
78	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		4		
79	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
80	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
81	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC classifies as Rosgen Type A.'	9/20/2002 12:46:15 PM		3		
82	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC classifies as Rosgen Type A.'	9/20/2002 12:46:15 PM		3		
83	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:19:56 AM		3		
20	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		2		
21	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: none reported in USFS reports'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
22	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: none reported in USFS reports'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		2		
4066	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:16:13 AM		4		
4065	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:16:13 AM		4		
4087	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:20:25 AM		3		
4088	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:20:25 AM		3		
4089	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:01:41 AM		2		
4090	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:01:41 AM		3		
4091	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:30:37 PM		3		
4092	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:30:37 PM		4		
4093	NKA	'Cloned from Drift'	9/19/2002 6:19:45 PM		4		
4094	NKA	'Cloned from Drift'	9/19/2002 6:19:45 PM		4		
4095	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:03:54 AM		3		
4096	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:03:54 AM		3		
4097	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:52:32 PM		4		
4098	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:52:32 PM		4		
4099	NKA	'No data for Marble Cr., but there is only 40ft of accessible habitat.'	9/17/2002 12:59:02 PM		4		
4100	NKA	'No data for Marble Cr., but there is only 40ft of accessible habitat.'	9/17/2002 12:59:02 PM		4		
4101	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 1:34:57 PM		1		
4102	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 1:34:57 PM		3		
4103	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 1:34:45 PM		1		
4104	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	8/27/2002 1:34:45 PM		3		
4105	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4106	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4107	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4108	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4109	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4110	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4111	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4112	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4113	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4114	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4115	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4116	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4117	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:32:06 AM		3		
4118	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:32:06 AM		3		
4119	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4120	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4121		''	2/11/2003 8:13:46 AM		3		
4122		''	2/11/2003 8:13:46 AM		4		
4123	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:31:58 AM		3		
4124	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:31:58 AM		4		
4125	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4126	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4127	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4128	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4129	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4130	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4131	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		1		
4132	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4133	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4134	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4135	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4136	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4137	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4138	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4139	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4140	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4141	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4142	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4143	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4144	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4145	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4146	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4147	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4148	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4149	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4150	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4151	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4152	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		4		
4153	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4154	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4155	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4156	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4157	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4158	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4159	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4160	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4161	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4162	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4163	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4164	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4165	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4166	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4167	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4168	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4169	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4170	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4171	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4172	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4173	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4174	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4175	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4176	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4177	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4178	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4179	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4180	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		3		
4181		''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		1		
4182		''	2/11/2003 7:50:58 AM		2		
4183	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:12:58 AM		2		
4184	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:12:58 AM		4		
4185	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:12:51 AM		2		
4186	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:12:51 AM		4		
4187	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 8:43:57 AM		4		
4188	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 8:43:57 AM		4		
4189	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:34 AM		3		
4190	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:34 AM		4		
4191	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:39:25 AM		4		
4192	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:39:25 AM		4		
4193	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4194	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4195	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:39:07 AM		3		
4196	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:39:07 AM		3		
4197	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4198	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4199	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:38 AM		3		
4200	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:38 AM		4		
4201	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:12 AM		3		
4202	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:12 AM		3		
4203	KM	'No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:42:05 AM		3		
4204	KM	'No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:42:05 AM		3		
4205	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:18:36 AM		3		
4206	WG	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:18:36 AM		4		
4207	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4208	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4209	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4210	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4211	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4212	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4213	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:38:45 AM		1		
4214	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:38:45 AM		2		
4215	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4216	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4217	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4218	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4219	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:12 AM		3		
4220	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:12 AM		4		
4221	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:35:54 AM		3		
4222	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:35:54 AM		4		
4223	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:34:34 AM		3		
4224	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:34:34 AM		4		
4225	WG	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:37:00 AM		3		
4226	WG	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:37:00 AM		4		
4227	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:35:34 AM		4		
4228	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:35:34 AM		4		
4229	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:48 AM		3		
4230	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:48 AM		4		
4231	WG	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:25 AM		3		
4232	WG	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:25 AM		4		
4233	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:53 AM		3		
4234	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:36:53 AM		4		
4235	KM	'Similar for other Merwin tribs'	2/11/2003 7:55:03 AM		3		
4236	KM	'Similar for other Merwin tribs'	2/11/2003 7:55:03 AM		3		
4237	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:32:56 AM		3		
4238	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:32:56 AM		3		
4239	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:00 AM		3		
4240	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:00 AM		3		
4241	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:00 AM		3		
4242	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:44:00 AM		3		
4243	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:45:16 AM		3		
4244	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:45:16 AM		3		
4245	NKA	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:40:48 AM		2		
4246	NKA	'Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:40:48 AM		2		
4247	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4248	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4249	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4250	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4251	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4252	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4253	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:47 AM		3		
4254	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:47 AM		3		
4255	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:16 AM		3		
4256	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:16 AM		3		
4257	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:59 AM		3		
4258	KM	'Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:31:59 AM		3		
4259	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:43:24 AM		3		
4260	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:43:24 AM		3		
4261	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4262	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		3		
4263		''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		1		
4264		''	2/11/2003 7:28:12 AM		2		
4265	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.  Assumed that Clear Creek representative of small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:23:29 AM		2		
4266	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.  Assumed that Clear Creek representative of small tribs'	2/11/2003 9:23:29 AM		4		
4267	KM	'For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 9:23:07 AM		2		
4268	KM	'For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 9:23:07 AM		4		
4269	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Manley Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 11:29:21 AM		4		
4270	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Manley Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Mason Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Lockwood Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brezee Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/29/2001 11:29:21 AM		4		
4271	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:41 PM		3		
4272	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:41 PM		4		
4273	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:31:41 PM		4		
4274	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:31:41 PM		4		
4275	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:12 AM		3		
4276	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:12 AM		3		
4277	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen B/C.'	9/18/2002 8:45:27 AM		3		
4278	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen B/C.'	9/18/2002 8:45:27 AM		3		
4279	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:18 PM		3		
4280	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:18 PM		4		
4281	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:18 PM		3		
4282	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:18 PM		4		
4283	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamaker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	2/10/2003 9:21:05 PM		3		
4284	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamaker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	2/10/2003 9:21:05 PM		3		
4285	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:16:40 AM		3		
4286	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:16:40 AM		3		
4287	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:14 PM		1		
4288	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:14 PM		2		
4289		'USFS doesn't document non-natives in stream survey reports'	8/30/2002 4:46:20 PM		3		
4290		'USFS doesn't document non-natives in stream survey reports'	8/30/2002 4:46:20 PM		3		
4291	KM	'Data from Topo Map'	11/25/2002 6:39:49 PM		1		
4292	KM	'Data from Topo Map'	11/25/2002 6:39:49 PM		3		
4293		''	9/16/2002 1:30:10 PM		1		
4294		''	9/16/2002 1:30:10 PM		2		
4295	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 7:59:44 AM		1		
4296	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 7:59:44 AM		2		
4297	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:26 PM		3		
4298	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:26 PM		3		
4299	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:22 PM		3		
4300	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:22 PM		3		
4301	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:29 PM		3		
4302	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:29 PM		3		
4303	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:05:50 PM		3		
4304	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:05:50 PM		3		
4305	KM	'Changed Template (30%) based on gradient and Topo maps showing excessive braiding throughout Muddy Fork in Patient.  Assumed wood would increase off-channel habitat.'	2/10/2003 9:16:16 PM		4		
4306	KM	'Changed Template (30%) based on gradient and Topo maps showing excessive braiding throughout Muddy Fork in Patient.  Assumed wood would increase off-channel habitat.'	2/10/2003 9:16:16 PM		4		
4307	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:35 PM		3		
4308	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:35 PM		3		
4309	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:33 PM		3		
4310	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:06:33 PM		3		
4311	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:05:38 PM		3		
4312	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:05:38 PM		3		
4313	NKA	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:54:49 AM		3		
4314	NKA	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:54:49 AM		3		
4315	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 3:02:36 PM		3		
4316	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 3:02:36 PM		3		
4317	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:37 PM		3		
4318	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:37 PM		3		
4319	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:41 PM		3		
4320	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:41 PM		3		
4321	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:32 PM		3		
4322	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:32 PM		3		
4323	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:30 PM		2		
4324	NKA	'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:30 PM		2		
4325	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:21 AM		2		
4326	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:21 AM		2		
4327	NKA	'Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:20:49 AM		2		
4328	NKA	'Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:20:49 AM		2		
4329	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:15:36 AM		2		
4330	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:15:36 AM		3		
4331	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:44 PM		3		
4332	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:44 PM		4		
4333	NKA	'USFS data says that in a temp monitor in the Muddy River below Clear Cr., in 2000, temps exceeded 16 degrees 64 days, and the maximum recorded temp was 21.5 degrees.  Template:  USFS Muddy River watershed analysis says that prior to eruption of St. Helens, Muddy river exceeded a daily max of 16 degrees sixteen times a year.  In six years after the eruption it has averaged 52 exceedences per year.'	9/18/2002 2:00:36 PM		2		
4334	NKA	'USFS data says that in a temp monitor in the Muddy River below Clear Cr., in 2000, temps exceeded 16 degrees 64 days, and the maximum recorded temp was 21.5 degrees.  Template:  USFS Muddy River watershed analysis says that prior to eruption of St. Helens, Muddy river exceeded a daily max of 16 degrees sixteen times a year.  In six years after the eruption it has averaged 52 exceedences per year.'	9/18/2002 2:00:36 PM		3		
4335	NKA	'Mostly confined channel type unlikely to have significant sources of groundwater.  High temps in Muddy indicate little groundwater influence.'	9/18/2002 8:54:02 AM		3		
4336	NKA	'Mostly confined channel type unlikely to have significant sources of groundwater.  High temps in Muddy indicate little groundwater influence.'	9/18/2002 8:54:02 AM		3		
4337	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:58:40 PM		3		
4338	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:58:40 PM		4		
4339	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:15:21 PM		2		
4340	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:15:21 PM		3		
4341	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 2:58:47 PM		1		
4342	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 2:58:47 PM		4		
4343	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 2:58:39 PM		1		
4344	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 2:58:39 PM		4		
4345	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:50 PM		2		
4346	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:17:50 PM		4		
4347	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:02 PM		4		
4348	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:02 PM		4		
4349	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:24 AM		3		
4350	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:24 AM		3		
4351	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen D.'	9/18/2002 8:46:26 AM		3		
4352	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen D.'	9/18/2002 8:46:26 AM		3		
4353	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:57:05 PM		3		
4354	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:57:05 PM		3		
4355	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:24 PM		1		
4356	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:24 PM		4		
4357	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:28 PM		3		
4358	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:28 PM		4		
4359	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:40:54 PM		3		
4360	NKA	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:40:54 PM		3		
4361	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:04 AM		2		
4362	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:04 AM		2		
4363	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:21 PM		1		
4364	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:21 PM		2		
4365	KM	'From Topo'	11/25/2002 6:40:26 PM		1		
4366	KM	'From Topo'	11/25/2002 6:40:26 PM		3		
4367	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:02 AM		1		
4368	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:02 AM		2		
4369	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:37 PM		3		
4370	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:37 PM		3		
4371	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:41 PM		3		
4372	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:41 PM		3		
4373	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:33 PM		3		
4374	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:33 PM		3		
4375	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:12 PM		3		
4376	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:12 PM		3		
4377	KM	'See comment for Muddy R 1'	2/10/2003 9:16:45 PM		4		
4378	KM	'See comment for Muddy R 1'	2/10/2003 9:16:45 PM		4		
4379	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:21 PM		3		
4380	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:21 PM		3		
4381	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:29 PM		3		
4382	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:29 PM		3		
4383	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:17 PM		3		
4384	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:18:17 PM		3		
4385	WG	'Professional opinion of workgroup, old gage data supports assertion.'	2/10/2003 9:17:16 PM		3		
4386	WG	'Professional opinion of workgroup, old gage data supports assertion.'	2/10/2003 9:17:16 PM		3		
4387	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 3:38:48 PM		3		
4388	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 3:38:48 PM		3		
4389	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:00 PM		2		
4390	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:00 PM		2		
4391	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:04 PM		2		
4392	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:04 PM		2		
4393	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:56 PM		2		
4394	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:56 PM		2		
4395		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:40 PM		2		
4396		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:40 PM		2		
4397	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:34 AM		2		
4398	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:34 AM		2		
4399	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:20:59 AM		2		
4400	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:20:59 AM		2		
4401	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:15:53 AM		2		
4402	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:15:53 AM		3		
4403	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:56 PM		3		
4404	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:56 PM		4		
4405	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:41:32 PM		2		
4406	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:41:32 PM		3		
4407	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:52:58 AM		4		
4408	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:52:58 AM		4		
4409	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:58:54 PM		3		
4410	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:58:54 PM		4		
4411	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:15:56 PM		2		
4412	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:15:56 PM		3		
4413	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 3:41:23 PM		1		
4414	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 3:41:23 PM		4		
4415	NKA	'USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 3:41:15 PM		1		
4416	NKA	'USFS stream survey report  Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 3:41:15 PM		4		
4417	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:00 PM		3		
4418	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:00 PM		4		
4419	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:19 PM		4		
4420	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:19 PM		4		
4421	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:35 AM		3		
4422	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:35 AM		3		
4423	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen D.'	9/18/2002 8:46:14 AM		3		
4424	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls lower Muddy a Rosgen D.'	9/18/2002 8:46:14 AM		3		
4425	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:56:30 PM		3		
4426	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:56:30 PM		4		
4427	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:32 PM		3		
4428	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:32 PM		4		
4429	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:46 PM		3		
4430	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:46 PM		4		
4431	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:40 PM		3		
4432	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:40 PM		3		
4433	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:30 AM		2		
4434	NKA	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:30 AM		2		
4435	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:38 PM		1		
4436	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:38 PM		2		
4437	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:17:47 PM		1		
4438	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:17:47 PM		3		
4439	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:10 AM		1		
4440	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:10 AM		2		
4441	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:53 PM		3		
4442	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:53 PM		3		
4443	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:28:02 PM		3		
4444	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:28:02 PM		3		
4445	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:47 PM		3		
4446	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:47 PM		3		
4447	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:29 PM		3		
4448	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:29 PM		3		
4449	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Rating for this reach increased slightly because of confinement.'	9/24/2002 10:20:32 AM		4		
4450	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Rating for this reach increased slightly because of confinement.'	9/24/2002 10:20:32 AM		4		
4451	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:38 PM		3		
4452	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:38 PM		3		
4453	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:43 PM		3		
4454	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:43 PM		3		
4455	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:34 PM		3		
4456	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:27:34 PM		3		
4457	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:55:12 AM		3		
4458	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:55:12 AM		3		
4459	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 4:04:13 PM		3		
4460	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 4:04:13 PM		3		
4461	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:26 PM		3		
4462	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:26 PM		3		
4463	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:31 PM		3		
4464	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:31 PM		3		
4465	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:21 PM		3		
4466	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:21 PM		3		
4467		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:49 PM		2		
4468		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:46:49 PM		2		
4469	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:48 AM		2		
4470	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:48 AM		2		
4471	NKA	'Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:21:16 AM		3		
4472	NKA	'Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:21:16 AM		3		
4473	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:16:11 AM		2		
4474	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:16:11 AM		3		
4475	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:11 PM		3		
4476	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:11 PM		4		
4477	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:48:34 PM		3		
4478	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:48:34 PM		4		
4479	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:53:13 AM		3		
4480	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:53:13 AM		3		
4481	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:59:03 PM		3		
4482	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:59:03 PM		4		
4483	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:16:12 PM		3		
4484	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:16:12 PM		3		
4485	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report data Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 4:02:13 PM		1		
4486	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report data Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	8/26/2002 4:02:13 PM		4		
4487	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Template:  Assumed narrower prior to St. Helens eruption'	9/25/2002 12:58:20 PM		3		
4488	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Template:  Assumed narrower prior to St. Helens eruption'	9/25/2002 12:58:20 PM		4		
4489	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:08 PM		2		
4490	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:08 PM		4		
4491	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:39 PM		4		
4492	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:39 PM		4		
4493	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:46 AM		3		
4494	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:42:46 AM		3		
4495	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls upper Muddy a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:22:05 AM		3		
4496	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map calls upper Muddy a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:22:05 AM		3		
4497	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:58:20 PM		3		
4498	nka	'Map shows possible influence from road'	8/30/2002 4:58:20 PM		4		
4499	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:42 PM		2		
4500	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Muddy River show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:11:42 PM		4		
4501	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:42:02 PM		3		
4502	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:42:02 PM		4		
4503	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:56 PM		3		
4504	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:41:56 PM		3		
4505	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:54 AM		2		
4506	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:17:54 AM		2		
4507	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:53 PM		1		
4508	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential plan to outplant hatchery salmon. No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:40:53 PM		2		
4509	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:18:42 PM		1		
4510	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:18:42 PM		3		
4511	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:19 AM		1		
4512	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis and Muddy of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/18/2002 8:00:19 AM		2		
4513	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:26 PM		3		
4514	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:26 PM		3		
4515	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:31 PM		3		
4516	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:31 PM		3		
4517	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:22 PM		3		
4518	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:22 PM		3		
4519	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:05 PM		3		
4520	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:05 PM		3		
4521	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	2/10/2003 9:06:32 PM		4		
4522	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	2/10/2003 9:06:32 PM		4		
4523	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:14 PM		3		
4524	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:14 PM		3		
4525	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:18 PM		3		
4526	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:18 PM		3		
4527	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:10 PM		3		
4528	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 1:30:10 PM		3		
4529	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:55:24 AM		3		
4530	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:55:24 AM		3		
4531	KM	'No hydroeletric Project In reach'	2/10/2003 9:07:00 PM		1		
4532	KM	'No hydroeletric Project In reach'	2/10/2003 9:07:00 PM		1		
4533	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 4:27:33 PM		3		
4534	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Muddy R 1 Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 4:27:33 PM		3		
4535	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:49 PM		3		
4536	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:49 PM		3		
4537	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:55 PM		3		
4538	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:55 PM		3		
4539	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:45 PM		3		
4540	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:49:45 PM		3		
4541	NKA	'20 FT falls 13.7 miles up from the mouth.'	9/19/2002 6:47:30 PM		2		
4542	NKA	'20 FT falls 13.7 miles up from the mouth.'	9/19/2002 6:47:30 PM		2		
4543	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:07 AM		2		
4544	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:07 AM		2		
4545	WG	' Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:21:29 AM		3		
4546	WG	' Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report)'	9/17/2002 10:21:29 AM		3		
4547	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:16:32 AM		2		
4548	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:16:32 AM		3		
4549	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:23 PM		4		
4550	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:23 PM		4		
4551	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:48:47 PM		4		
4552	NKA	'USFS 2000 Water Quality monitoring report documents temps exceeded 16 degrees 344 times over a 6 year span (57 times/yr).  The max temp recorded on any one day over the same six years was 24.4.  Temp monitor was above Clear Cr.'	9/17/2002 4:48:47 PM		4		
4553	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have groundwater sources.'	9/18/2002 8:54:37 AM		3		
4554	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have groundwater sources.'	9/18/2002 8:54:37 AM		3		
4555	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:59:12 PM		3		
4556	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging, roads and St. Helens eruption.'	9/16/2002 3:59:12 PM		4		
4557	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:16:24 PM		3		
4558	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 7 pieces/mile in Muddy River. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:16:24 PM		3		
4559	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report data Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	9/20/2002 5:01:03 PM		1		
4560	NKA	'Patient:  USFS stream survey report data Template:  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows scoured much of the basin and widend channels'	9/20/2002 5:01:03 PM		4		
4561	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Template:  Assumed narrower prior to St. Helens eruption'	9/25/2002 12:59:01 PM		3		
4562	NKA	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Template:  Assumed narrower prior to St. Helens eruption'	9/25/2002 12:59:01 PM		4		
4563	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 1 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 4:05:17 PM		4		
4564	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chelatchie Cr 1 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Bitter Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Brush Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: John Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 4:05:17 PM		4		
4565	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:39 PM		3		
4566	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:39 PM		4		
4567	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4568	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4569	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4570	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4571	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies it as a Rosgen B.'	9/24/2002 10:31:24 AM		1		
4572	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies it as a Rosgen B.'	9/24/2002 10:31:24 AM		2		
4573	NKA	'No roads shown near NF Siouxon in Gazeteer.'	9/25/2002 1:21:23 PM		2		
4574	NKA	'No roads shown near NF Siouxon in Gazeteer.'	9/25/2002 1:21:23 PM		2		
4575	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:27:18 PM		1		
4576	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:27:18 PM		4		
4577	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4578	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4579	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).  Used road density for NF Siouxon subbasin.'	9/26/2002 7:45:54 AM		3		
4580	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).  Used road density for NF Siouxon subbasin.'	9/26/2002 7:45:54 AM		3		
4581	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:31:24 PM		2		
4582	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:31:24 PM		2		
4583	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		1		
4584	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4585	WG	''	9/25/2002 1:31:29 PM		2		
4586	WG	''	9/25/2002 1:31:29 PM		2		
4587	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/24/2002 10:30:18 AM		2		
4588	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/24/2002 10:30:18 AM		3		
4589	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		1		
4590	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4591	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4592	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4593	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4594	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4595	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4596	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4597	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:31:46 AM		4		
4598	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:31:46 AM		4		
4599	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4600	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4601	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4602	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		4		
4603	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4604	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4605	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4606	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4607	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4608	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4609	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4610	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4611	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4612	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4613	NKA	'15-20 foot falls at upstream end of reach (RM 2.1)'	9/25/2002 1:24:22 PM		1		
4614	NKA	'15-20 foot falls at upstream end of reach (RM 2.1)'	9/25/2002 1:24:22 PM		2		
4615	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4616	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4617	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	12/9/2002 2:20:16 PM		2		
4618	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	12/9/2002 2:20:16 PM		2		
4619	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		2		
4620	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4621	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:34 PM		3		
4622	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:34 PM		4		
4623	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Siouxon 2.'	9/25/2002 1:43:14 PM		3		
4624	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Siouxon 2.'	9/25/2002 1:43:14 PM		3		
4625	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:24 PM		3		
4626	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:24 PM		3		
4627	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered against increased turbidity from logging and roads.'	9/25/2002 1:36:38 PM		3		
4628	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered against increased turbidity from logging and roads.'	9/25/2002 1:36:38 PM		3		
4629	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 12 pieces/mile in Drift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4630	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 12 pieces/mile in Drift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 3:13:35 PM		3		
4631	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report..'	9/26/2002 7:29:15 AM		3		
4632	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report..'	9/26/2002 7:29:15 AM		4		
4633	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report..'	9/26/2002 7:29:12 AM		3		
4634	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report..'	9/26/2002 7:29:12 AM		4		
4635	NKA	''	9/20/2002 3:31:44 PM		2		
4636	NKA	''	9/20/2002 3:31:44 PM		4		
4637	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4638	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4639	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4640	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4641	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosge A/B.'	9/20/2002 3:20:18 PM		2		
4642	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosge A/B.'	9/20/2002 3:20:18 PM		2		
4643	NKA	'Map shows little road influence on Ole Creek.'	9/20/2002 3:21:33 PM		3		
4644	NKA	'Map shows little road influence on Ole Creek.'	9/20/2002 3:21:33 PM		3		
4645	NKA	'D.O. samples in Ole Creek, values ranged from 4.4-12.4.  Low D.O. samples may have been taken in isolated pools when summer flows went subsurface.'	9/20/2002 3:32:57 PM		2		
4646	NKA	'D.O. samples in Ole Creek, values ranged from 4.4-12.4.  Low D.O. samples may have been taken in isolated pools when summer flows went subsurface.'	9/20/2002 3:32:57 PM		4		
4647	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4648	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4649	WG	'Pacific Corp reports 5% fines from spawning gravel substrate samples not used but used road density.'	3/10/2003 6:07:29 AM		3		
4650	WG	'Pacific Corp reports 5% fines from spawning gravel substrate samples not used but used road density.'	3/10/2003 6:07:29 AM		3		
4651	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4652	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4653	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4654	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4655	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4656	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4657	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:48 PM		1		
4658	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:48 PM		2		
4659	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4660	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4661	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4662	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4663	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4664	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4665	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4666	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4667	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/25/2002 9:18:04 AM		4		
4668	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/25/2002 9:18:04 AM		4		
4669	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:22:41 AM		4		
4670	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:22:41 AM		4		
4671	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4672	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4673	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4674	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4675	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4676	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4677	WG	'All reaches below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 1:50:58 PM		3		
4678	WG	'All reaches below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/25/2002 1:50:58 PM		3		
4679	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4680	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4681	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4682	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4683	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4684	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4685	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4686	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4687	NKA	'30ft falls 0.8mi from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/20/2002 3:28:54 PM		1		
4688	NKA	'30ft falls 0.8mi from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/20/2002 3:28:54 PM		2		
4689	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4690	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		2		
4691	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4692	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		4		
4693	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:01:52 AM		2		
4694	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:01:52 AM		3		
4695	NKA	'Temps monitored after Jan 24, 2000.  Lowest recorded temp was 3.4 on 1/31.  (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 3:35:05 PM		2		
4696	NKA	'Temps monitored after Jan 24, 2000.  Lowest recorded temp was 3.4 on 1/31.  (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 3:35:05 PM		4		
4697	NKA	'Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed 16 degrees was exceeded 6 times. Max temp of 16.6 occurred on 8/23. Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:30:01 AM		2		
4698	NKA	'Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed 16 degrees was exceeded 6 times. Max temp of 16.6 occurred on 8/23. Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:30:01 AM		3		
4699	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4700	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 3 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 3:15:47 PM		3		
4701	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/20/2002 3:56:00 PM		2		
4702	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/20/2002 3:56:00 PM		2		
4703	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report states that cover from LWD is abundant through the reach.'	9/20/2002 3:31:02 PM		4		
4704	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report states that cover from LWD is abundant through the reach.'	9/20/2002 3:31:02 PM		4		
4705	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:11 PM		1		
4706	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:11 PM		3		
4707	Nick Ackerman	' Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:05 PM		1		
4708	Nick Ackerman	' Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:19:05 PM		3		
4709	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		1		
4710	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4711	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4712	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4713	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4714	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4715	NKA	' Rosgen channel type A/B (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:07:36 PM		2		
4716	NKA	' Rosgen channel type A/B (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:07:36 PM		3		
4717	nka	''	9/20/2002 1:01:36 PM		4		
4718	nka	''	9/20/2002 1:01:36 PM		4		
4719	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		1		
4720	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4721	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4722	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4723	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4724	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4725	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4726	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4727	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4728	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4729	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4730	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4731	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		1		
4732	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4733	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		1		
4734	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		1		
4735	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4736	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4737	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4738	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4739	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4740	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4741	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4742	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4743	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4744	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4745	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:47:19 AM		4		
4746	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:47:19 AM		4		
4747	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4748	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4749	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4750	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4751	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4752	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4753	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4754	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4755	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4756	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4757	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4758	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4759	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4760	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4761	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4762	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4763	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 1:01:22 PM		1		
4764	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 1:01:22 PM		1		
4765	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4766	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		2		
4767	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4768	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4769	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:30 AM		3		
4770	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:30 AM		3		
4771	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4772	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4773	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4774	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4775	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4776	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		3		
4777	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4778	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4779	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4780	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:19 AM		4		
4781	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:03:16 PM		1		
4782	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:03:16 PM		4		
4783	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 1:03:13 PM		1		
4784	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 1:03:13 PM		4		
4785	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		1		
4786	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4787	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4788	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4789	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4790	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4791	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A (Pacific Corp FERC report.)'	9/20/2002 1:16:17 PM		2		
4792	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A (Pacific Corp FERC report.)'	9/20/2002 1:16:17 PM		3		
4793	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Maps shows road following much of reach length'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4794	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Maps shows road following much of reach length'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4795	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		1		
4796	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4797	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4798	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4799	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4800	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4801	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4802	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4803	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4804	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4805	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4806	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4807	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		1		
4808	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4809	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		1		
4810	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		1		
4811	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4812	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4813	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4814	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4815	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4816	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4817	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4818	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4819	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4820	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4821	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:50:10 AM		4		
4822	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:50:10 AM		4		
4823	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4824	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4825	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4826	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4827	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4828	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4829	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4830	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4831	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4832	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4833	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4834	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4835	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4836	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4837	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4838	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4839	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20ft falls at 1355ft upstream'	9/20/2002 1:17:03 PM		1		
4840	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 20ft falls at 1355ft upstream'	9/20/2002 1:17:03 PM		1		
4841	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4842	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		2		
4843	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4844	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4845	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:06:00 AM		2		
4846	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:06:00 AM		3		
4847	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4848	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4849	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4850	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4851	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4852	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4853	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		3		
4854	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4855	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4856	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:32 AM		4		
4857	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:15:55 PM		1		
4858	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:15:55 PM		4		
4859	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:15:52 PM		1		
4860	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:15:52 PM		4		
4861	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4862	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4863	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4864	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4865	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4866	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4867	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:05:34 PM		2		
4868	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:05:34 PM		3		
4869	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Maps shows road following much of reach length'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4870	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Maps shows road following much of reach length'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4871	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4872	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4873	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4874	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4875	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4876	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4877	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4878	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4879	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4880	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4881	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4882	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4883	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4884	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4885	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4886	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4887	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4888	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4889	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4890	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4891	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4892	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4893	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4894	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4895	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4896	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4897	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:48:02 AM		4		
4898	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:48:02 AM		4		
4899	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4900	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4901	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4902	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4903	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4904	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4905	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4906	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4907	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4908	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4909	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4910	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4911	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4912	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4913	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4914	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4915	NKA	'Culvert with 3.5ft drop off 1.0 miles upstream'	9/20/2002 1:04:49 PM		1		
4916	NKA	'Culvert with 3.5ft drop off 1.0 miles upstream'	9/20/2002 1:04:49 PM		1		
4917	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4918	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		2		
4919	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4920	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4921	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:37 AM		2		
4922	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:37 AM		3		
4923	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4924	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4925	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4926	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4927	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4928	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4929	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		3		
4930	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4931	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4932	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4933	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4934	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4935	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		1		
4936	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	9/20/2002 8:32:22 AM		4		
4937	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		1		
4938	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4939	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4940	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4941	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4942	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4943	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report, Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 1:11:55 PM		2		
4944	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report, Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 1:11:55 PM		3		
4945	nka	''	9/20/2002 1:12:28 PM		4		
4946	nka	''	9/20/2002 1:12:28 PM		4		
4947	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		1		
4948	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4949	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4950	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4951	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4952	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4953	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4954	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4955	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4956	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4957	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		1		
4958	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4959	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		1		
4960	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4961	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:11:45 PM		1		
4962	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:11:45 PM		1		
4963	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		1		
4964	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4965	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4966	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4967	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4968	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4969	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4970	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4971	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4972	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4973	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:49:04 AM		4		
4974	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:49:04 AM		4		
4975	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4976	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4977	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4978	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4979	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4980	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4981	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4982	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4983	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4984	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
4985	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4986	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4987	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4988	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4989	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4990	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4991	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 6.5 foot falls at RM1.1.'	9/20/2002 1:08:41 PM		1		
4992	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents 6.5 foot falls at RM1.1.'	9/20/2002 1:08:41 PM		1		
4993	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4994	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		2		
4995	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4996	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
4997	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:45 AM		2		
4998	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:45 AM		3		
4999	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5000	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5001	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5002	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5003	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
5004	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
5005	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		3		
5006	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5007	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5008	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:26 AM		4		
5009	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:12:05 PM		1		
5010	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:12:05 PM		4		
5011	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:12:01 PM		1		
5012	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:12:01 PM		4		
5013	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5014	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5015	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5016	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5017	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5018	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5019	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A/B (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:13:59 PM		2		
5020	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A/B (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 1:13:59 PM		3		
5021		''	9/20/2002 1:14:47 PM		4		
5022		''	9/20/2002 1:14:47 PM		4		
5023	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5024	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5025	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5026	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5027	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5028	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5029	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5030	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5031	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5032	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: 11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5033	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5034	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5035	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5036	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: brook and brown trout'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5037	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5038	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5039	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		1		
5040	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5041	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5042	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5043	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5044	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5045	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5046	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5047	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5048	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5049	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:49:51 AM		4		
5050	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:49:51 AM		4		
5051	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5052	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5053	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5054	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5055	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5056	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5057	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5058	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5059	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5060	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5061	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5062	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5063	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5064	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5065	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5066	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5067	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 1:15:00 PM		1		
5068	NKA	' Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/20/2002 1:15:00 PM		1		
5069	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5070	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		2		
5071	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5072	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5073	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:53 AM		2		
5074	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/24/2002 11:05:53 AM		3		
5075	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5076	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5077	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5078	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5079	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5080	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5081	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		3		
5082	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5083	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5084	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pine Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/20/2002 8:32:29 AM		4		
5085	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:13:37 PM		1		
5086	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:13:37 PM		4		
5087	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:13:33 PM		1		
5088	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:13:33 PM		4		
5089	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:22 PM		2		
5090	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:22 PM		4		
5091	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:50 PM		4		
5092	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:32:50 PM		4		
5093	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:43:08 AM		3		
5094	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:43:08 AM		3		
5095	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report. Rosgen Channel type A'	9/17/2002 7:36:43 AM		2		
5096	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report. Rosgen Channel type A'	9/17/2002 7:36:43 AM		2		
5097	NKA	'Map shows possible modifications to the stream from a road'	8/30/2002 4:05:27 PM		3		
5098	NKA	'Map shows possible modifications to the stream from a road'	8/30/2002 4:05:27 PM		4		
5099	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:12:58 PM		2		
5100	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:12:58 PM		4		
5101	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:22:37 PM		3		
5102	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:22:37 PM		3		
5103		'Wetted width is only 5 ft while ACW is 40 ft.  Likely subject to moderate and rapid changes in flow from freshets.'	8/29/2002 2:30:13 PM		3		
5104		'Wetted width is only 5 ft while ACW is 40 ft.  Likely subject to moderate and rapid changes in flow from freshets.'	8/29/2002 2:30:13 PM		4		
5105	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996).'	2/11/2003 8:43:53 AM		3		
5106	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996).'	2/11/2003 8:43:53 AM		3		
5107	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:18:22 AM		2		
5108	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:18:22 AM		2		
5109	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:25 PM		2		
5110	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:25 PM		2		
5111	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/29/2002 2:29:59 PM		1		
5112	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/29/2002 2:29:59 PM		2		
5113		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:38 PM		1		
5114		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:38 PM		2		
5115	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:07 PM		2		
5116	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:07 PM		2		
5117	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:19 PM		4		
5118	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:19 PM		4		
5119		'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:24 PM		4		
5120		'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:24 PM		4		
5121	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:15 PM		4		
5122	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:15 PM		4		
5123	WG	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:00 PM		4		
5124	WG	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:00 PM		4		
5125	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:23:12 AM		4		
5126	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:23:12 AM		4		
5127	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:08 PM		4		
5128	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:08 PM		4		
5129	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:11 PM		4		
5130	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:11 PM		4		
5131	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:05 PM		4		
5132	NKA	'Assumed similar to Range Creek.'	9/19/2002 7:32:05 PM		4		
5133	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:04:39 AM		3		
5134	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:04:39 AM		3		
5135	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:29:59 PM		3		
5136	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:29:59 PM		3		
5137	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:18 PM		2		
5138	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:18 PM		2		
5139	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:22 PM		2		
5140	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:22 PM		2		
5141	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:13 PM		2		
5142	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:13 PM		2		
5143	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  30 ft falls 1589 ft upstream from mouth'	9/19/2002 6:38:16 PM		1		
5144	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  30 ft falls 1589 ft upstream from mouth'	9/19/2002 6:38:16 PM		2		
5145	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:30 AM		2		
5146	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:30 AM		2		
5147	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members. Panamaker has been heavily impacted by logging and development.'	9/26/2002 9:32:31 AM		3		
5148	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members. Panamaker has been heavily impacted by logging and development.'	9/26/2002 9:32:31 AM		2		
5149	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:02 AM		2		
5150	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:02 AM		3		
5151	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:30:14 PM		4		
5152	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:30:14 PM		4		
5153	NKA	'Cloned from Crab'	9/19/2002 6:20:54 PM		4		
5154	NKA	'Cloned from Crab'	9/19/2002 6:20:54 PM		4		
5155	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:04:16 AM		3		
5156	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:04:16 AM		3		
5157	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is more turbid than template due to roads and extensive logging.'	9/16/2002 3:53:16 PM		3		
5158	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is more turbid than template due to roads and extensive logging.'	9/16/2002 3:53:16 PM		4		
5159	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report says that LWD is "somewhat limited" in Panamaker Cr.'	9/26/2002 9:32:39 AM		4		
5160	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report says that LWD is "somewhat limited" in Panamaker Cr.'	9/26/2002 9:32:39 AM		4		
5161	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:09 PM		1		
5162	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:09 PM		3		
5163	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:04 PM		1		
5164	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:31:04 PM		3		
5165	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5166	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5167	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5168	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5169	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5170	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5171	NKA	'Pacific Corp GIS map classifies Pepper Cr. as a Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 12:19:20 PM		1		
5172	NKA	'Pacific Corp GIS map classifies Pepper Cr. as a Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 12:19:20 PM		2		
5173	NKA	'No road influence in the lower 0.4 miles'	9/20/2002 12:20:19 PM		2		
5174	NKA	'No road influence in the lower 0.4 miles'	9/20/2002 12:20:19 PM		2		
5175	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5176	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5177	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 11:12:03 AM		3		
5178	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 11:12:03 AM		3		
5179	WG	'Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 11:11:56 AM		3		
5180	WG	'Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 11:11:56 AM		3		
5181	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5182	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5183	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		1		
5184	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5185	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		1		
5186	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5187	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		1		
5188	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5189	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:53 AM		3		
5190	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:53 AM		3		
5191	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:59 AM		3		
5192	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:59 AM		3		
5193	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:48 AM		3		
5194	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:48 AM		3		
5195	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:28 AM		3		
5196	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:28 AM		3		
5197	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:23:39 AM		4		
5198	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:23:39 AM		4		
5199	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:39 AM		3		
5200	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:39 AM		3		
5201	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:44 AM		3		
5202	WG	' Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:44 AM		3		
5203	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:34 AM		3		
5204	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 11:17:34 AM		3		
5205	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5206	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5207	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5208	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5209	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5210	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5211	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5212	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5213	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5214	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5215	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn?t note any barriers.'	9/20/2002 11:13:14 AM		1		
5216	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn?t note any barriers.'	9/20/2002 11:13:14 AM		2		
5217	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5218	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5219	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5220	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient rated slightly higher because of roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5221	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5222	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5223	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5224	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5225	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5226	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5227	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5228	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		3		
5229	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:34:43 AM		3		
5230	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:34:43 AM		4		
5231	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		2		
5232	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:48 AM		4		
5233	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:21:16 PM		1		
5234	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:21:16 PM		3		
5235	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:21:12 PM		1		
5236	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:21:12 PM		3		
5237	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/16/2002 3:20:04 PM		1		
5238	NKA	'Pacific Corp. FERC report says alk ranged from 18-44'	9/16/2002 3:20:04 PM		4		
5239	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:10 PM		4		
5240	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:10 PM		4		
5241	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:43:20 AM		3		
5242	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:43:20 AM		3		
5243	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A/B (USFS)'	9/24/2002 10:24:29 AM		2		
5244	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A/B (USFS)'	9/24/2002 10:24:29 AM		3		
5245	nka	'Maps shows road following much of reach length'	8/30/2002 4:41:55 PM		2		
5246	nka	'Maps shows road following much of reach length'	8/30/2002 4:41:55 PM		3		
5247	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:10:25 PM		1		
5248	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Pine Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:10:25 PM		4		
5249	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:43:34 PM		3		
5250	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:43:34 PM		3		
5251	NKA	'Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	8/26/2002 10:45:08 AM		2		
5252	NKA	'Lewis River WRIA reports that USFS calculated a 12-22% increase in peak flows in Pine Creek due to St. Helens eruption and logging.'	8/26/2002 10:45:08 AM		4		
5253	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:43:19 PM		3		
5254	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:43:19 PM		3		
5255	NKA	'11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/16/2002 9:28:37 AM		2		
5256	NKA	'11 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, brook trout, brown trout.  Template:  10 spp. No brook trout'	9/16/2002 9:28:37 AM		2		
5257	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:40 PM		1		
5258	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:40 PM		2		
5259	NKA	'brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:15:44 PM		1		
5260	NKA	'brook and brown trout'	9/16/2002 4:15:44 PM		2		
5261	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	9/17/2002 2:13:19 PM		1		
5262	NKA	'USFS stream survey report'	9/17/2002 2:13:19 PM		1		
5263	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:16 PM		1		
5264	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:16 PM		2		
5265	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:22 AM		3		
5266	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:22 AM		3		
5267	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:30 AM		3		
5268	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:30 AM		4		
5269	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:14 AM		3		
5270	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:14 AM		3		
5271	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:40 AM		3		
5272	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:40 AM		3		
5273	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:24:08 AM		4		
5274	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:24:08 AM		4		
5275	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:59 AM		3		
5276	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:59 AM		3		
5277	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:07 AM		3		
5278	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:53:07 AM		3		
5279	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:49 AM		3		
5280	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 7:52:49 AM		3		
5281	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:05:04 AM		3		
5282	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:05:04 AM		3		
5283	NKA	'Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	8/26/2002 10:20:45 AM		3		
5284	NKA	'Western Cascade stream not likely to experience icing'	8/26/2002 10:20:45 AM		3		
5285	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:44 PM		2		
5286	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:44 PM		2		
5287	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:49 PM		2		
5288	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:49 PM		2		
5289	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:40 PM		2		
5290	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:50:40 PM		2		
5291	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 7:02:42 PM		1		
5292	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report doesn't document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 7:02:42 PM		1		
5293	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:44 AM		2		
5294	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:29:44 AM		2		
5295	NKA	'USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/17/2002 10:23:31 AM		2		
5296	NKA	'USFS reports riparian area devastated from Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows.  Lewis River WRIA report says that 50-75% of Pine Creek basin has been harvested.'	9/17/2002 10:23:31 AM		2		
5297	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:18:39 AM		2		
5298	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:18:39 AM		3		
5299	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 9:30:50 AM		2		
5300	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 3/21/00.  Min temps before and after those dates reach 4.0 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 4.'	9/17/2002 9:30:50 AM		3		
5301	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/17/2002 8:31:30 AM		1		
5302	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reports max temp of 14.3 deg Celcius at mouth on July 28, 1999.  WG suggests that template conditions for pine similar to present conditions for Cougar but slightly warmer due to stream length, aspect, and canopy.'	9/17/2002 8:31:30 AM		3		
5303	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:05:54 AM		3		
5304	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:05:54 AM		3		
5305	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:55:28 PM		3		
5306	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:55:28 PM		4		
5307	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:48:35 PM		2		
5308	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 8 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:48:35 PM		3		
5309	NKA	'Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	8/26/2002 10:17:00 AM		1		
5310	NKA	'Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	8/26/2002 10:17:00 AM		4		
5311	NKA	'Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	8/26/2002 10:16:39 AM		1		
5312	NKA	'Patient:  USFS avg bankfull width measurement.   Template:  USFS report documents that Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mud flows significantly widended the channel.'	8/26/2002 10:16:39 AM		4		
5313	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:09:34 AM		4		
5314	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 8:09:34 AM		4		
5315	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:41 PM		2		
5316	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:41 PM		4		
5317	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:21 PM		4		
5318	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:21 PM		4		
5319	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:00 AM		3		
5320	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:00 AM		3		
5321	NKA	'Based on Rosgen channel type A/B from Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 7:37:07 AM		1		
5322	NKA	'Based on Rosgen channel type A/B from Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 7:37:07 AM		2		
5323	NKA	'Map shows road following lower Rain Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:18:20 PM		3		
5324	NKA	'Map shows road following lower Rain Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:18:20 PM		4		
5325	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:06:17 PM		2		
5326	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:06:17 PM		4		
5327	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:23:23 PM		3		
5328	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:23:23 PM		3		
5329	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Used the density for "Upper Yale Lake Tribs."'	9/17/2002 4:00:47 PM		3		
5330	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Used the density for "Upper Yale Lake Tribs."'	9/17/2002 4:00:47 PM		3		
5331	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:19:48 AM		2		
5332	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:19:48 AM		2		
5333	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:55 PM		1		
5334	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:41:55 PM		2		
5335	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/29/2002 2:20:51 PM		1		
5336	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/29/2002 2:20:51 PM		2		
5337		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:58:52 PM		2		
5338		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 1:58:52 PM		3		
5339	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:34 PM		1		
5340	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:34 PM		2		
5341	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:50 AM		4		
5342	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:50 AM		4		
5343		'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:58 AM		4		
5344		'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:58 AM		4		
5345	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:46 AM		4		
5346	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:46 AM		4		
5347	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:33 AM		4		
5348	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:33 AM		4		
5349	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:24:46 AM		4		
5350	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:24:46 AM		4		
5351	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:39 AM		4		
5352	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:39 AM		4		
5353	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:43 AM		4		
5354	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:43 AM		4		
5355	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:36 AM		4		
5356	NKA	'Assumed similar to upper Speelyai (Frank Shrier)'	9/25/2002 10:20:36 AM		4		
5357	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:05:21 AM		3		
5358	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:05:21 AM		3		
5359	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:20:51 PM		3		
5360	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:20:51 PM		3		
5361	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:08 PM		2		
5362	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:08 PM		2		
5363	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:11 PM		2		
5364	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:11 PM		2		
5365	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:05 PM		2		
5366	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:05 PM		2		
5367	nka	'40 ft falls 4685 ft from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/19/2002 6:39:59 PM		1		
5368	nka	'40 ft falls 4685 ft from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/19/2002 6:39:59 PM		2		
5369	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:12 AM		2		
5370	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:12 AM		2		
5371	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:24:00 AM		2		
5372	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:24:00 AM		2		
5373	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:48 AM		2		
5374	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:48 AM		3		
5375	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:31:21 PM		4		
5376	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:31:21 PM		4		
5377	NKA	'Cloned from Ole Cr.'	9/25/2002 8:53:55 AM		4		
5378	NKA	'Cloned from Ole Cr.'	9/25/2002 8:53:55 AM		4		
5379	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:06:04 AM		3		
5380	WG	'Moderately confined to confined channel may have limited sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:06:04 AM		3		
5381	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:53:42 PM		3		
5382	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:53:42 PM		4		
5383	NKA	'Couldn?t find LWD density data for Rain Cr.  Harza survey states that cover from LWD was common throughout the survey.'	9/18/2002 3:13:22 PM		3		
5384	NKA	'Couldn?t find LWD density data for Rain Cr.  Harza survey states that cover from LWD was common throughout the survey.'	9/18/2002 3:13:22 PM		3		
5385	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:22:07 PM		1		
5386	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:22:07 PM		3		
5387	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:21:50 PM		1		
5388	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	8/29/2002 2:21:50 PM		3		
5389	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:57 PM		2		
5390	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:18:57 PM		4		
5391	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:33 PM		4		
5392	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:33 PM		4		
5393	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:16 AM		3		
5394	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:16 AM		3		
5395	NKA	'USFS stream survey report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/17/2002 7:37:54 AM		2		
5396	NKA	'USFS stream survey report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/17/2002 7:37:54 AM		2		
5397	NKA	'Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:34:31 PM		2		
5398	NKA	'Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:34:31 PM		2		
5399	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:12:38 PM		1		
5400	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:12:38 PM		4		
5401	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:20:42 PM		3		
5402	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:20:42 PM		3		
5403	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/17/2002 4:04:33 PM		3		
5404	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/17/2002 4:04:33 PM		3		
5405	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:20:15 AM		2		
5406	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:20:15 AM		2		
5407	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:32 PM		1		
5408	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:32 PM		2		
5409	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/26/2002 12:58:39 PM		1		
5410	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	8/26/2002 12:58:39 PM		2		
5411		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:01:23 PM		1		
5412		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/17/2002 2:01:23 PM		2		
5413	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:47 PM		1		
5414	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:47 PM		2		
5415	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:48 PM		3		
5416	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:48 PM		3		
5417	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:53 PM		3		
5418	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:53 PM		3		
5419	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:44 PM		3		
5420	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:44 PM		3		
5421	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:26 PM		3		
5422	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:26 PM		3		
5423	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:25:50 AM		4		
5424	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:25:50 AM		4		
5425	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:36 PM		3		
5426	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:36 PM		3		
5427	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:41 PM		3		
5428	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:41 PM		3		
5429	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:33 PM		3		
5430	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/19/2002 2:03:33 PM		3		
5431	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:05:31 AM		3		
5432	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:05:31 AM		3		
5433	NKA	' Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 1:01:18 PM		3		
5434	NKA	' Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 1:01:18 PM		3		
5435	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:30 PM		2		
5436	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:30 PM		2		
5437	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:34 PM		2		
5438	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:34 PM		2		
5439	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:27 PM		2		
5440	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:27 PM		2		
5441	NKA	'50 ft falls 3486 ft up from mouth. (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:42:15 PM		1		
5442	NKA	'50 ft falls 3486 ft up from mouth. (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/19/2002 6:42:15 PM		2		
5443	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:27 AM		2		
5444	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:27 AM		2		
5445	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:24:12 AM		4		
5446	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:24:12 AM		4		
5447	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:57 AM		2		
5448	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:02:57 AM		3		
5449	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:09 PM		4		
5450	NKA	'Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:28:09 PM		4		
5451	NKA	'Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:09:31 PM		3		
5452	NKA	'Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:09:31 PM		4		
5453	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:09:32 AM		3		
5454	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:09:32 AM		3		
5455	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:57:03 PM		3		
5456	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/16/2002 3:57:03 PM		3		
5457	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:44:35 PM		3		
5458	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:44:35 PM		3		
5459	NKA	'USFS Range Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 1:00:29 PM		1		
5460	NKA	'USFS Range Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 1:00:29 PM		4		
5461	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.'	8/26/2002 1:00:11 PM		1		
5462	Nick Ackerman	'USFS stream survey report.'	8/26/2002 1:00:11 PM		4		
5463	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5464	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5465	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5466	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5467	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5468	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5469	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5470	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5471	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5472	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5473	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5474	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5475	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:32:47 AM		3		
5476	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:32:47 AM		3		
5477	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5478	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5479	WG	'Patient Set to 4 to reflect fact that reach is inundated'	2/11/2003 8:16:12 AM		3		
5480	WG	'Patient Set to 4 to reflect fact that reach is inundated'	2/11/2003 8:16:12 AM		4		
5481	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5482	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5483	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5484	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5485	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5486	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5487	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		1		
5488	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5489	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5490	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5491	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5492	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5493	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5494	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5495	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5496	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5497	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5498	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5499	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5500	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5501	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5502	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5503	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5504	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5505	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5506	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5507	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5508	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		4		
5509	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Professional opinion of workgroup. KM changed to reflect Flow pattern For Range Creek'	2/11/2003 8:15:13 AM		3		
5510	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Professional opinion of workgroup. KM changed to reflect Flow pattern For Range Creek'	2/11/2003 8:15:13 AM		3		
5511	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5512	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5513	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5514	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5515	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5516	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5517	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5518	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5519	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5520	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5521	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5522	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5523	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5524	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5525	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5526	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5527	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5528	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5529	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5530	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5531	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5532	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5533	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5534	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5535	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5536	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		3		
5537		''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		1		
5538		''	2/11/2003 7:52:19 AM		2		
5539	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:14:21 AM		2		
5540	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:14:21 AM		4		
5541	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:14:12 AM		2		
5542	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:14:12 AM		4		
5543	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents an impassable falls just 320 ft upstream.'	8/27/2002 1:39:38 PM		1		
5544	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents an impassable falls just 320 ft upstream.'	8/27/2002 1:39:38 PM		1		
5545	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:08 PM		2		
5546	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:08 PM		4		
5547	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:44 PM		4		
5548	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:44 PM		4		
5549	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:41 AM		3		
5550	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:44:41 AM		3		
5551	NKA	'In the upper basin. Assumed Rosgen A like most of the rest of the upper streams.  Pacific Corp GIS map classifies it as a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:26:24 AM		3		
5552	NKA	'In the upper basin. Assumed Rosgen A like most of the rest of the upper streams.  Pacific Corp GIS map classifies it as a Rosgen A.'	9/24/2002 10:26:24 AM		3		
5553	NKA	'Maps show little to no influence from roads'	9/2/2002 9:06:59 AM		2		
5554	NKA	'Maps show little to no influence from roads'	9/2/2002 9:06:59 AM		2		
5555	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Rush Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:09:44 PM		1		
5556	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Rush Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:09:44 PM		4		
5557	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:18:36 PM		3		
5558	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:18:36 PM		3		
5559	NKA	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road densities for upper and lower Rush were averaged.'	9/17/2002 3:55:17 PM		3		
5560	NKA	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road densities for upper and lower Rush were averaged.'	9/17/2002 3:55:17 PM		3		
5561	NKA	'10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, bull trout.'	9/16/2002 9:20:50 AM		2		
5562	NKA	'10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, bull trout.'	9/16/2002 9:20:50 AM		2		
5563	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:45 PM		1		
5564	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:45 PM		2		
5565	NKA	'Brook trout'	8/26/2002 9:54:36 AM		1		
5566	NKA	'Brook trout'	8/26/2002 9:54:36 AM		2		
5567		'USFS reports 8% as avg gradient'	9/17/2002 2:24:45 PM		1		
5568		'USFS reports 8% as avg gradient'	9/17/2002 2:24:45 PM		3		
5569	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:59 PM		1		
5570	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:04:59 PM		2		
5571	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:28 PM		4		
5572	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:28 PM		4		
5573		'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:32 PM		4		
5574		'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:32 PM		4		
5575	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:25 PM		4		
5576	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:25 PM		4		
5577	NKA	'Data came from the 1994 Rush Cr. habitat typing survey.  % pools in the survey seems low.  Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/25/2002 10:46:19 AM		3		
5578	NKA	'Data came from the 1994 Rush Cr. habitat typing survey.  % pools in the survey seems low.  Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/25/2002 10:46:19 AM		4		
5579	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:28:33 AM		4		
5580	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:28:33 AM		4		
5581	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:16 PM		2		
5582	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:16 PM		4		
5583	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:21 PM		3		
5584	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:21 PM		4		
5585	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:12 PM		3		
5586	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 5:39:12 PM		4		
5587	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:07:18 AM		3		
5588	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:07:18 AM		3		
5589	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/23/2002 5:09:34 PM		3		
5590	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/23/2002 5:09:34 PM		3		
5591	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:52 PM		2		
5592	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:52 PM		2		
5593	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:56 PM		2		
5594	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:56 PM		2		
5595	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:48 PM		2		
5596	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:51:48 PM		2		
5597	NKA	'70 ft falls at RM 1.7 (USFS hab survey)'	9/19/2002 6:50:05 PM		1		
5598	NKA	'70 ft falls at RM 1.7 (USFS hab survey)'	9/19/2002 6:50:05 PM		1		
5599	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:48 AM		2		
5600	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:30:48 AM		2		
5601	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient slightly higher because of logging and roads.'	9/17/2002 10:24:48 AM		2		
5602	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.  Patient slightly higher because of logging and roads.'	9/17/2002 10:24:48 AM		2		
5603	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:19:43 AM		2		
5604	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:19:43 AM		3		
5605	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/9/94 and 11/1/94.  Min daily temp on 11/1/94 was 2.0 degrees.  I assumed some colder temperature occur in Dec. and Jan.'	9/17/2002 10:03:23 AM		2		
5606	NKA	'Pacific Corp. Preliminary water quality report (1995) reports temps recorded between 8/9/94 and 11/1/94.  Min daily temp on 11/1/94 was 2.0 degrees.  I assumed some colder temperature occur in Dec. and Jan.'	9/17/2002 10:03:23 AM		3		
5607	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents temperature data taken from 8/9/94-11/1/94.  Max temp of 9.8 was recorded on 3 occassions in August.'	9/17/2002 9:14:04 AM		1		
5608	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC Preliminary water quality report (1995) documents temperature data taken from 8/9/94-11/1/94.  Max temp of 9.8 was recorded on 3 occassions in August.'	9/17/2002 9:14:04 AM		3		
5609	WG	'Rush Cr. is a cool Bull trout stream and may have groundwater influences.'	9/17/2002 8:08:25 AM		3		
5610	WG	'Rush Cr. is a cool Bull trout stream and may have groundwater influences.'	9/17/2002 8:08:25 AM		3		
5611	NKA	'Data from Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report indicates low turbidity in Rush.  Proffessional observation indicates turbidity is low year round, and little change has likely occurred from template conditions.'	9/16/2002 3:48:49 PM		3		
5612	NKA	'Data from Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report indicates low turbidity in Rush.  Proffessional observation indicates turbidity is low year round, and little change has likely occurred from template conditions.'	9/16/2002 3:48:49 PM		3		
5613	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 50 pieces/mile in Rush Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:19:25 PM		3		
5614	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 50 pieces/mile in Rush Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:19:25 PM		3		
5615	NKA	'Comments for reach are: USFS Cougar Creek stream survey wetted width measurement'	8/26/2002 9:27:27 AM		1		
5616	NKA	'Comments for reach are: USFS Cougar Creek stream survey wetted width measurement'	8/26/2002 9:27:27 AM		4		
5617	Nick Ackerman	' Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.  Average Bankfull width.'	8/26/2002 9:27:21 AM		1		
5618	Nick Ackerman	' Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report.  Average Bankfull width.'	8/26/2002 9:27:21 AM		4		
5619	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5620	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5621	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5622	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5623	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5624	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5625	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies reach as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:56:40 PM		3		
5626	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies reach as Rosgen type A.'	9/20/2002 12:56:40 PM		3		
5627	NKA	''	9/20/2002 12:56:15 PM		4		
5628	NKA	''	9/20/2002 12:56:15 PM		4		
5629	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5630	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5631	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5632	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5633	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5634	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5635	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5636	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5637	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		1		
5638	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5639	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5640	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5641		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:58:02 PM		1		
5642		'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:58:02 PM		2		
5643	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		1		
5644	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5645	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5646	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5647	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5648	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5649	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5650	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5651	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5652	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5653	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:50:46 AM		4		
5654	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:50:46 AM		4		
5655	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5656	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5657	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5658	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5659	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5660	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5661	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5662	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5663	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5664	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5665	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5666	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5667	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5668	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5669	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5670	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5671	NKA	'None recorded in Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:56:01 PM		1		
5672	NKA	'None recorded in Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 12:56:01 PM		2		
5673	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5674	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		2		
5675	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5676	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5677	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:04:43 AM		2		
5678	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:04:43 AM		3		
5679	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5680	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5681	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5682	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5683	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5684	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		3		
5685	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/26/2002 10:07:16 AM		3		
5686	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/26/2002 10:07:16 AM		3		
5687	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5688	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:31:07 AM		4		
5689	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:57:52 PM		1		
5690	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:57:52 PM		4		
5691	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:57:42 PM		1		
5692	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 12:57:42 PM		4		
5693	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5694	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5695	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5696	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5697	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5698	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5699	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 12:59:33 PM		2		
5700	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 12:59:33 PM		2		
5701	NKA	''	9/20/2002 12:59:14 PM		4		
5702	NKA	''	9/20/2002 12:59:14 PM		4		
5703	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		1		
5704	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5705	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5706	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5707	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5708	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5709	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5710	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5711	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		1		
5712	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
4067		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:49 PM		4		
4068		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:49 PM		4		
4069		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:52 PM		4		
4070		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:52 PM		4		
4071		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:46 PM		4		
4072		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow'	9/19/2002 7:46:46 PM		4		
4073	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:04:17 AM		3		
4074	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:04:17 AM		3		
4075	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:41:17 PM		2		
4076	nka	'Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:41:17 PM		2		
4077	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:11 PM		3		
4078	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:11 PM		3		
4079	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:17 PM		3		
4080	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:17 PM		3		
4081	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:07 PM		3		
4082	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:48:07 PM		3		
4083	NKA	'20 ft falls 40 ft up from mouth.  Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/19/2002 6:36:38 PM		1		
4084	NKA	'20 ft falls 40 ft up from mouth.  Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/19/2002 6:36:38 PM		1		
4085	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:01 AM		2		
4086	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:28:01 AM		2		
23	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:44:20 AM		1		
24	NKA	'Kinney and Lampo 2002.'	9/20/2002 10:44:20 AM		3		
25	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		3		
5713	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		1		
5714	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5738	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5739	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5740	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5741	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5742	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5743	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5744	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5745	NKA	'75 ft falls 6680 ft up from mouth. (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 12:58:58 PM		1		
5746	NKA	'75 ft falls 6680 ft up from mouth. (Pacific Corp FERC report)'	9/20/2002 12:58:58 PM		2		
5747	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5748	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5749	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5750	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5751	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:04:49 AM		2		
5752	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:04:49 AM		3		
5753	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5754	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5755	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5756	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5757	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5758	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5759	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5760	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5761	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5762	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5763	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:00:38 PM		1		
5764	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:00:38 PM		4		
5765	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:00:35 PM		1		
5766	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:00:35 PM		4		
5767	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:59 PM		3		
5768	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:59 PM		4		
5769	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		4		
5770	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		4		
5771	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5772	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5773	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen F.'	9/25/2002 1:17:47 PM		1		
5774	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen F.'	9/25/2002 1:17:47 PM		2		
5775	NKA	'Map doesn't show any influences from roads in this reach.'	9/25/2002 1:19:56 PM		2		
5776	NKA	'Map doesn't show any influences from roads in this reach.'	9/25/2002 1:19:56 PM		2		
5777	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:26:59 PM		3		
5778	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:26:59 PM		4		
5779	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/26/2002 7:37:26 AM		3		
5780	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/26/2002 7:37:26 AM		3		
5781	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).  Used road densities for lower, middle, and upper Siouxon and NF Siouxon subbasins.'	9/26/2002 7:44:51 AM		3		
5782	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).  Used road densities for lower, middle, and upper Siouxon and NF Siouxon subbasins.'	9/26/2002 7:44:51 AM		3		
5783	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:30:25 PM		2		
5784	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:30:25 PM		2		
5785	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		1		
5786	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5787	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Brook trout- USFS stream survey report.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5788	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Brook trout- USFS stream survey report.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5789	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  Avg gradient for lower 1.2 miles'	9/25/2002 1:07:30 PM		2		
5790	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  Avg gradient for lower 1.2 miles'	9/25/2002 1:07:30 PM		3		
5791	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		1		
5792	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5793	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5794	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5795	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5796	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5797	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:45 PM		3		
5798	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:45 PM		4		
5799	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/25/2002 1:18:48 PM		3		
5800	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/25/2002 1:18:48 PM		3		
5801	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5802	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5803	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5804	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5805	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5806	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5807	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5808	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5809	NKA	''	9/25/2002 1:11:15 PM		1		
5810	NKA	''	9/25/2002 1:11:15 PM		2		
5811	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5812	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5813	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/25/2002 9:08:17 AM		2		
5814	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/25/2002 9:08:17 AM		3		
5815	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		2		
5816	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:24 PM		3		
5817	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:29 PM		3		
5818	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:29 PM		4		
5819	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Siouxon 2.'	9/25/2002 1:39:33 PM		3		
5820	WG	'Assumed slightly warmer than Siouxon 2.'	9/25/2002 1:39:33 PM		3		
5821	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:51 PM		3		
5822	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:51 PM		3		
5823	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered lower watershed turbidity. Rating assigned by WG'	9/26/2002 9:39:20 AM		3		
5824	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered lower watershed turbidity. Rating assigned by WG'	9/26/2002 9:39:20 AM		3		
5825	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in upper Siouxon Cr.. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 12:36:35 PM		3		
5826	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in upper Siouxon Cr.. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 12:36:35 PM		3		
5827	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 55.3 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is only 1.2 miles long.  I assumed the width in the lower end would be larger than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average summerl width by 1.2 to get the rating of 66 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:26:06 AM		3		
5828	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 55.3 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is only 1.2 miles long.  I assumed the width in the lower end would be larger than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average summerl width by 1.2 to get the rating of 66 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:26:06 AM		4		
5829	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 81.5 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is only 1.2 miles long.  I assumed the width in the lower end would be larger than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average bankfull width by 1.2 to get the rating of 98 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:25:15 AM		3		
5830	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 81.5 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is only 1.2 miles long.  I assumed the width in the lower end would be larger than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average bankfull width by 1.2 to get the rating of 98 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:25:15 AM		4		
5831	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5832	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5833	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5834	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5835	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5836	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5837	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5838	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5839	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5840	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5841	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5842	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5843	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:26:54 AM		3		
5844	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:26:54 AM		3		
5845	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5846	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5847	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:26:42 AM		3		
5848	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:26:42 AM		4		
5849	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5850	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5851	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5852	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5853	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5854	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5855	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		1		
5856	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5857	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5858	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5859	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5860	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5861	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5862	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5863	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5864	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5865	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5866	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5867	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5868	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5869	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5870	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5871	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5872	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5873	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5874	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5875	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5876	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5877	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5878	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5879	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5880	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5881	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5882	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5883	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5884	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5885	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5886	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5887	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5888	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5889	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5890	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5891	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5892	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5893	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5894	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5895	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5896	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5897	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5898	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5899	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5900	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5901	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5902	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5903	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5904	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		3		
5905		''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		1		
5906		''	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5907	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		2		
5908	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:51:37 AM		4		
5909	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:07:05 AM		2		
5910	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Widths changed to reflect upstream reach data for Template'	2/11/2003 8:07:05 AM		4		
5911	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:51 PM		3		
5912	NKA	'Listel recommneds a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/25/2002 1:25:51 PM		4		
5913	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5914	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5915	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5916	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5917	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen F.'	9/25/2002 1:18:08 PM		1		
5918	NKA	'Pacific Corp classifies as a Rosgen F.'	9/25/2002 1:18:08 PM		2		
5919	NKA	'Map shows only minor influences from roads in the form or crossings in this reach'	9/25/2002 1:20:32 PM		2		
5920	NKA	'Map shows only minor influences from roads in the form or crossings in this reach'	9/25/2002 1:20:32 PM		2		
5921	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:27:09 PM		1		
5922	NKA	'No problems associated with D.O. in stations monitored in the Lewis Basin.'	9/25/2002 1:27:09 PM		4		
5923	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/26/2002 7:37:16 AM		3		
5924	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/26/2002 7:37:16 AM		3		
5925	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Averaged road densities for lower, upper and middle Siouxon subbasins.'	9/26/2002 7:41:29 AM		3		
5926	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Averaged road densities for lower, upper and middle Siouxon subbasins.'	9/26/2002 7:41:29 AM		3		
5927	WG	' 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:31:03 PM		2		
5928	WG	' 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/25/2002 1:31:03 PM		2		
5929	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		1		
5930	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5931	WG	''	9/25/2002 1:30:53 PM		2		
5932	WG	''	9/25/2002 1:30:53 PM		2		
5933	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  Avg. gradient for the upper 12000 ft.'	9/25/2002 1:08:51 PM		2		
5934	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.  Avg. gradient for the upper 12000 ft.'	9/25/2002 1:08:51 PM		3		
5935	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		1		
5936	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5937	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5938	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5939	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5940	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5941	KM	'Placeholder values for all habitat types until stream survey data is available.'	12/9/2002 2:16:42 PM		4		
5942	KM	'Placeholder values for all habitat types until stream survey data is available.'	12/9/2002 2:16:42 PM		4		
5943	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:38 PM		3		
5944	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:38 PM		4		
5945	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5946	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5947	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5948	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		4		
5949	KM	'Placeholder values for all habitat types until stream survey data is available.'	12/9/2002 2:16:07 PM		4		
5950	KM	'Placeholder values for all habitat types until stream survey data is available.'	12/9/2002 2:16:07 PM		4		
5951	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/25/2002 1:18:39 PM		3		
5952	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated'	9/25/2002 1:18:39 PM		3		
5953	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5954	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5955	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5956	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5957	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5958	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5959	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5960	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5961	NKA	'14 ft complex falls at RM 3.5 (PACIFIC CORP FERC Report)'	9/25/2002 1:11:03 PM		1		
5962	NKA	'14 ft complex falls at RM 3.5 (PACIFIC CORP FERC Report)'	9/25/2002 1:11:03 PM		2		
5963	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5964	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5965	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 4:17:29 PM		2		
5966	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 4:17:29 PM		2		
5967	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		2		
5968	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Drift Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:13:28 PM		3		
5969	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:23 PM		3		
5970	NKA	'All of the streams in the basin with minimum winter temperatures were rated between 0.2 and 0.8.  Assumed Siouxon would fall in this range.'	9/25/2002 1:42:23 PM		4		
5971	WG	'USFS water quality monitoring reports document that in 1999, temps in Siouxon below West Creek exceeded 16 one time between 7/7 and 10/12 in 1999.  In 2000, temperatures exceeded 16 twelve times.  Max temps in 99 and 2000 were 16.04 and 16.8 resepectively.'	9/25/2002 1:41:42 PM		1		
5972	WG	'USFS water quality monitoring reports document that in 1999, temps in Siouxon below West Creek exceeded 16 one time between 7/7 and 10/12 in 1999.  In 2000, temperatures exceeded 16 twelve times.  Max temps in 99 and 2000 were 16.04 and 16.8 resepectively.'	9/25/2002 1:41:42 PM		3		
5973	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:39 PM		3		
5974	WG	'Confined reaches unlikely to have sources of groundwater input.'	9/25/2002 1:28:39 PM		3		
5975	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered lower watershed turbidity. Rating assigned by WG.'	9/26/2002 9:39:44 AM		3		
5976	WG	'Assumed wilderness area in upper watershed has buffered lower watershed turbidity. Rating assigned by WG.'	9/26/2002 9:39:44 AM		3		
5977	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in upper Siouxon Cr.. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 12:36:16 PM		3		
5978	WG	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in upper Siouxon Cr.. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 12:36:16 PM		3		
5979	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged summer width of 55.3 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is the upper 2.3 miles.  I assumed the width in the upper end would be smaller than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average summer width by 0.8 to get the rating of 44 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:28:07 AM		3		
5980	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged summer width of 55.3 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is the upper 2.3 miles.  I assumed the width in the upper end would be smaller than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average summer width by 0.8 to get the rating of 44 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:28:07 AM		4		
5981	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 81.5 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is the upper 2.3 miles.  I assumed the width in the upper end would be smaller than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average bankfull width by 0.8 to get the rating of 65 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:27:15 AM		3		
5982	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC reports an averaged bankfull width of 81.5 feet for the lower 3.5 miles of Siouxon.  This reach is the upper 2.3 miles.  I assumed the width in the upper end would be smaller than the average because of the inputs of N.F. Siouxon.  I multiplied the average bankfull width by 0.8 to get the rating of 65 feet.'	9/26/2002 7:27:15 AM		4		
5983	GWG	'USFS Data'	5/24/2001 10:07:07 AM		2		
5984	GWG	'USFS Data'	5/24/2001 10:07:07 AM		4		
5985	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:19 PM		2		
5986	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:19 PM		4		
5987	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/18/2002 7:48:53 AM		4		
5988	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/18/2002 7:48:53 AM		4		
5989	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:04 AM		3		
5990	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:04 AM		3		
5991	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Smith as a Rosgen D channel.'	9/18/2002 8:41:59 AM		3		
5992	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Smith as a Rosgen D channel.'	9/18/2002 8:41:59 AM		3		
5993	NKA	'Map shows road running along much of western bank of Smith Creek.'	9/20/2002 10:42:10 AM		3		
5994	NKA	'Map shows road running along much of western bank of Smith Creek.'	9/20/2002 10:42:10 AM		3		
5995	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:06:32 PM		2		
5996	NKA	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:06:32 PM		4		
5997	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:44:10 PM		3		
5998	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:44:10 PM		3		
5999	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:44:05 PM		3		
6000	WG	'Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	9/19/2002 3:44:05 PM		4		
6001	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:21:18 AM		2		
6002	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:21:18 AM		2		
6003	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:58 PM		1		
6004	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:42:58 PM		2		
6005	NKA	'none reported in USFS reports'	9/2/2002 10:15:45 AM		1		
6006	NKA	'none reported in USFS reports'	9/2/2002 10:15:45 AM		2		
6007	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:23:52 PM		1		
6008	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:23:52 PM		3		
6009	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:13 PM		1		
6010	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:13 PM		2		
6011	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:30 PM		3		
6012	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:30 PM		3		
6013	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:34 PM		3		
6014	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:34 PM		3		
6015	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:26 PM		3		
6016	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:26 PM		3		
6017	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:09 PM		3		
6018	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:09 PM		3		
6019	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Increased rating in this reach because of confinement rating.'	9/24/2002 10:32:58 AM		4		
6020	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Increased rating in this reach because of confinement rating.'	9/24/2002 10:32:58 AM		4		
6021	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:18 PM		3		
6022	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:18 PM		3		
6023	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:21 PM		3		
6024	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:21 PM		4		
6025	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:14 PM		3		
6026	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/19/2002 2:14:14 PM		3		
6027	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:07:41 AM		3		
6028	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:07:41 AM		3		
6029	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/27/2002 9:01:49 AM		3		
6030	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/27/2002 9:01:49 AM		3		
6031	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:16 PM		2		
6032	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:16 PM		2		
6033	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:20 PM		2		
6034	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:20 PM		2		
6035	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:12 PM		2		
6036	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:12 PM		2		
6037		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:49:31 PM		2		
6038		'Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	9/19/2002 6:49:31 PM		2		
6039	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:31:03 AM		2		
6040	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:31:03 AM		2		
6041	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 7:51:46 AM		3		
6042	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/18/2002 7:51:46 AM		3		
6043	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:20:06 AM		3		
6044	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:20:06 AM		3		
6045	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:48 PM		3		
6046	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:29:48 PM		4		
6047	NKA	'USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS)'	9/17/2002 5:13:57 PM		2		
6048	NKA	'USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS)'	9/17/2002 5:13:57 PM		3		
6049	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:52:40 AM		3		
6050	WG	'Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	9/18/2002 8:52:40 AM		3		
6051	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:54:02 PM		3		
6052	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/16/2002 3:54:02 PM		4		
6053	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS stream survey report for Smith creek documents 13 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. .  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:49:43 PM		3		
6054	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS stream survey report for Smith creek documents 13 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. .  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	9/17/2002 12:49:43 PM		3		
6055	NKA	' USFS stream survey report.  USFS reports that St. Helens eruption widened the channel.'	8/27/2002 9:12:09 AM		1		
6056	NKA	' USFS stream survey report.  USFS reports that St. Helens eruption widened the channel.'	8/27/2002 9:12:09 AM		4		
6057	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Assumed channel was narrower prior to St. Helens eruption.'	9/26/2002 9:43:15 AM		3		
6058	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.  Assumed channel was narrower prior to St. Helens eruption.'	9/26/2002 9:43:15 AM		4		
6059	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6060	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6061	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6062	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6063	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6064	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6065	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6066	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6067	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6068	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6069	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6070	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6071	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6072	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6073	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6074	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6075	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6076	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6077	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6078	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6079	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6080	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6081	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6082	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6083	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		1		
6084	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6085	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6086	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6087	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6088	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6089	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6090	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6091	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6092	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6093	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6094	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6095	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6096	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6097	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6098	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6099	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6100	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6101	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6102	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6103	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6104	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6105	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6106	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6107	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6108	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6109	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6110	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6111	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6112	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6113	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6114	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6115	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6116	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6117	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6118	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6119	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6120	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6121	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6122	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6123	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6124	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6125	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6126	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6127	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6128	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6129	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6130	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6131	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6132	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		3		
6133		''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		1		
6134		''	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6135	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6136	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6137	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		2		
6138	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:46 AM		4		
6139	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32.  Listel recommends a value of 2 for westside streams'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		2		
6140	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		4		
6141	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6142	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6143	NKA	'Man made channel - confined'	9/25/2002 9:46:55 AM		1		
6144	NKA	'Canal'	9/25/2002 9:48:04 AM		3		
6145	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.5 mg/L'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		2		
6146	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 11:22:53 AM		2		
6147	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents sediment samples from armor and sub-armor layers.  Sampled 3 locations in upper  Speelyai Canal.  I averaged the sub-armor samples for particles <1mm for these three locations to get an average of 8% fines (<1mm).'	9/25/2002 11:22:30 AM		2		
6148	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6149	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6150	WG	'Speelyai hatchery is in the basin, but its effluents run into Speelyai 1.'	9/25/2002 9:52:23 AM		1		
6151	NKA	''	9/25/2002 9:50:30 AM		1		
6152	NKA	''	9/25/2002 9:50:30 AM		1		
6153	NKA	'Couldn't find reach specific gradient info for Speelyei canal.  Assumed same as Speelyai 1.'	9/25/2002 9:40:09 AM		3		
6154	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/25/2002 9:52:12 AM		1		
6155	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6156	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6157	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6158	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6159	WG	'Canal'	9/25/2002 12:40:52 PM		3		
6160	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6161	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6162	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.  Template: No channel existed before, man made channel.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6163	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		3		
6164	NKA	' Western Cascade stream'	9/25/2002 9:44:02 AM		3		
6165	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		2		
6166	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Speelyei 2 Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/25/2002 9:23:20 AM		2		
6167	WG	' Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/25/2002 9:49:04 AM		2		
6168	NKA	'Hatchery effluent goes into Speelyai 1.'	9/25/2002 9:49:18 AM		2		
6169	NKA	' Upper end of canal.'	9/25/2002 9:48:17 AM		1		
6170	WG	' Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/25/2002 9:50:45 AM		2		
6171	WG	' Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/25/2002 9:50:45 AM		2		
6172	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/25/2002 9:51:26 AM		3		
6173	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/25/2002 9:51:49 AM		2		
6174	NKA	'Assumed similar to Speelyei 2.'	9/25/2002 9:43:42 AM		3		
6175	NKA	'Assumed similar to Speelyei 2.'	9/25/2002 9:43:32 AM		3		
6176	WG	'Canal'	9/25/2002 9:43:52 AM		3		
6177	NKA	' Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  0 pieces of LWD/mile in lower Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/25/2002 9:52:00 AM		3		
6178	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC Report.  Template: channel is man made and did not exist before.'	9/25/2002 9:46:15 AM		1		
6179	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC Report.  Template: channel is man made and did not exist before.'	9/25/2002 9:46:04 AM		1		
6180	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32.  Listel recommends a value of 2 for westside streams'	9/20/2002 2:28:32 PM		1		
6181	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32.  Listel recommends a value of 2 for westside streams'	9/20/2002 2:28:32 PM		4		
6182	NKA	'Groundwater fed, mild peak flows.'	9/20/2002 2:11:09 PM		4		
6183	NKA	'Groundwater fed, mild peak flows.'	9/20/2002 2:11:09 PM		4		
6184	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6185	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6186	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosgen A/B.'	9/24/2002 10:40:15 AM		1		
6187	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosgen A/B.'	9/24/2002 10:40:15 AM		2		
6188	NKA	'Maps show some roads crossing lower Speelyei.'	9/20/2002 1:46:22 PM		3		
6189	NKA	'Maps show some roads crossing lower Speelyei.'	9/20/2002 1:46:22 PM		3		
6190	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.3 - 12.8.'	9/20/2002 2:30:33 PM		1		
6191	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.3 - 12.8.'	9/20/2002 2:30:33 PM		4		
6192	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 11:19:53 AM		3		
6193	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 11:19:53 AM		3		
6194	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents sediment samples from armor and sub-armor layers.  Sampled 6 locations in lower Speelyai.  I averaged the sub-armor samples for particles <1mm for these six locations to get an average of 7.7% fines (<1mm).'	9/25/2002 11:19:15 AM		3		
6195	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents sediment samples from armor and sub-armor layers.  Sampled 6 locations in lower Speelyai.  I averaged the sub-armor samples for particles <1mm for these six locations to get an average of 7.7% fines (<1mm).'	9/25/2002 11:19:15 AM		3		
6196	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6197	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6198	WG	'Speelyei hatchery in reach.'	9/20/2002 2:43:56 PM		1		
6199	WG	'Speelyei hatchery in reach.'	9/20/2002 2:43:56 PM		2		
6200	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		1		
6201	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6202	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/25/2002 9:40:53 AM		1		
6203	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/25/2002 9:40:53 AM		2		
6204	WG	'Hatchery in reach.'	9/20/2002 2:44:43 PM		1		
6205	WG	'Hatchery in reach.'	9/20/2002 2:44:43 PM		2		
6206	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:09 PM		3		
6207	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:09 PM		3		
6208	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:14 PM		3		
6209	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:14 PM		3		
6210	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:06 PM		2		
6211	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:06 PM		3		
6212	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:45 PM		3		
6213	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:45 PM		3		
6214	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6215	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		4		
6216	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:59 PM		3		
6217	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:59 PM		3		
6218	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:02 PM		3		
6219	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:00:02 PM		3		
6220	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:55 PM		3		
6221	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 1:59:55 PM		3		
6222	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6223	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6224	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6225	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		3		
6226	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6227	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6228	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6229	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6230	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6231	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6232	NKA	'Speelyai hatchery effluent flows into this reach.'	9/24/2002 11:07:27 AM		2		
6233	NKA	'Speelyai hatchery effluent flows into this reach.'	9/24/2002 11:07:27 AM		2		
6234	NKA	''	9/20/2002 2:09:04 PM		1		
6235	NKA	''	9/20/2002 2:09:04 PM		2		
6236	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6237	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 1:23:35 PM		2		
6238	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 3:01:29 PM		3		
6239	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 3:01:29 PM		3		
6240	WG	'Kokanee?'	9/24/2002 10:56:28 AM		2		
6241	WG	'Kokanee?'	9/24/2002 10:56:28 AM		3		
6242	NKA	'Pacific Corp lowest recorded temp on 12/24/98 was 5.3 degrees.'	9/20/2002 2:37:17 PM		2		
6243	NKA	'Pacific Corp lowest recorded temp on 12/24/98 was 5.3 degrees.'	9/20/2002 2:37:17 PM		4		
6244	NKA	'Patient: Sampling by Pacific Corp showed max summer temp of 14.3 degrees.  Template:  Warmer water from Speelyei 3 would have intermixed with Speelyei 1 causing warmer temps in template condition.'	9/20/2002 2:35:45 PM		1		
6245	NKA	'Patient: Sampling by Pacific Corp showed max summer temp of 14.3 degrees.  Template:  Warmer water from Speelyei 3 would have intermixed with Speelyei 1 causing warmer temps in template condition.'	9/20/2002 2:35:45 PM		3		
6246	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 2:39:51 PM		3		
6247	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 2:39:51 PM		3		
6248	WG	'Spring fed reach.  Template based on proffessional opinion of the workgroup.'	9/24/2002 3:16:40 PM		2		
6249	WG	'Spring fed reach.  Template based on proffessional opinion of the workgroup.'	9/24/2002 3:16:40 PM		2		
6250	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  16.5 pieces of LWD/mile in lower Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:15:37 PM		3		
6251	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  16.5 pieces of LWD/mile in lower Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:15:37 PM		3		
6252	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:44:39 AM		1		
6253	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:44:39 AM		4		
6254	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:44:29 AM		1		
6255	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/26/2002 9:44:29 AM		4		
6256	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 10-24.'	9/25/2002 10:07:47 AM		2		
6257	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 10-24.'	9/25/2002 10:07:47 AM		4		
6258	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		4		
6259	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		4		
6260	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		3		
6261	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		3		
6262	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies lower section as a Rosgen A/B'	9/25/2002 10:01:25 AM		1		
6263	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies lower section as a Rosgen A/B'	9/25/2002 10:01:25 AM		2		
6264	NKA	'Pacific Corp map on page WAQ 2-10 shows a road closely following upper Speelyai.'	9/25/2002 10:03:48 AM		3		
6265	NKA	'Pacific Corp map on page WAQ 2-10 shows a road closely following upper Speelyai.'	9/25/2002 10:03:48 AM		3		
6266	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 8.4 mg/L'	9/25/2002 10:07:25 AM		2		
6267	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 8.4 mg/L'	9/25/2002 10:07:25 AM		4		
6268	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 11:23:49 AM		3		
6269	WG	' Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/25/2002 11:23:49 AM		4		
6270	WG	'Assumed similar to Speelyai 1 and canal'	9/25/2002 11:23:39 AM		3		
6271	WG	'Assumed similar to Speelyai 1 and canal'	9/25/2002 11:23:39 AM		4		
6272	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6273	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6274	WG	'Speelyai hatchery is in the basin, but its effluents run into Speelyai 1.'	9/24/2002 11:24:17 AM		1		
6275	WG	'Speelyai hatchery is in the basin, but its effluents run into Speelyai 1.'	9/24/2002 11:24:17 AM		2		
6276	NKA	''	9/25/2002 10:08:11 AM		2		
6277	NKA	''	9/25/2002 10:08:11 AM		2		
6278	NKA	'Pacific Corp surveys did not survey this high in the watershed.  Assumed slightly higher than lower Speelyai'	9/25/2002 9:41:36 AM		3		
6279	NKA	'Pacific Corp surveys did not survey this high in the watershed.  Assumed slightly higher than lower Speelyai'	9/25/2002 9:41:36 AM		4		
6280	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		1		
6281	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6282	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:04 AM		3		
6283	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:04 AM		4		
6284	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:07 AM		3		
6285	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:07 AM		4		
6286	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:00 AM		3		
6287	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 10:00:00 AM		4		
6288	NKA	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:45 AM		2		
6289	NKA	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:45 AM		3		
6290	WG	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 10:00:56 AM		3		
6291	WG	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 10:00:56 AM		4		
6292	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:53 AM		2		
6293	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:53 AM		3		
6294	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:57 AM		3		
6295	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:57 AM		3		
6296	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:49 AM		2		
6297	WG	'Patient:  Used methods described in Speelyei 1.'	9/25/2002 9:59:49 AM		3		
6298	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		3		
6299	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		3		
6300	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	9/25/2002 9:57:30 AM		3		
6301	NKA	'Western Cascade stream'	9/25/2002 9:57:30 AM		3		
6302	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6303	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6304	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6305	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6306	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6307	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:43 PM		2		
6308	NKA	'Hatchery effluent goes into Speelyai 1.'	9/24/2002 1:17:35 PM		2		
6309	NKA	'Hatchery effluent goes into Speelyai 1.'	9/24/2002 1:17:35 PM		2		
6310	NKA	''	9/25/2002 10:04:18 AM		4		
6311	NKA	''	9/25/2002 10:04:18 AM		4		
6312	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/25/2002 10:08:24 AM		3		
6313	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/25/2002 10:08:24 AM		3		
6314	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 2:59:57 PM		3		
6315	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 2:59:57 PM		3		
6316	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:58:31 AM		2		
6317	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:58:31 AM		3		
6318	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports.  Temps dropped to 0.3 degrees on 12/22/98.'	9/25/2002 9:56:43 AM		2		
6319	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports.  Temps dropped to 0.3 degrees on 12/22/98.'	9/25/2002 9:56:43 AM		4		
6320	NKA	'Based off Pacific Corp FERC report data.  Upper Speelyai exceeded 16 degrees 35 times in 1999 with a max temp of 18.7.'	9/25/2002 9:55:59 AM		1		
6321	NKA	'Based off Pacific Corp FERC report data.  Upper Speelyai exceeded 16 degrees 35 times in 1999 with a max temp of 18.7.'	9/25/2002 9:55:59 AM		3		
6322	WG	'Rosgen A/B unlikely to have significant groundwater influence.  High temps confirm this.'	9/25/2002 9:57:12 AM		3		
6323	WG	'Rosgen A/B unlikely to have significant groundwater influence.  High temps confirm this.'	9/25/2002 9:57:12 AM		3		
6324	WG	'Pacific Corp recorded turbidity ratings of .01-2.1 NTU in upper Speelyai. Grab samples.'	9/25/2002 10:06:59 AM		2		
6325	WG	'Pacific Corp recorded turbidity ratings of .01-2.1 NTU in upper Speelyai. Grab samples.'	9/25/2002 10:06:59 AM		2		
6326	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  32.8 pieces of LWD/mile in upper Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/25/2002 10:10:22 AM		3		
6327	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  32.8 pieces of LWD/mile in upper Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/25/2002 10:10:22 AM		3		
6328	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC Report.'	9/26/2002 9:45:35 AM		1		
6329	NKA	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC Report.'	9/26/2002 9:45:35 AM		3		
6330	Nick Ackerman	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC Report.'	9/26/2002 9:45:30 AM		1		
6331	Nick Ackerman	'Patient:  Pacific Corp FERC Report.'	9/26/2002 9:45:30 AM		3		
6332	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32.  Listel recommends a value of 2 for westside streams'	9/20/2002 2:28:18 PM		1		
6333	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32.  Listel recommends a value of 2 for westside streams'	9/20/2002 2:28:18 PM		4		
6334	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		4		
6335	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		4		
6336	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6337	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6338	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosgen A/B.'	9/24/2002 10:41:49 AM		1		
6339	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies as a Rosgen A/B.'	9/24/2002 10:41:49 AM		2		
6340	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map shows road following western bank of upper Speelyai.'	9/24/2002 2:59:09 PM		3		
6341	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC map shows road following western bank of upper Speelyai.'	9/24/2002 2:59:09 PM		3		
6342	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO 8.4-12.6.'	9/20/2002 2:30:58 PM		1		
6343	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO 8.4-12.6.'	9/20/2002 2:30:58 PM		4		
6344	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6345	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6346	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Road densities averaged for lower and upper Swift Creek drainage.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6347	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Road densities averaged for lower and upper Swift Creek drainage.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6348	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6349	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: 10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6350	WG	'Speelyai hatchery in the reach immediately downstream'	9/24/2002 11:24:54 AM		1		
6351	WG	'Speelyai hatchery in the reach immediately downstream'	9/24/2002 11:24:54 AM		2		
6352	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		1		
6353	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6354	NKA	'Couldn't find reach specific gradient info for Speelyei.  Avg gradient of reaches 1-3 is 3.7%.'	9/20/2002 1:43:40 PM		1		
6355	NKA	'Couldn't find reach specific gradient info for Speelyei.  Avg gradient of reaches 1-3 is 3.7%.'	9/20/2002 1:43:40 PM		2		
6356	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		1		
6357	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6358	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:56 PM		3		
6359	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:56 PM		4		
6360	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:59 PM		3		
6361	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:59 PM		4		
6362	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:52 PM		3		
6363	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:52 PM		4		
6364	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:39 PM		2		
6365	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:39 PM		3		
6366	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6367	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		4		
6368	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:46 PM		2		
6369	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:46 PM		3		
6370	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:49 PM		3		
6371	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:49 PM		3		
6372	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:42 PM		2		
6373	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from Pacific Corp FERC.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % glide % beaver pond, % combined unit, dominant substrate.    Any % delegated to combined units was assigned equally to its designated subcomponents.  Pools were decremented by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate. This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/20/2002 2:06:42 PM		3		
6374	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6375	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6376	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6377	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6378	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6379	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6380	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6381	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6382	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6383	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6384	NKA	'15.5 ft chute 3.7 mi. from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:10:20 PM		1		
6385	NKA	'15.5 ft chute 3.7 mi. from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:10:20 PM		2		
6386	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6387	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6388	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 2:59:39 PM		2		
6389	WG	'Rating suggested by Kevin Malone'	9/24/2002 2:59:39 PM		2		
6390	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:58:43 AM		2		
6391	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 10:58:43 AM		3		
6392	NKA	'Pacific Corp recorded temps as low as 0.3 degrees on 12/22/98.'	9/20/2002 2:37:59 PM		2		
6393	NKA	'Pacific Corp recorded temps as low as 0.3 degrees on 12/22/98.'	9/20/2002 2:37:59 PM		4		
6394	NKA	'Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed 16 degrees was exceeded 35 times.'	9/20/2002 2:33:00 PM		1		
6395	NKA	'Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed 16 degrees was exceeded 35 times.'	9/20/2002 2:33:00 PM		3		
6396	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6397	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		3		
6398	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6399	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/20/2002 1:23:47 PM		2		
6400	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  32.8 pieces of LWD/mile in lower Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:16:07 PM		2		
6401	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  32.8 pieces of LWD/mile in lower Speelyei. (Pacific Corp  FERC report).'	9/20/2002 2:16:07 PM		3		
6402	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:39:02 PM		1		
6403	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:39:02 PM		3		
6404	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:17:06 PM		1		
6405	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:17:06 PM		3		
6406	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:28 PM		2		
6407	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/16/2002 3:19:28 PM		4		
6408	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:59 PM		4		
6409	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:33:59 PM		4		
6410	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:19 AM		3		
6411	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:19 AM		3		
6412	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Spencer as a Rosgen A stream.'	9/18/2002 8:59:32 AM		3		
6413	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies Spencer as a Rosgen A stream.'	9/18/2002 8:59:32 AM		3		
6414		'Maps don't show any roads following the creek.'	9/2/2002 9:23:07 AM		3		
6415		'Maps don't show any roads following the creek.'	9/2/2002 9:23:07 AM		4		
6416	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:07:23 PM		2		
6417	nka	'D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/16/2002 2:07:23 PM		4		
6418	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:19:31 PM		3		
6419	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:19:31 PM		3		
6420	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Marble Creek Comments for reach are: Small stream likely subject to flow fluctuations from moderate freshets'	8/29/2002 2:57:14 PM		3		
6421	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Marble Creek Comments for reach are: Small stream likely subject to flow fluctuations from moderate freshets'	8/29/2002 2:57:14 PM		4		
6422	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:56:08 PM		3		
6423	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/17/2002 3:56:08 PM		3		
6424	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:22:18 AM		2		
6425	WG	'9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/16/2002 9:22:18 AM		2		
6426	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:43:44 PM		1		
6427	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:43:44 PM		2		
6428	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:26:33 PM		2		
6429	nka	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:26:33 PM		3		
6430	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:23 PM		1		
6431	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:23 PM		2		
6432		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:26 PM		4		
6433		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:26 PM		4		
6434		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:31 PM		4		
6435		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:31 PM		4		
6436		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:22 PM		4		
6437		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:22 PM		4		
6438	nka	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:01 PM		4		
6439	nka	'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:01 PM		4		
6440	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:27 PM		4		
6441	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/25/2002 1:09:27 PM		4		
6442		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:16 PM		4		
6443		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:16 PM		4		
6444		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:19 PM		4		
6445		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:19 PM		4		
6446		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:13 PM		4		
6447		'Assumed similar to Cussed Hollow.'	9/19/2002 7:40:13 PM		4		
6448	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional'	9/20/2002 8:09:37 AM		3		
6449	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional'	9/20/2002 8:09:37 AM		3		
6450	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Marble Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:56:42 PM		2		
6451	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Marble Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/29/2002 2:56:42 PM		2		
6452	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:38 PM		2		
6453	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:38 PM		2		
6454	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:42 PM		2		
6455	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:42 PM		2		
6456	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:33 PM		2		
6457	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:52:33 PM		2		
6458	NKA	'14 ft falls at RM0.6 (Pacific Corp Report)'	9/2/2002 9:42:36 AM		1		
6459	NKA	'14 ft falls at RM0.6 (Pacific Corp Report)'	9/2/2002 9:42:36 AM		1		
6460	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:33:47 AM		2		
6461	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:33:47 AM		2		
6462	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:26:00 AM		3		
6463	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:26:00 AM		3		
6464	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:20:27 AM		2		
6465	WG	'Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/16/2002 11:20:27 AM		3		
6466	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:27:46 PM		4		
6467	NKA	'All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/19/2002 6:27:46 PM		4		
6468	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:08:29 PM		4		
6469	NKA	'Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/19/2002 6:08:29 PM		4		
6470	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:10:05 AM		3		
6471	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:10:05 AM		3		
6472	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:48:17 AM		3		
6473	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams.'	9/26/2002 9:48:17 AM		4		
6474	wg	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in Spencer Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:20:14 PM		3		
6475	wg	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 10 pieces/mile in Spencer Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/17/2002 12:20:14 PM		3		
6476	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/2/2002 9:38:29 AM		1		
6477	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/2/2002 9:38:29 AM		3		
6478	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/2/2002 9:38:19 AM		1		
6479	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC reports'	9/2/2002 9:38:19 AM		3		
6480	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6481	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6482	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6483	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6484	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6485	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6486	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6487	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6488	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6489	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6490	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6491	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6492	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6493	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6494	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6495	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6496	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6497	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. See Panamaker for template rationale'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6498	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6499	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6500	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6501	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6502	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6503	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6504	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		1		
6505	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6506	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6507	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6508	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6509	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6510	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6511	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6512	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6513	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6514	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6515	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6516	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6517	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6518	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6519	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6520	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6521	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6522	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6523	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6524	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6525	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6526	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6527	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6528	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6529	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6530	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6531	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6532	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6533	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6534	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6535	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6536	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6537	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6538	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6539	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6540	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6541	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6542	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6543	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6544	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6545	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6546	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6547	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6548	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6549	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6550	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6551	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6552	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6553	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		3		
6554		''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		1		
6555		''	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6556	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6557	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6558	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		2		
6559	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:48:36 AM		4		
6560	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32'	8/27/2002 2:44:37 PM		1		
6561	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC project reported alkalinity values of 20-32'	8/27/2002 2:44:37 PM		4		
6562	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:34:10 PM		4		
6563	NKA	'Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/17/2002 1:34:10 PM		4		
6564	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:41 AM		3		
6565	WG	'Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/16/2002 10:45:41 AM		3		
6566	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A - Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 7:43:14 AM		1		
6567	NKA	'Rosgen channel type A - Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 7:43:14 AM		2		
6568	NKA	'Maps show little influence by roads on Swift Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:24:30 PM		3		
6569	NKA	'Maps show little influence by roads on Swift Cr.'	8/30/2002 4:24:30 PM		3		
6570	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.5 mg/L'	9/16/2002 2:07:39 PM		1		
6571	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp shows DO greater than 9.5 mg/L'	9/16/2002 2:07:39 PM		4		
6572	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:20:21 PM		3		
6573	WG	'Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/17/2002 4:20:21 PM		3		
6574	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Road densities averaged for lower and upper Swift Creek drainage.'	9/17/2002 4:02:15 PM		3		
6575	WG	'Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Lower Lewis River watershed analysis (1996). Road densities averaged for lower and upper Swift Creek drainage.'	9/17/2002 4:02:15 PM		3		
6576	WG	'10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/16/2002 9:27:32 AM		2		
6577	WG	'10 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace, and bull trout.'	9/16/2002 9:27:32 AM		2		
6578	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:43:58 PM		1		
6579	WG	'Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/16/2002 12:43:58 PM		2		
6580	NKA	' None mentioned in USFS report'	8/26/2002 12:26:25 PM		1		
6581	NKA	' None mentioned in USFS report'	8/26/2002 12:26:25 PM		2		
6582	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:00:22 PM		1		
6583	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/17/2002 2:00:22 PM		2		
6584	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:37 PM		1		
6585	WG	'Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/16/2002 1:05:37 PM		2		
6586	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:26 AM		3		
6587	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:26 AM		4		
6588	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:32 AM		3		
6589	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:32 AM		4		
6590	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:21 AM		3		
6591	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:21 AM		3		
6592	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:47:55 AM		3		
6593	NKA	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:47:55 AM		3		
6594	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:43:17 AM		4		
6595	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:43:17 AM		4		
6596	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:10 AM		3		
6597	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:10 AM		3		
6598	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:15 AM		3		
6599	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:15 AM		3		
6600	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:02 AM		3		
6601	WG	'Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.  This reach was completed by the workgroup and final numbers were adjusted slightly to reflect proffessional opinion of conditions.'	9/19/2002 7:48:02 AM		3		
6602	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:53:27 AM		1		
6603	WG	'Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	9/20/2002 7:53:27 AM		2		
6604	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 10:59:27 AM		3		
6605	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cougar Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	8/26/2002 10:59:27 AM		3		
6606	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:06 PM		2		
6607	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:06 PM		2		
6608	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:10 PM		2		
6609	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:10 PM		2		
6610	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:03 PM		2		
6611	WG	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/16/2002 2:53:03 PM		2		
6612	NKA	'80 ft falls 1639 ft from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/19/2002 6:41:02 PM		1		
6613	NKA	'80 ft falls 1639 ft from the mouth (Pacific Corp FERC report).'	9/19/2002 6:41:02 PM		2		
6614	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:34:03 AM		2		
6615	WG	'Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/16/2002 10:34:03 AM		2		
6616	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:26:25 AM		2		
6617	WG	'Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/17/2002 10:26:25 AM		2		
6618	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:23 AM		2		
6619	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:03:23 AM		3		
6620	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 5/18/00.  Min temps before and 11/22/99 reached 3.5 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 3.  Pacific Corp Prelim. Water quality report (1995) documents temperatures in November of 1994 with a daily min of 2.5 on 11/05/94.'	9/17/2002 10:05:38 AM		2		
6621	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report documents daily min temps up until 11/22/99, and after 5/18/00.  Min temps before and 11/22/99 reached 3.5 degrees.  Assumed that min daily temps between those dates dropped below 3.  Pacific Corp Prelim. Water quality report (1995) documents temperatures in November of 1994 with a daily min of 2.5 on 11/05/94.'	9/17/2002 10:05:38 AM		4		
6622	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp/Cowlits PUD.  Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed seven day avg max was 10.2 degrees celcius.  Max daily temp was 10.5 on July 28, 1999.  Template had lower temp because mud flows removed canopy.'	9/17/2002 8:36:41 AM		1		
6623	NKA	'Lewis River FERC report by Pacific Corp/Cowlits PUD.  Thermograph from May 99 to April 2000 showed seven day avg max was 10.2 degrees celcius.  Max daily temp was 10.5 on July 28, 1999.  Template had lower temp because mud flows removed canopy.'	9/17/2002 8:36:41 AM		3		
6624	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:10:28 AM		3		
6625	WG	'Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/17/2002 8:10:28 AM		3		
6626	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/16/2002 3:56:46 PM		2		
6627	WG	'Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995 and proffessional judgement.'	9/16/2002 3:56:46 PM		2		
6628	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS Swift Cr. stream survey report documents 0 pieces/mile in Swift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  However, the survey covered only the lower 0.3 miles of Swift Cr. These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup. Template: based on proffessional opinion of the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 9:09:07 AM		2		
6629	NKA	'Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS Swift Cr. stream survey report documents 0 pieces/mile in Swift Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  However, the survey covered only the lower 0.3 miles of Swift Cr. These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup. Template: based on proffessional opinion of the workgroup.'	9/25/2002 9:09:07 AM		3		
6630	NKA	'USFS Swift Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 11:02:39 AM		1		
6631	NKA	'USFS Swift Creek stream survey'	8/26/2002 11:02:39 AM		3		
6632	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:56:46 PM		3		
6633	Nick Ackerman	'No data available.  Used the following conversion factors as recommended by Dan Rawding.  Confinement = 4, ACW = 1.1*min wid; Confinement = 3, ACW = 1.25*min wid; Confinement=2, ACW = 1.5*min wid; Confinement = 1, ACW = 1.75*min wid.'	9/25/2002 12:56:46 PM		3		
6634	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6635	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6636	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6637	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6638	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6639	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6640	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6641	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6642	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6643	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6644	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6645	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6646	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6647	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed somewhat better than Muddy and Panamaker, but worse than template. KM used this data for all inundated streams and low gradient small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6648	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6649	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6650	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:28:28 AM		3		
6651	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:28:28 AM		4		
6652	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6653	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6654	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6655	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6656	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6657	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6658	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		1		
6659	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6660	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6661	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6662	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6663	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6664	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6665	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6666	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6667	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6668	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6669	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6670	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6671	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6672	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6673	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6674	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6675	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6676	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6677	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6678	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6679	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6680	WG	'Changed to reflect upstream reach'	2/11/2003 8:29:02 AM		3		
6681	WG	'Changed to reflect upstream reach'	2/11/2003 8:29:02 AM		3		
6682	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6683	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6684	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6685	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6686	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6687	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6688	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6689	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6690	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6691	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6692	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6693	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6694	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6695	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6696	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6697	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6698	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6699	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6700	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6701	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6702	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6703	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6704	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6705	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6706	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6707	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		3		
6708		''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		1		
6709		''	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6710	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6711	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6712	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		2		
6713	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:52:05 AM		4		
6714	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6715	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6716	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6717	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6718	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6719	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6720	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6721	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6722	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6723	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6724	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6725	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6726	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:31:05 AM		3		
6727	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:31:05 AM		3		
6728	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6729	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6730	KM	'Reservoir effect flow variation'	2/11/2003 8:34:18 AM		3		
6731	KM	'Reservoir effect flow variation'	2/11/2003 8:34:18 AM		4		
6732	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:30:46 AM		3		
6733	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:30:46 AM		4		
6734	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6735	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6736	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6737	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6738	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6739	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6740	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		1		
6741	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6742	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6743	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6744	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6745	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6746	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6747	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6748	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6749	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6750	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6751	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6752	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
5715		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		1		
5716		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5717	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		1		
5718	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		2		
5719	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5720	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5721	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5722	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5723	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5724	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5725	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5726	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5727	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:51:02 AM		4		
5728	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:51:02 AM		4		
5729	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5730	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
6754	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6753	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6771	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6772	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6773	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6774	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6775	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6776	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6777	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6778	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6779	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6780	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6781	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6782	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6783	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6784	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6785	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6786	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6787	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6788	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6789	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6790		''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		1		
6791		''	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6792	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		2		
6793	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6794	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:47:52 AM		2		
6795	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive.'	2/11/2003 7:47:52 AM		4		
6796	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6797	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6798	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6799	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6800	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6801	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6802	NKA	'Rosgen class not documented (Pacific Corp FERC report).  Assumed confined like much of the rest of the basin.'	9/24/2002 10:46:31 AM		4		
6803	NKA	'Rosgen class not documented (Pacific Corp FERC report).  Assumed confined like much of the rest of the basin.'	9/24/2002 10:46:31 AM		4		
6804	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6805	nka	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6806	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6807	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6808	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6809	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: USFS Stream survey reportTemplate:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995).'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6810	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6811	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6812	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6813	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6814	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		1		
6815	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6816	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6817	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6818	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6819	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6820	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6821	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6822	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6823	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6824	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6825	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6826	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:46:05 AM		4		
6827	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:46:05 AM		4		
6828	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6829	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6830	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6831	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6832	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6833	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6834	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6835	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs above head of Swift are rain on snow transitional.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6836	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6837	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Copper Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Chickoom Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream, not likely to impacted by icing'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6838	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6839	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6840	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6841	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6842	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6843	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6844	NKA	'No barrier documented (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 1:19:52 PM		1		
6845	NKA	'No barrier documented (Pacific Corp FERC reports)'	9/20/2002 1:19:52 PM		2		
6846	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6847	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6848	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 10:00:11 AM		4		
6849	WG	' Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/26/2002 10:00:11 AM		4		
6850	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		2		
6851	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6852	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6853	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6854	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6855	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Cloned from Crab Cr.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6856	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6857	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have large sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6858	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		3		
6859	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6860	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6861	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Cussed Hollow Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 65 pieces/mile in Cussed Hollow Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 8:20:58 AM		4		
6862	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:18:13 PM		1		
6863	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:18:13 PM		3		
6864	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:18:09 PM		1		
6865	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 1:18:09 PM		3		
6866	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed RB trib1 (27.0258) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:29:57 PM		4		
6867	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed RB trib1 (27.0258) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:29:57 PM		4		
6868	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:20:27 PM		4		
6869	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:20:27 PM		4		
6870	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed LB trib (27.0255?) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed RB trib1 (27.0258) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:51:47 PM		4		
6871	GWG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed LB trib (27.0255?) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: unnamed RB trib1 (27.0258) Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Pup Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Johnson Cr Comments for reach are: Harza Habitat Survey Data'	5/30/2001 1:51:47 PM		4		
6872	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	2/14/2003 8:06:26 AM		2		
6873	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	2/14/2003 8:06:26 AM		4		
6874	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6875	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6876	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6877	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6878	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Smith as a Rosgen D channel.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6879	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report GIS map classifies Smith as a Rosgen D channel.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6880	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along much of western bank of Smith Creek.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6881	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along much of western bank of Smith Creek.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6882	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6883	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in 1994 in the Lewis Basin indicates that there are no problems associated with depressed D.O. levels.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6884	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6885	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6886	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences. KM increased for upper Smith as this stream is in blast zone.'	2/14/2003 8:05:04 AM		3		
6887	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Assumed equal to Panamker.  Template:  Assumed higher than most of the basin because of glacial and volcanic influences. KM increased for upper Smith as this stream is in blast zone.'	2/14/2003 8:05:04 AM		4		
6888	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6889	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6890	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		1		
6891	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6892	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: none reported in USFS reports'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		1		
6893	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: none reported in USFS reports'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6894	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report. Changed to 1.5% for Upper Smith.  Taken from average Topo lines in mainstem and small tribs.'	2/14/2003 8:04:06 AM		1		
6895	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report. Changed to 1.5% for Upper Smith.  Taken from average Topo lines in mainstem and small tribs.'	2/14/2003 8:04:06 AM		3		
6896	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		1		
6897	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6898	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6899	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6900	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6901	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6902	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6903	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6904	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6905	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6906	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Increased rating in this reach because of confinement rating.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6907	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear). Increased rating in this reach because of confinement rating.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6908	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6909	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6910	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6911	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6912	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6913	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6914	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6915	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6916	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6917	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Western Cascade stream'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6918	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6919	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6920	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6921	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6922	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6923	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6924		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6925		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp doesn?t document any barriers.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6926	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6927	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		2		
6928	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members. KM decreased riparian value in Patient to account for effect Mt. St. Helens had on this stream riparian.'	2/14/2003 8:06:05 AM		3		
6929	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members. KM decreased riparian value in Patient to account for effect Mt. St. Helens had on this stream riparian.'	2/14/2003 8:06:05 AM		3		
6930	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6931	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6932	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6933	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: All reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6934	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS).'	2/14/2003 8:02:47 AM		2		
6935	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: USFS data from Smith Creek from summer of 1998 showed that 16 degrees was exceeded on all 58 sampling days.  The highest recorded temp was 20.55 degrees in July.(Data obtained from USFS).'	2/14/2003 8:02:47 AM		3		
6936	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6937	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Mostly unconfined channel type may have groundwater influences.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6938	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6939	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data from the Lewis River basin in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995, and relative comparisons by proffessional opinion of water clarity between streams. Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template due to roads and logging.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		4		
6940	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS stream survey report for Smith creek documents 13 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. .  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6941	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS stream survey report for Smith creek documents 13 pieces/mile in Pine Creek. .  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.  Mt. St. Helens eruption and subsequent mudflows significantly altered riparian areas and instream wood (USFS stream survey report). Template condition based on the assumption that the reach is continuously experiencing impacts of periodic St. Helens eruptions.'	2/14/2003 7:59:33 AM		3		
6942	KM	'See width max'	2/14/2003 8:02:26 AM		3		
6943	KM	'See width max'	2/14/2003 8:02:26 AM		4		
6944	KM	'Upper Smith Creek added to analysis based on Topo data and conversations with Janne Kaje andFrank Shrier.  Upper Smith Creek is in blast zone of St.Helens.  High sediment load in Patient, but Template would have provided good habitat. Ratings copied from Smith Creek.  Lengths decreased to account for headwater changes.'	2/14/2003 8:02:07 AM		3		
6945	KM	'Upper Smith Creek added to analysis based on Topo data and conversations with Janne Kaje andFrank Shrier.  Upper Smith Creek is in blast zone of St.Helens.  High sediment load in Patient, but Template would have provided good habitat. Ratings copied from Smith Creek.  Lengths decreased to account for headwater changes.'	2/14/2003 8:02:07 AM		4		
6946	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6947	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6948	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6949	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of Kathy Dube (Pacific Corp)'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6950	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6951	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6952	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 3:44:54 PM		2		
6953	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report classifies this reach as Rosgen A.'	9/20/2002 3:44:54 PM		2		
6954	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6955	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Maps show some potential influence by roads on Range Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6956	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		1		
6957	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Range Cr. show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995).'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6958	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6959	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed % embedded = % fines.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6960	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6961	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Template:  Based on report by Peterson et al. 1992 that found fines are typically 6-11% in unmanaged streams in the Pacific Northwest, BC and Alaska.  Patient: Calculated by assuming streams begin at a baseline of 8.5% fines (Peterson et al 1992).  Then, for every increase in road denisty of 1mi/mi^2, there is a 4.3% increase in % fines (Rittmueller 1986).  Road densities were obtained from USFS Middle Lewis River watershed analysis (1995). Road density used from "Middle Swift Reservoir Tribs."'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6962	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6963	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6964	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		1		
6965	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6966	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		1		
6967	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Swift Creek Comments for reach are:  None mentioned in USFS report'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6968		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		1		
6969		'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6970	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		1		
6971	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6972	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6973	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6974	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6975	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6976	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6977	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6978	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6979	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6980	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:51:20 AM		4		
6981	NKA	'Gradient of less than 3%, Rating = 1.  Gradient equal to or greater than 3% and less than 5 = 0.5. Gradient greater than or equal to 5%, rating = 0.  Based on ratings assigned to reaches completed by the workgroup (Swift and Clear).'	9/24/2002 10:51:20 AM		4		
6982	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6983	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6984	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6985	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6986	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6987	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
6988	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6989	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6990	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6991	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
6992	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6993	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6994	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6995	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6996	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6997	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
6998	NKA	'When reservoir is low, culvert at mouth provides an impassable barrier.'	9/20/2002 3:43:44 PM		1		
6999	NKA	'When reservoir is low, culvert at mouth provides an impassable barrier.'	9/20/2002 3:43:44 PM		2		
7000	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
7001	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		2		
7002	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7003	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7004	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:05:02 AM		2		
7005	WG	'Tribs to Reservoirs have a rating of 0 in patient and 2.5 in template.'	9/24/2002 11:05:02 AM		3		
7006	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7007	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Assumed the same as Swift CreekAll reaches with data yielded values between 0.2 and 0.7.  Assumed other reaches would fall in this range.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7008	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7009	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Cloned from Drift Cr.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7010	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
7011	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Confined channel unlikely to have sources of groundwater influence.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
7012	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
7013	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		3		
7014	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7015	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3 (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  USFS Range Cr. stream survey report documents 13.6 pieces/mile in Range Cr.  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	9/20/2002 3:41:52 PM		4		
7016	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:45:17 PM		1		
7017	NKA	'Pacific Corp FERC report.'	9/20/2002 3:45:17 PM		4		
7018	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 3:45:07 PM		1		
7019	Nick Ackerman	'Pacific Corp FERC report'	9/20/2002 3:45:07 PM		4		
7020	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7021	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents alkalinity measurements ranging from 8-44mg/L throughout the Lewis basin.  Listel recommends a rating of 2 for westside streams. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7022	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7023	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7024	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7025	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Workgroup agreed that benthos diversity is not likely to be reduced from template conditions.  Sampling in Cougar Creek indicated a healthy invert population.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7026	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:58:26 AM		3		
7027	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:58:26 AM		3		
7028	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7029	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Map shows road running along eastern bank'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7030	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7031	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: D.O. sampling by Pacific Corp in summer of 1994 in Clear Creek show D.O. consistently above 10 mg/L.  (Pacific Corp preliminary water quality report 1995). KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7032	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:49 AM		3		
7033	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:49 AM		3		
7034	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7035	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: No variation in Template condition, for inundated reaches this is still true.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7036	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:38 AM		3		
7037	KM	'Changed to reflect that reach is inundated by reservoir'	2/11/2003 8:19:38 AM		4		
7038	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7039	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: 9 spp: Rainbow, Cutthroat, Coho, Chinook, Steelhead, mountain whitefish, suckers, sculpin, dace.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7040	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7041	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient:  Rating based on potential for hatchery fish from reservoirs or mainstem to stray into the basin.  No sea shasta or whirling disease has been reported in the Lewis Basin.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7042	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7043	NKA	''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7044	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		1		
7045	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams. Changed gradient to 0.5% to model a low gradient stream reach.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7046	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7047	WG	''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7048	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7049	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7050	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7051	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7052	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7053	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7054	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7055	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of upper basin low gradient streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7056	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7057	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7058	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7059	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7060	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7061	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7062	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7063	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7064	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7065	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7066	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7067	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7068	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7069	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7070	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7071	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7072	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7073	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7074	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7075	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7076	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7077	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7078	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7079	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating is based on peak predation on subyearlings.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7080	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7081	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Based on proffessional opinion of work group members.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7082	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7083	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Patient: Rating is based on a proposed outplanting plan that would seed the Middle Lewis with some carcasses.  Template:  WG believed that heaviest historical spawning occurred between Range and Rush Cr. in the mainstem, in the Muddy River, Clear Cr., Clearwater Cr., and Smith Cr.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7084	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7085	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7086	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7087	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7088	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7089	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7090	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7091	NG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on turbidity data in Pacific Corp preliminary water quality study - 1995.  Assumed patient is slightly more turbid than template because of influence of logging and roads. Km used these data for all small tribs not mapped by USFS'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7092	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7093	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Rating based on the following criteria.  80 pieces of LWD per mile = rating of 1, 50 pieces of LWD per mile = 2, 10 pieces per mile = 3.  USFS stream survey summary report documents 49 pieces/mile in Clear Cr. (Kinney and Lampo 2002).  These criteria were agreed on by the workgroup.'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		3		
7094		''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		1		
7095		''	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7096	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		2		
7097	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: USFS stream survey report'	2/11/2003 7:45:33 AM		4		
7098	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Widths were changed to reflect smaller streams.'	3/25/2003 9:02:04 PM		2		
7099	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: For all small tribs assumed that USFS data for Clear Creek was represetantive. Widths were changed to reflect smaller streams.'	3/25/2003 9:02:04 PM		4		
7100	Garrow	No data from the questionnaire.	9/16/2005	9/16/2005			
7101	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7102	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7103	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7104	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7105	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7106	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7107	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7108	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7109	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7110	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/20/2005	9/20/2005	3		99
7111	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7112	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7113	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7114	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7115	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7116	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7117	EDT	Ratings describe degraded conditions for analysis of preservation priorities; degraded attribute ratings drafted for Yakima Basin. The need review	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
7118	EDT	Unable to find a degraded assumption for this attribute - default use current conditions	9/21/2005	9/21/2005	3		99
6755	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6756	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6757	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6758	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6759	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6760	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6761	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek, assumed that Clear Creek is representative of low gradient upper basin streams.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		4		
6762	KM	'Similar to all Swift tributaries'	2/11/2003 8:33:41 AM		3		
6763	KM	'Similar to all Swift tributaries'	2/11/2003 8:33:41 AM		3		
6764	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6765	KM	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Ratings from Clear Creek'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6766	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6767	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used these data for all small tribs.  Km used for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6768	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6769	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used data for all small tribs'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
6770	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Merwin Small Tribs Comments for reach are: Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Clear Creek Comments for reach are: Pacific Corp FERC report documents metal concentrations were below Freshwater Chronic Criteria.  Pesticides and fuels were less than instrument detection limits.  Samples were taken at various locations throughout the basin above Merwin dam.  No reason to suspect elevated levels of any metals or pollutants in soil or water column. KM used for all small tribs.'	2/11/2003 7:46:30 AM		3		
5731	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5732	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5733	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5734	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Habitat Type Methods: Patient:  Data derived from USFS stream survey reports.  USFS presents data on %pool, % riffle, % side channel, % special units, and dominant substrate.  % Glides was predicted using an equation relating gradient to % glides.  Any % delegated to special uints and side channels was assigned equally to % riffle and % pool. % Pool was subsequently decreased by whatever the % glides as predicted from gradient was.  Pools were further decreased by 20% (x% pools - 0.2x%pools = final % pools) which was delegated to pool tailouts.  If cobble or boulders were the dominant substrate, and the gradient was greater than 6%, we assumed that % riffle was 5:1, Large subst. riffle:small subst riffle.  If the gradient was less than 6%, the ratio changed to 4:1.  If gravel was dominant, we assumed a 1:1 ratio of large subst to small subst riffle.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% backwater habitat.  Template: Assumed there is 40% less pools and tailouts today than in template conditions.  Any increase in pools and tailouts, equalled a decrease in large substrate riffles.  Large substrate riffles were additionally decremented 5% of their original rating.  This additional 5% decrease was assigned as an increase in small substrate riffles.  This was done to reflect an increase in spawning gravels in template conditions.  Assumed more wood in the stream would help retain the smaller substrate.  If gradient was less than 2, we assumed 3% beaver ponds. Had to make an adjustment to this one because the increase in % pools caused the % riffles to decrease to below 0%.  Assumed only a minor increase in % pools in template conditions, only a small decrease in % riffles in template conditons.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		4		
5735	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5736	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are: Proffessional opinion of workgroup.  All tribs below head of Swift are rainfall dominated.'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
5737	NKA	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Range Creek Comments for reach are:  Western Cascade stream'	9/20/2002 8:31:10 AM		3		
26	WG	'Cloned attribute ratings from reach: Smith Creek Comments for reach are: Potential plan for outplanting in the mainstem Lewis of hatchery fish to stimulate production in the basin.'	9/20/2002 8:29:45 AM		1		
